Skip to main content
Log in

The improvement of probiotics efficacy by synergistically acting components of natural origin: a review

Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

The protection of human health as well as the quality and safe food assurance becomes the priority of European research in the sphere of animal production. The negative experiences with the using of antibiotic growth promoters lead to subsequent reduction of their application. It is necessary to replace them by the growth promoters of natural origin, which are able to provide the comparable efficacy and will not contribute to the cumulative contamination of the environment. The probiotics represent an effective alternative to antibiotics and current research should be aimed at improving of their efficacy. This may be achieved by several methods. From the practical point of view, combination with synergistically acting components of natural origin seems to be the best way. Potentiated probiotics are defined as biopreparations containing production strains of microorganisms and synergistically acting components of natural origin which exert their intensified effect through effects on probiotic and gut microorganisms, the gut mucosa and the intestinal environment or immune system. A number of suitable components may be used for this purpose, such as prebiotics, non-specific substrates, plants and their extracts, metabolites of microorganisms and polyunsaturated fatty acids. In this report, the results of application of natural feed additives in animals are reviewed and their valuation for the enhancement of probiotic effectiveness is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarestrup, F.M. 2000. APMIS Suppl. 101: 1–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali-Shtayeh, M.S., Yaghmour, R.M., Faidi, Y.R., Salem, K. & Al-Nuri, M.A. 1998. J. Ethnopathol. 60: 265–271.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anadon, A., Martinez-Larranaga, M.R. & Aranzazu Martinez, M. 2006. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 45: 91–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asahara, T., Nomoto, K., Shimizu, K., Watanuki, M. & Tanaka, R. 2001. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91: 985–996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azaz, A.D., Irtem, H.A., Kurkcuoglu, M. & Baser, K.H. 2004. Z. Naturforsch. 59: 75–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bengmark, S. 2005. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 8: 557–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkei, G. & Gertenbach, W. 2001. Biologische Tiermedizin 3: 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, P. & Wright, F. 2000. Pig Progr. 16: 23–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohmer, B.R., Branner, G.R. & Roth-Maier, D.A. 2005. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 89: 388–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bomba, A., Nemcová, R., Gancarčíková, S., Herich, R. & Kaštel’, R. 1999. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 473: 185–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bomba, A., Nemcová, R., Gancarčíková, S., Herich, R., Pistl, J., Rěvajová, V., Jonecová, Z., Bugarský, A., Levkut, M., Kaštel’, R., Baran, M., Lazar, G., Hluchý, M., Maršálková, S. & Pošivák, J. 2003. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 116: 312–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butaye, P., Devrise, L.A. & Haesebrouck, F. 2003. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 175–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, P.C. 1998. Immunol. Today 19: 244–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C.F., Hammer, K.A. & Riley, T.V. 2006. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 50–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M.E., Maxwell, C.V., Erf, G.F., Brown, D.C. & Wistuba, T.J. 2004. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 1882–1891.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elgayyar, M., Draughon, F.A., Golden, D.A. & Mount, J.R. 2001. J. Food Prot. 64: 1019–1024.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. 1992. The effect of probiotics on the gut microbiology of farm animals, pp. 171–192. In: Wood, B.J.B. (ed.) The Lactic Acid Bacteria, Elsevier Applied Science, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajewska, J., Niemiec, J. & Burlaga, H.R. 2002. Acta Microbiol. Pol. 51: 71–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gancarčíková, S., Nemcová, R., Bomba, A., Pecúch, P. & Hegeduš, I. 2002. Slov. Chov. 2: 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannenas, I., Florou-Paneri, P., Papazahariadou, M., Christaki, E., Botsoglou, N.A., & Spais, A.B. 2003. Arch. Tierernahr. 57: 99–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, G.R. & Roberfroid, M.B. 1995. J. Nutr. 125: 1401–1412.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C. 1999. Feed International (April): 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greathead, H. 2003. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 62: 279–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, F., Madrid, J., Garcia, V., Orengo, J. & Megias, M.D. 2004. Poult. Sci. 83: 169–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda, M., Hashimoto, H., He, F., Morita, H. & Hosono, A. 1996. J. Dairy Sci. 79: 745–749.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J.R., Spencer, J.L. & Modler, H.W. 1997. Poult. Sci. 76: 445–451.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaveerach, P., Keuzenkamp, D.A., Lipman, L.J. & Van Knapen, F. 2004. Poult. Sci. 83: 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilsley, S., Miller, H. & Kamel, C. 2005. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 82–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamroz, D. & Kamel, C. 2002. J. Anim. Sci. 80(Suppl. 1): 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B.B. 1998. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 7: 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankaanpaa, P.E., Salminen, S.J., Isolauri, E. & Lee, Y.K. 2001. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 194: 149–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kankaanpaa, P.E., Yang, B., Kallio, H., Isolauri, E. & Salminen, S.J. 2004. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumprecht, I. & Zobač, P. 1998. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 43: 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakis, S.C., Sariss, K., Lekkas, S., Tsinas, A.C., Giannakopoulos, C., Alexopoulos, C. & Saoulidis, K. 1998. Control of post weaning diarrhoea syndrome of piglets by in feed application of Origanum essential oils, p. 218. In: Proceedings of The 15th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, Volume III, Poster Presentations, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeLeu, R.K., Brown, I.L., Hu, Y., Bird, A.R., Jackson, M., Esterman, A. & Young, G.P. 2005. J. Nutr. 135: 996–1001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Losa, R. & Williams, P. 2000. Int. Pig Top. 16: 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanilla, E.G., Martin, M., Baucells, F., Perez, J.F., Kamel, C., Gasa, J. 2002. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanilla, E.G., Perez, J.F., Kamel, C., Baucells, F. & Gasa, J. 2004. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 3210–3218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marotta, F., Barreto, R., Wu, C.C., Naito, Y., Gelosa, F., Lorenzetti, A., Yoshioka, M. & Fesce, E. 2005. Clin. J. Dig. Dis. 6: 193–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W., Verstegen, A. & Wiliams, B.A. 2002. Anim. Biotechnol. 13: 113–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, S. 2000. Pig Progr. 16: 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mordenti, A. 1986. Information Zootechnology 32: 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourey, A. & Canillac, N. 2002. Food Contr.: 289–292.

