Abstract
Willows (e.g. Salix caprea L.) are deciduous and richly branched shrubs or small trees. Salix caprea shows a high adaptability to different habitat conditions. One way of evaluating this adaptability is to measure willow biomass and production. Young plants of S. caprea were sampled from the bottom of an artificial lagoon in which sediments removed from the local Vajgar fishpond were deposited. The bottom of the lagoon was overgrown by vegetation dominated by seedlings of the willows S. caprea and S. aurita. Willows grew in the lagoon at average density of 58 plants per m2. The biomass production and growth of S. caprea were determined for 15 samples (collected from 315 individuals) during the growing season. Annual net dry matter production in the whole community was estimated for 2.7 kg m−2. Willows are generally considered to be fast-growing plants. The highest RGR of willows recorded by us was 0.03 to 0.04 g g−1 d−1 both in the stems and roots. This value was often recorded from July to August.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergman, M., Iason, G.R. & Hester, A.J. 2005. Frediny patterns by roe deer and rabbits on pine, willow and biích in retation to spatial arrangement. Oikos 109: 513–520.
Castro-Díez, P. Montserrat-Martí, G. & Cornelissen J.H.C. 2003. Trade-offs between phenology, relative growth rate, life form and seed mass among 22 Mediterranean woody species. Plant Ecology 166: 117–129.
Cleveland, W.S. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing Scatterplots. J. Americ. Stat. Assoc. 74: 829–836.
Cleveland, W.S. 1994. Visualizing data. Hobart Press, Summit, New Jersey, U.S.A., pp.280.
Dykyjová, D. & Úlehlová, B. 1978. Structure and chemistry of the fishpond bottom, pp. 141–155. In: Dykyjová, D. & Květ, J. (eds), Pond littoral ecosystems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J.G. & Hunt, R. 1989. Comparative plant ecology: A functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, London, pp 506–507.
Faliński, J.B. 1997. Declines in populations of Salix caprea L. during forest regeneration after strong herbivore pressure. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 66: 87–109.
Hejný, B. & Slavík, S. 1990. Flora of the Czech Republic-2. Academia, Praha, pp 472–473.
Hees, A.F.M., & van, Clerkx, A.P.P.M. 2003. Shanding and root-shoot telations in saplings of silver birch, pedunculate oak and beech. For. Ecol. Manage. 176: 439–448.
Hunt, R. 1978. Plant growth analysis. Studies in Biology No. 96, Edward Arnold, London, 246 pp.
Hunt, R. 1982. Plant growth curves. Edvard Arnold, London, pp. 2–247.
Klute A. (ed.) 1996. Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical methods, 2nd ed., Madison, WI., Soil Science Society of America.
Kopp, R.F., White, E.H., Abrahamson, L.P., Nowak, C.A., Zsuffa, L. & Burns, K.F. 1993. Willow biomass trials in central New York State. Biomass and Bioenergy 5: 179–187.
Kopp, R.F., Abrahamson, L.P., White, E.H., Nowak, C.A., Zsuffa, L. & Burns, K.F. 1996. Woodgrass spacing and fertilization effects on wood biomass production by a willow clone. Biomass and Bioenergy 11: 451–457.
Kopp, R.F., Abrahamson, L.P., White, E.H., Burns, K.F. & Nowak, C.A. 1997. Cutting cycle and spacing effect on biomass production by a willow clone in New York. Biomass and Bioenergy 12: 313–319.
Kuzovkina, Y.A. & Quigley, M.F. 2005. Willows betone wetlands: Uses of Salix L. species for environmental projects. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 162: 183–204.
Květ, J. & Marshall, J.K. 1971. Assessment of leaf area and other assimilating plant surface, pp 517–546. In: Šesták, Z., Čatský, J. & Jarvis, P.G. (eds), Plant photosynthetic production. Manuals of methods. Dr. W. Junk N.V. Publishers, The Hague.
Květ, J., Ondok, J. P. & Nečas, J. 1971. Methods of growth analysis, pp 343–384. In:Šesták, Z., Čatský, J. & Jarvis, P.G. (eds), Plant photosynthetic production. Manuals of methods, Dr. W. Junk N.V. Publishers., The Hague.
Labrecque, M. & Teodorescu, T.I. 2005. Field performance and biomass production of 12 willow and poplar clonek in short-rotation coppice in southern Quebec (Canada). Biomass and Bioenergy 29: 1–9.
Lambers, H. & Poorter H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23: 187–261.
Lyr, F. & Garbe, V. 1995. Influence of root temperature on growth of Pinus sylvestris, Fagus sylatica, Tillia cordata and Quercus robur. Trees. 9: 316–322.
Martinková, M. 1976. Transpiration and growth of shoot in some species of genus Salix L. PhD. Thesis, Univ. of Agriculture, Brno, Ms., pp.1–192.
Madsen, P. 1994. Growth and survival of Fagus sylvatica seedlings in relation to light intensity and soil water content. Scand. J. For. Res. 9: 316–322.
Minotta, G. & Pinzauti, S. 1996. Effects of light and soil fertility on growth, leaf chlorophyll content and nutrient use efficiency of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings. For. Ecol. Manage 86: 661–671.
Pokorný, J. & Hauser, V. 1994. Restoration of lakes through sediment removal — Vajgar fish pond, Czech Republic, pp. 141–153. In: Eiseltová, M. (ed.), Restoration of lake ecosystems. IWRB Publication No. 32, Slinbridge, UK.
Prach, K., Květ, J. & Ostrý, I. 1987. Ecological analysis of the vegetation in a summer drained fishpond. Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 22: 43–70.
Renand, P.C., Verheyden-Tixier, H. & Dumont, B. 2003. Damage to saplings by red deer (Servus elaphus): Effect of foliage height and structure. Forest Ecol. Management 181: 31–37.
Sauter, J.J. & Wellenkamp, S. 1998. Seasonal changes in content of starch, protein and sugars in the twing wood of Salix caprea L. Holzforschung 52: 255–262.
Tharakan, P.J., Volk, T.A., Nowak, C.A. & Abrahamson, L.P. 2005. Morphological traits of 30 willow clones and their relationship to biomass production. Can. J. Forest Research-revue 35: 421–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dušek, J., Květ, J. Seasonal dynamics of dry weight, growth rate and root/shoot ratio in different aged seedlings of Salix caprea . Biologia 61, 441–447 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0074-0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0074-0