, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 416–423 | Cite as

Changes in the seasonal rhythm of two forest communities during secondary succession

  • Branislav Schieber


Changes in the seasonal rhythm of two plant phytocoenoses in a submountain beech forest during secondary succession were studied. Investigations were done on four monitoring plots with different stand density over the period of four successive years. The rhythm of the associations Dentario bulbiferae-Fagetum and Carici pilosae-Fagetum reflects the course of succession processes running six years after the human impact (cutting) in the ecosystem. Results of the phenological observations of the understorey species with the focus on the changes in flowering and colour spectrum allowed to make the comparisons between both associations in connection with different phyto-climatic conditions and in dependence on time. The most conspicuous changes in the seasonal rhythm and structure of the examined associations were found in conditions of the former clear-cut, currently in succession phase. A clear decrease (56%) in number of taxons with the dominance > 1% in one association towards the end of the 4-year study period was detected here. Simultaneously, a decrease in the number of flowering species was observed, while the relative rate of species being in the vegetative stage increased considerably (from 6 to 67%) over the growing season. The course of flowering of both of the associations missed discernible trends and peaks as well as colour spectra were partially changed during four monitored successive years on the formerly unstocked area.

Key words

Dentario bulbiferae-Fagetum Carici pilosae-Fagetum beech forest flowering seasonal rhythm secondary succession 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abe T. & Kamo K. 2003. Seasonal changes of floral frequency and composition of flower in two cool temperate secondary forest in Japan. For. Ecol. Manag. 175: 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barna M. 2004. Adaptation of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to different ecological conditions: leaf size variation. Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 35–45.Google Scholar
  3. Battey N.H. 2000. Aspects of seasonality. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1769–1780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bottlíková A. 1975. Fenologická charakteristika vybraných fytocenóz Liptovskej kotliny. Biologické práce, 81 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Bossuyt B. & Hermy M. 2000. Restoration of the understorey layer of recent forest bordering ancient forest. Appl. Veg. Sci. 3: 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunet J. & Oheimb G.V. 1998. Migration of vascular plants to secondary woodlands in southern Sweden. J. Ecol. 86: 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis M.A., Wrage K.J. & Reich P.B. 1998. Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for theory of resource supply and demand. J. Ecol. 86: 652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diekmann M. 1996. Relationship between flowering phenology of perennial herbs and meteorological data in deciduous forests of Sweden. Can.J. Bot. 74: 528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eliáš P. 1987. Size inequality in coenopopulations of a woodland annual Impatients noli-tangere L. Biológia, Bratislava, 42: 881–891.Google Scholar
  10. Falińska K. 1975. Badania fenologiczne jako metoda ekologicznej analizy ekosystemóv. Wiadomości Ekologiczne 21: 213–232.Google Scholar
  11. Hull J.C. 2002. Photosynthetic induction dynamics to sunflecks of four deciduous forest understory herbs with different phenologies. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163: 913–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kawarasaki S. & Hori Y. 2001. Flowering phenology of understory herbaceous species in a cool temperate deciduous forest in Ogawa Forest Reserve, central Japan. J. Plant Res. 114: 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kikuzawa K. 2003. Phenological and morphological adaptations to the light environment in two woody and two herbaceous plant species. Fun. Ecol. 17: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kodrík M. 1997. Height diversity and species biomass on a clear felling site in conditions of a submontane beech forest. Folia dendrologica 24: 39–45.Google Scholar
  15. Kontriš J., Kontrišová O. & Gregor J. 1993. Dynamics of the phytocenoses development of the submountain beech forest stands. I. Phytococenoses. Ekológia, Bratislava, 12: 417–428.Google Scholar
  16. Kubíček F. & Šimonovič V. 1975. Dynamics and phenology of the total biomass of the herbaceous layer in two forest communities. Biológia, Bratislava, 30: 505–522.Google Scholar
  17. Kukla J., Kontriš J., Kontrišová O., Gregor J. & Mihálik A. 1998. Causes of floristical differentiation of Dentario bulbiferae-Fagetum (Zlatník 1935) Hartmann 1953 and Carici pilosae-Fagetum Oberd.1957 associations. Ekológia, Bratislava, 17: 177–186.Google Scholar
  18. Lapin M., Faško P., Melo M., Št’astný P. & Tomlain J. 2002. Klimatické oblasti. In: Miklos, L. (ed), Atlas krajiny Slovenskej republiky. MŽP, Bratislava, CD.Google Scholar
  19. Lieberman D. 1982. Seasonality and phenology in a dry tropical forest in Ghana. J. Ecol. 70: 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lieth H. 1974. Phenology and seasonality modeling. Ecological studies 8. Springer-Verlag, New York, 444 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Marhold K. & Hindák F. 1998. Checklist of non-vascular and vascular plants of Slovakia. VEDA, Bratislava, 687 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Pykälä J. 2004. Immediate increase in plant species richness after clear-cutting of boreal herb-rich forests. App. Veg. Scien. 7: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ritter E., Dalsgaard L. & Einhorn K.S. 2005. Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. For. Ecol. Manag. 206: 15–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Routier M.C. & Lapointe L. 2002. Impact of tree leaf phenology on growth rates and reproduction in the spring flowering species Trilium erectum (Liliaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 89: 500–505.Google Scholar
  25. Sakai S. 2001. Phenological diversity in tropical forests. Pop. Ecol. 43: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schieber B. 1996. Vplyv zakmenenia na fenológiu Dentaria bulbifera L. v assoc. Dentario bulbiferae-Fagetum (Zlatník 1935) Hartmann 1970, pp.77–80. In: Eliáš (ed.), Populačná biológia rastlín IV, SEKOS, Bratislava.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz M.D. 1992. Phenology and springtime surface-layer change. Amer. Met. Soc. 120: 2570–2578.Google Scholar
  28. Sierra G.G., Merino A.P. & Herrero E.A. 1996. Phenology of Hyacinthoides non-scripta (L.) Chouard, Melittis melissophyllum and Symphytum tuberosum L. in 2 deciduous forests in the Cantabrian Mts, northwest Spain. Vegetatio 122: 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Střelec J. 1992. Vplyv ťažbového zásahu v bukovom poraste na zmeny osvetlenia. Lesnícky časopis 38: 551–558.Google Scholar
  30. Tyler G. 2001. Relationships between climate and flowering of eight herbs in a Swedish deciduous forest. Ann. Bot. 87: 623–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wielgolaski F.E. 1999. Starting dates and basic temperatures in phenological observations of plants. Int. J. Biom. 42: 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Branislav Schieber
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Forest EcologySlovak Academy of SciencesZvolenSlovakia

Personalised recommendations