Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Saving the Manx Shearwater Flea Ceratophyllus (Emmareus) fionnus (Insecta: Siphonaptera): The Road to Developing a Recovery Plan for a Threatened Ectoparasite

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Parasitologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 November 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

The Manx shearwater flea Ceratophyllus (Emmareus) fionnus Usher, 1968 is a host-specific parasitic insect apparently restricted to the Isle of Rùm, off the west coast of Scotland. Although C. (E.) fionnus is one of only a small number of insect species endemic to the British Isles, its conservation status has never been evaluated. To enable effective management, the conservation status of the species was assessed.

Methods

The conservation status of C. (E.) fionnus was evaluated using host and distribution records in conjunction with two assessment rubrics; the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, and a flea-specific assessment rubric developed previously.

Results

Ceratophyllus (Emmareus) fionnus was found to be threatened with extinction due to its hyperendemicity on the Isle of Rùm and was classified as vulnerable.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of the assessment, immediate conservation action to protect C. (E.) fionnus is encouraged and a recovery plan is outlined. This includes surveys and studies of the bionomics of the species in conjunction with in-situ management of the known population. The creation of insurance populations through conservation translocations is also encouraged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 21 November 2019

    Due to a processing error, the presentation of Table 1 was incorrect. The corrected table is given below. The original article has been corrected.

References

  1. Aubrook EW (1966) Ischnopsyllus octactenus (Kolenati) (Siphonaptera) from the Isle of Rhum. Entomol Mon Mag 101(1217–1219):286

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooke M (2013) The Manx shearwater. A & C Black, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bush SE, Clayton DH (2018) Anti-parasite behaviour of birds. Philos Trans R Soc B 373(1751):20170196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PA, New TR (2011) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol Conserv 144(11):2647–2655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Checklist Committee (OSNZ) (2010) Checklist of the Birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica, 4th edn. Te Papa Press, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dougherty ER, Carlson CJ, Bueno VM, Burgio KR, Cizauskas CA, Clements CF, Seidel DP, Harris NC (2016) Paradigms for parasite conservation. Conserv Biol 30(4):724–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fowler JA, Furness RW (1987) A genus of feather louse new to the Manx shearwater Puffinus p. puffinus. Seabird 10:50

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fowler JA, Shaw GJ (1990) The Mallophaga of Manx shearwaters Puffinus p. puffinus from Ynys Enlli, Wales. Seabird 12:14–19

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garnick E (1992) Parasite virulence and parasite-host coevolution: a reappraisal. J Parasitol 78(2):381–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Good TC, Zjhra ML, Kremen C (2006) Addressing data deficiency in classifying extinction risk: a case study of a radiation of Bignoniaceae from Madagascar. Conserv Biol 20(4):1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heidrich P, Amengual J, Wink M (1998) Phylogenetic relationships in Mediterranean and North Atlantic shearwaters (Aves: Procellariidae) based on nucleotide sequences of mtDNA. Biochem Syst Ecol 26(1):145–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. IUCN—International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2001) Species Survival Commission. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kwak ML, Mintram K (2017) The tick (Acari: Ixodidae) fauna of Herald’s Beacon Islet, Australia. Exp Appl Acarol 71(1):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwak ML, Reed J (2017) A survey of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from an over-abundant koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) population in south eastern Australia, with an overview of the ticks and mites of koalas. Exp Appl Acarol 73(1):109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwak ML (2018) Australia’s vanishing fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera): a case study in methods for the assessment and conservation of threatened flea species. J Insect Conserv 22(3):545–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwak ML, Heath ACG (2018) Redescription of the kiwi tick Ixodes anatis (Acari: Ixodidae) from New Zealand, with notes on its biology. Exp Appl Acarol 74(2):207–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwak ML, Griffiths J, Barry D, Begent M, Hoang T, Taafua L, Chiovittic A (2018) The first DNA barcodes for the Australian platypus tick Ixodes ornithorhynchi Lucas, 1846 (Acari: Ixodidae) to facilitate conservation efforts for a declining parasite and its host. Acarologia 58(4):845–849

