Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of morphohydraulic habitat structure on invertebrate communities (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera)

  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluvial geomorphology proposes the methodology of cognition and assessment of the riverine landscape and points to the possibilities of exploitation of its results in hydrobiological research. Habitat structure of two reaches of the Drietomica brook (Biele Karpaty Mts, Slovakia) was assesed at level of morphological and morphohydraulic units in the sense of the River Morphology Hierarchical Classification (RMHC)). Physical habitats were described by flow hydraulics and substrate properties as directly measured variables (current velocity, depth, substrate size) and related variables (flow type, Froude and Reynolds numbers). According to the shear stress (expressed by Fr and Re), the morphological units were divided into two main groups — with low shear stress — pools, glides, edgewaters, bar nooks and bars; with high shear stress — riffles, runs, rapids and scours; characterized also by different Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) communities. The EPT communities were analyzed in relation to the morphological, hydraulic and substrate characteristics of the stream channel. The main environmental gradient responsible for the variation in EPT fauna was found using Principal Component Analysis and was related to gradient of flow in term of current velocity and other hydraulic attributes covered by Fr and Re numbers. The EPT communities (by means of abundance, feeding types, current, microhabitat and zonation preferences) showed preferences for different morphological units, flow type and current velocity. Depth and substrate grain size showed only weak relation to EPT communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambruš B. & Bulánková E. 2005. Influence of the hydromorphology of the Hron River on the common kingfisher Alcedo atthis ispida (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coraciformes: Alcedinidae). Acta Facultatis Ecologiae 13: 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beisel J.-N., Usseglio-Polatera P. & Moreteau J.-C. 2000. The spatial heterogenity of a river bottom: a key factor determinig macroinvertebrates community. Hydrobiologia 422/433: 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisel J.-N., Usseglio-Polatera P., Thomas S. & Moreteau J.-C. 1998a. Effects of mesohabitat sampling strategy on the assessment of stream quality with benthic invertebrate assemblages. Arch. Hydrobiol. 142/4:493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beisel J.-N., Useglio-Polatera P., Thomas S. & Moreteau J.-C. 1998b. Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics. Hydrobiologia 389: 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitušík P. & Novikmec M. 1997. The structure of the macrozoobenthos of Zbojský potok brook. Ochrana Prírody 15: 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brierley G., Fryirs K., Outhet D. & Massey C. 2002. Application of the River Styles framework as a basis for river management in New South Wales, Australia. Applied Geography 22: 91–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks A.J., Haeusler T., Reinfelda I. & Williams S. 2005. Hydraulic microhabitats and the distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in riffles. Hydrobiologia 50: 31–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulánková E., Krno I. & Halgoš J. 2000. Macrozoobethos as an indicator of environmental perturbations in the Hron River basin in the region of Žiar valley. Správy Slovenskej Zoologickej Spoločnosti 18: 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulánková E. & Némethová D. 2007. Linkages between Land-Use, Water Quality, Physical Habitat Conditions and Selected Macroinvertebrate Assemblages of the Hron River (Slovakia). Acta Univ. Carolinae Environ. 21: 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K.R. 1998. Detecting change in benthic community structure, pp. 131–142. In: Oger R. (ed.), Proceedings of invited papers, 14th International Biometric Conference, Belgium, Namour.

  • Clifford N.J., Harmar O.P., Harvey G. & Petts G.E. 2006. Physical habitat, eco-hydraulics and river design: a review and re-evaluation of some popular concepts and methods. Aquat. Conserv. 16: 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derka T., Kováčová J. & Bulánková, E. 2001. Substrate importance for selected macrozoobenthic communities in Rudava river. Folia Faunistica Slovaca 6: 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derka T. & Szomolai V. 2000. Macroinvertebrate communities on submerged roots of riparian trees in the side arm system in the Slovak section of the Danube river, pp. 166–170. In: Rulík M. (ed.), Sborník referátu XII. Limnologické konference, Kouty nad Desnou (ČLS a SLS).

  • Frissell C.A., Liss W.J., Warren C.E. & Hurley M.D. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing stream in watershed context. Environ. Manag. 10: 199–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavlasová S. & Derka T. 2004. The importance of submerged roots of riparian trees for the macroinvertebrates communities of the Jelešňa river. Acta Facultatis Ecologiae 12: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon N.D., McMahon T.A., Finlayson B.L., Gippel C.J. & Nathan R. 2004. Stream Hydrology. An Introduction for Ecologists. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England, 429 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grešková A. & Lehotský M. 2004. Spatial structures of riverine landscape, pp. 44–51. In: Měkotová J. & Štěrba O. (eds), Říční krajina, Palackého univerzita, Olomouc.

  • Grešková A., Lehotský M., & Pastuchová Z. 2007. Small stream channel bed morpho-hydraulic structure and macroinvertebrate communities. Geografický časopis 59: 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper D., Smith C., Kemp J. & Crosa G. 1998. The use of’ functional habitats’in the conservation, management and rehabilitation of rivers, pp. 315–326. In: Bretschko G. & Helešic J. (eds), Advances in River Bottom Ecology, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.

  • Harper D.M. 1995. River bottom habitats: Biological reality and practical value in river management, pp. 35–45. In: Bretschko G., Helešic J. & Kubíček F. (eds), The Ecological Importance of River Bottom, Folia Fac. Sci. Nat. Univ. Masarykianae Brunensis, Biol., 91.