  • Nader de Macías, M.E., Romero, N.C., Apella, M.C., González, S.N. & Oliver, G. 1993. J. Food Prot. 56: 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namkung, H., Li, M., Gong, J., Yu, H., Cottrill, M., & De Lange, C.F. 2004. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84: 697–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemcová, R., Bomba, A., Gancarčíková, S., Herich, R. & Guba, P. 1999. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 112: 225–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nemcová, R., Bomba, A., Gancarčíková, S., Reiffová, K., Guba, P., Koščová, J., Jonecová, Z., Sciranková, L’. & Bugarský, A. 2006. Vet. Res. Commun. (in press).

  • Ogawa, T., Asai, Y., Sakamoto, H. & Yasuda, K. 2006a. Br. J. Nutr. 95: 430–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, T., Asai, Y., Tamai, R., Makimura, Y., Sakamoto, H., Hashikawa, S. & Yasuda, K. 2006b. Clin Exp. Immunol. 143: 103–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Partanen, K.H. & Mroz, Z. 1999. Nutr. Res. Rev. 12: 117–145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepeljnjak, S., Kosalec, I., Kalodera, Z. & Blazevic, N. 2005. Acta Pharm. 55: 417–422.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perdigón, G., Nader de Macías, M.E., Alvarez, S., Oliver, G. & de Ruiz Holgado, A.A.P. 1991. J. Dairy Res. 57: 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollmann, D.S., Danielson, D.M., Wren, W.B., Peo, E.R. & Shahani, K.M. 1980. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 629–637.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ringo, E. & Gatesoupe, F.J. 1998. Aquaculture 160: 177–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Révajová, V., Pistl, J., Kaštel’, R., Bindas, L., Magic, D., Sr., Levkut, M., Bomba, A. & Sajbidor, J. 2001. Arch. Tierernahr. 54: 315–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberfroid, M.B. 1998. Br. J. Nutr. 80(Suppl. 2): 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M., Galletti, G.C., Bocchini, P. & Carnacini, A. 1998. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46: 3741–3746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samarasinghe, K., Wenk, C., Silva, K.F.S.T. & Gunasekera, J.M.D.M. 2003. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16: 1495–1500.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxelin, M., Grenov, B., Svensson, U., Fondén, R., Reniero, R. & Mattila-Sandholm, T. 1999. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 10: 387–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, S.B., Verstegen, M.W., Kim, I.H., Kwon, O.S. & Verdonk, J.M. 2005. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 59: 419–427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmering, R. & Blaut, M. 2001. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55: 19–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, P., Wenk, C., Dawson, K.A. & Newman, K.E. 2000. Poult. Sci. 79: 205–211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stavric, S. & Kornegay, E.T. 1995. Microbial probiotic for pigs and poultry, pp. 205–231. In: Wallace, R. J. & Chesson, A. (eds) Biotechnology in Animal Feeds and Animal Feeding, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šuškovič, J., Kos, B., Goreta, J. & Matošič, S. 2001. Food. Technol. Biotechnol. 39: 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiloyiannis, V.K., Kyriakis, S.C., Vilemmas, J. & Sarris, K. 2001. Res. Vet. Sci. 70: 287–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy, K.M., Probert, H.M., Smejkal, C.V. & Gibson, G.R. 2003. Drug Discov. Today 8: 692–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valsaraj, R., Pushpangadan, P., Smitt, U.V., Adseren, A. & Nyman, U. 1997. J. Ethnopathol. 58: 75–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaško, L. & Kaštel’, R. 2004. Slov. Vet. Gas. 1: 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waihenya, R.K., Mtambo, M.M.A., Nkwengulila, G. & Minga, U.M. 2002. J. Ethnopharmacol. 79: 317–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W.A. & Duffy, L.C. 1998. J. Nutr. Biochem. 9: 668–675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, B.M. & Bilkei, G. 2004. Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd. 15: 178–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzl, B., Girrbach, S. & Roller, M. 2005. Br. J. Nutr. 93: S49–S55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, G.E. & Wilson, D. 1997. Indian J. Indg. Med. 18: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.A., Newman, M.C., Cromwell, G.L. & Lindemann, M.D. 2002. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 2619–2628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadava, J.N.S., Gupta, S., Ahmad, I., Varma, N. & Tandon, J.S. 1995. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 65: 1177–1181.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alojz Bomba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bomba, A., Jonecová, Z., Koščová, J. et al. The improvement of probiotics efficacy by synergistically acting components of natural origin: a review. Biologia 61, 729–734 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0149-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0149-y

Key words

Navigation