Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular differentiation of Turkey cattle isolates of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica

  • Published:
Helminthologia

Summary

The most common and widespread liver flukes of the genus Fasciola are Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica. Adults of both species occur in many domestic ruminants and in humans and can cause serious disease. The differential diagnosis of these flukes infection is very important because of their different transmission and epidemiological characteristics. A simple and rapid PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay, using the common restriction enzymes AluI and RsaI, is described to distinguish between both fasciolid species. After the digestion of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1) PCR product with the restriction enzyme AluI, the RFLP profile obtained from F. hepatica revealed two fragments, whereas F. gigantica was not cut. The RsaI digestion generated two fragments from F. gigantica, whereas it did not cut the PCR product from F. hepatica. Results were confirmed with CO1 sequence analysis of both F. hepatica and F. gigantica. The present study suggests that the PCRRFLP method described here can be used for the proper identification of Fasciola species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adlard, R. D., Barker, S. C., Blair, D., Cribb, T. H. (1993): Comparison of the second internal transcribed spacer (ribososmal DNA) from populations and species of Fasciolidae (Digena). Int. J. Parasit., 23: 423–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. J. (1999): The life cycle of Fasciola hepatica. In: DALTON, J. P. (Ed.) Fasciolosis. CAB International Publishing, Oxon, UK, 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkaya, I., Simsek, S. (2010). Prevalence and economic importance of hydatidosis and fasciolosis in slaughtered cattle in Erzurum province of Turkey. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 16: 793–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D., Mcmanus, D. P. (1989): Restriction enzyme mapping of ribosomal DNA can distinguish between fasciolid (liver fluke) species. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 36: 201–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, J., Blair, D., Mcmanus, D. P. (1992): Genetic variants within the genus Echinococcus identified by mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 54: 165–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demirci, M., Korkmaz, M., Kaya, S., Kuman, A. (2003): Fascioliasis in eosinophilic patients in the Isparta region of Turkey. Infection, 31: 15–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erensoy, A., Kuk, S., Ozden, M. (2009): Genetic identification of Fasciola hepatica by ITS-2 sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA in Turkey. Parasitol. Res. 105: 407–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, K., Watanobe, T., Liu, C. X., Init, I., Blair, D., Ohnishi, S., Agatsuma, T. (1997): Mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA indicate that the Japanese Fasciola species is F. gigantica. Parasitol. Res. 83: 220–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. Y., He, B., Wang, C. R., Zhu, X. Q. (2004): Characterisation of Fasciola species from Mainland China by ITS-2 ribosomal DNA sequence. Vet. Parasitol. 120: 75–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Itagaki, T., Tsutsumi, K. (1998): Triploid form of Fasciola in Japan: genetic relationships between Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica determined by ITS-2 sequence of nuclear rDNA. Int. J. Parasitol. 28: 777–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Itagaki, T., Kikawa, M., Sakaguchi, K., Shimo, J., Terasaki, K., Shibahara, T., Fukuda, K. (2005): Genetic characterization of parthenogenic Fasciola sp. in Japan on the basis of the sequences of ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology, 131: 679–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcilla, A., Bargues, M. D., Mas-Coma, S. (2002): A PCR-RFLP assay for the distinction between Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica. Mol. Cel. Prob. 16: 327–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-coma, S., Bargues, M. D. (1997): Human liver flukes: a review. Res. Rev. Parasitol. 57: 145–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcmanus, D. P., Bowles, J. (1996). Molecular genetic approaches to parasite identification: their value in diagnostic parasitology and systematics. Int. J. Parasitol. 26: 687–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., Maniatis, T. (1989): Detection and Analysis of Proteins Expressed from Cloned Genes. Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring, Harbor Laboratory press. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, S., Risvanli, A., Utuk, A. E., Yuksel, M., Saat, N., Koroglu, E. (2007): Evaluation of relationship between repeat breeding and Fasciola hepatica and hydatid cyst infections in cows in Elazig district of eastern Turkey. Res. Vet. Sci. 83: 102–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toparlak, M., Tasci, S., Gul, Y. (1989): Liver fluke infections in cattle slaughtered in Van abattoir. Vet. J. Ankara Univ. 36: 419–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Turhan, O., Korkmaz, M., Saba, R., Kabaaalioglu, A., Inan, D., Mamikoglu, L. (2006). Seroepidemiology of fascioliasis in the Antalya region and uselessness of eosinophil count as a surrogate marker and portable ultrasonography for epidemiological surveillance. Infez Med. 14: 208–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, H., Godekmerdan, A. (2004). Human fasciolosis in Van province, Turkey. Acta Trop. 92: 161–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Simsek.

About this article

Cite this article

Simsek, S., Utuk, A.E. & Balkaya, I. Molecular differentiation of Turkey cattle isolates of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica . Helminthologia 48, 3–7 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-011-0001-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-011-0001-y

Keywords

Navigation