  • Hart D.D. & Finelli C.M. 1999. Physical — biological coupling in streams: The pervasive effects of flow on benthic organisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 363–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes H.B.N. 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 555 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp J.L., Harper D.M. & Crosa G.A. 1999. Use of functional habitats to link ecology with morphology and hydrology in river rehabilitation. Aquat. Conserv. 9: 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp J.L., Harper D.M. & Crosa G.A. 2000. The habitat-scale ecohydraulics of rivers. Ecological Engineering 16: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krno I. 1984. Influence of pollution on the taxocenosis of early-springs (Plecoptera) of the brook Vydrica (Small Carpathians). Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianae Zool. 27: 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krno I. 1996. Ecological factors influence on stoneflies distribution in various river basins of the Slovenský kras (Karst) mountain range biosphere reserve. Ekológia (Bratislava) 15: 261–281.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krno I. 2000. Macrozoobenthos of the Biely Váh river basin, its original status and a forecast of the changes. Acta Environ. Univ. Comenianae 10: 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krno I., Bulánková E. & Halgoš J. 1993. Present condition of water cleanness in the river Váh (Lisková — L’ubochňa) in the vicinity of Ružomberok. Acta Zool. Univ. Comenianae 37: 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krno I., Šporka F., Galas J., Hamerlík L., Zat’ovičová Z. & Bitušík P. 2006. Littoral benthic macroinvertebrates of mountain lakes in the Tatra Mountains (Slovakia, Poland). Biologia 61: 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krno I., Šporka F., Tirjaková E., Bulánková E., Deván P., Degma P., Bitušík P., Kodada J., Pomichal R. & Hulová D. 1996. Limnology of the Turiec river basin (West Carpathians, Slovakia). Biologia 51,Suppl. 2, 122 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehotský M. 2004. River Morphology Hierarchical Classification (RMHC). Acta Univ. Carol. Geogr. 39: 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehotský M. 2005. Morphohydraulic unit as base of habit, pp. 67–70. In: Rypl J. (ed.), Geomorfologický Zborník 4 — Stav geomorfologických výskumů v roce 2005, České Budějovice.

  • Lehotský M. & Grešková A. 2003. Geomorphology, fluvial geosystems and riverine landscape (methodological aspects). Geomorphologica Slovaca 2: 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehotský M. & Grešková A. 2004a. Riverine landscape and geomorphology: ecological implications and river management strategy. Ekológia (Bratislava) 23: 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehotský M. & Grešková A. 2004b. Channel-floodplain geosystem and riverine landscape — survey and assessment. Geografie, Sborník České Geografické Společnosti (Praha) 109: 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehotský M. & Grešková A. 2005. Basic classification systems and morphometric characteristics of the channel-floodplain geosystems. Geomorphologia Slovaca 5: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock I. 1999. The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluation river health. Freshwater Biol. 41: 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mérigoux S. & Dolédec S. 2004. Hydraulic requierements of stream communities: a case study in invertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 49: 600–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D.R. 1999. Process domains and the river continuum. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 36: 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D.R. & Buffington J.M. 1998. Channel processes, classification, and response, pp. 13–42. In: Naiman R. & Bilby R. (eds), River Ecology and Management, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson M.D. 2002. Geomorhological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystem management. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 12: 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newson M.D., Harper D.M., Padmore C.L., Kemp J.L. & Vogel B. 1998. A cost-effective approach for linking habitats, flow tapes and species requirements. Aquatic Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 8: 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newson M.D. & Newson C.L. 2000. Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Progress in Physical Geography 24: 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasiewicz P. 2001. MesoHABSIM: A concept for application of instream flow models in river restoration planning. Fisheries 26: 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo L. & Armitage P.D. 1997. Species assemblages as descriptors of mesohabitats. Hydrobiologia 344: 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pool G.C. 2002. Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshwater Biol. 47: 641–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn J.M., Hickey C.W. & Linklater W. 1996. Hydraulic influences on periphyton and benthic macroinvertebrates: simulating the effects of upstream bed roughness. Freshwater Biol. 35: 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven P.J., Fox P., Everard M., Holmes N.T.H. & Dawson F.H. 1997. River Habitat Survey: a new system for classifying rivers according to their habitat quality, pp. 215–234. In: Boon P.J. & Howell D.L. (eds), Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable? The Stationery Office, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel L., Richardson J. & Healey M. 2000. Macroinvertebrate community structure along gradients of hydraulic and sedimentary conditions in a large gravel-bed river. Freshwater Biol. 45: 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree K. & Wadeson R. 1998. A geomorhological framework for the assessment of instream flow requirements. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 1: 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šporka F. (ed.) 2003. Slovak Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Checklist and Catalogue of Autecological Notes. Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Bratislava, 590 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C.J.F. & Šmilauer P. 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA, 352 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson J.R., Taylor M., Fryirs K.A. & Brierley G.J. 2001. A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment. Aquatic Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 11: 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbanič G., Toman M.J. & Krušnik C. 2005. Microhabitat type selection of caddishfly larvae (Insect: Trichoptera) in a shallow lowland stream. Hydrobiologia 541: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. & Cushing C.E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadeson R.A. & Rowntree K.E. 1998. Application of the hydraulic biotope concept to the classification of instream habitats. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 1: 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenthworth C.K. 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J. Geol. 30: 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood P. 1998. Reach-scale mesohabitat variations in a small chalk steam under low flow conditions, pp. 31–38. In: Bretschko G. & Helešic J. (eds), Advances in River Bottom Ecology, Blackhuys Publishers, Leiden.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-84506, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Zuzana Pastuchová

  2. Institute of Geography, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 49, SK-81473, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Milan Lehotský & Anna Grešková

Authors
  1. Zuzana Pastuchová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Milan Lehotský
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Grešková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuzana Pastuchová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pastuchová, Z., Lehotský, M. & Grešková, A. Influence of morphohydraulic habitat structure on invertebrate communities (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera). Biologia 63, 720–729 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-008-0116-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-008-0116-x

Key words

Search

Navigation