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lockley RM (1930) On the breeding-habits of the Manx shearwater, with special reference to its incubation- and fledging-periods. Br Birds 23(8):202–218

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell PI, Newton SF, Ratcliffe N, Dunn TE (2004) Seabird populations of Britain and Ireland. T. & AD Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murray S, Shewry MC, Mudge GP, Spray S (2003) A survey of Manx shearwaters Puffinus puffinus on Rum, Inner Hebrides in 2001. Atl Seab 5(3):89–100

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ǿigarden T, Mehl RA, Jerstad K (2013) Fleas in the nests of the white-throated dipper, Cinclus cinclus in Norway. Ornis Norv 36(1):61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Palma RL (2017) Phthiraptera (Insecta): a catalogue of parasitic lice from New Zealand. Fauna N Zeal 76:1–400

    Google Scholar 

  23. Palma RL, Pilgrim RLC, Aguilar JS (1997) Ectoparasites from the Balearic shearwater Puffinus yelkouan mauretanicus. Seabird 19(1):51–53

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ratcliffe N, Mitchell I, Varnham K, Verboven N, Higson P (2009) How to prioritize rat management for the benefit of petrels: a case study of the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man. Ibis 151(4):699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rózsa L, Vas Z (2015) Co-extinct and critically co-endangered species of parasitic lice, and conservation-induced extinction: should lice be reintroduced to their hosts? Oryx 49(1):107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Russel HM (1959) Ornithopsylla laetitiae in the Isle of Rhum. Entomol Mon Mag 95:190

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sangster G, Knox AG, Helbig AJ, Parkin DT (2002) Taxonomic recommendations for European birds. Ibis 144(1):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seery DB, Biggins DE, Montenieri JA, Enscore RE, Tanda DT, Gage KL (2003) Treatment of black-tailed prairie dog burrows with deltamethrin to control fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) and plague. J Med Entomol 40(1):718–722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Srivathsan A, Ang A, Vogler AP, Meier R (2016) Fecal metagenomics for the simultaneous assessment of diet, parasites, and population genetics of an understudied primate. Front Zool 13(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stansfield G (1957) The fleas of Skokholm Island. Entomol Mon Mag 93:196–201

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson KR (1987) The ecology of the Manx shearwater, Puffinus puffinus on Rhum, West Scotland. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, p 162

  32. Trolle L, Jensen J-K (2001) The fleas (Siphonaptera) of the Faroes Islands. Frodskaparrit 48(1):135–144

    Google Scholar 

  33. Turk FA (1946) The Siphonaptera of Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly with the description of a new subspecies. Entomol Mon Mag 82:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  34. Usher MB (1968) A new species of bird flea from the Manx Shearwater in Scotland. Entomol Gaz 19(3):173–180

    Google Scholar 

  35. van der Mescht L, le Roux PC, Matthee CA, Raath MJ, Matthee S (2016) The influence of life history characteristics on flea (Siphonaptera) species distribution models. Parasites Vectors 9:178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Whitaker AP (2007) Handbook for the identification of British insects: Fleas (Siphonaptera), 2nd edn. Royal Entomological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Worinell P (1976) The Manx shearwaters of Rhum. Scott Birds 9(2):103–108

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wormell E (1982) The entomology of the Isle of Rhum National Nature Reserve. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 18(1):291–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We kindly thank Erica McAlister and the Natural History Museum (London) for allowing us to use their copyright image of the Manx shearwater flea. We also thank Dominic Funnell for putting us in contact with Tim Marshall who allowed the use of his photograph of the host bird. We are also thankful to the two reviewers who provided constructive criticism and comments that greatly improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mackenzie L. Kwak.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: Due to a processing error, the presentation of Table 1 was incorrect. The original article has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwak, M.L., Heath, A.C.G. & Palma, R.L. Saving the Manx Shearwater Flea Ceratophyllus (Emmareus) fionnus (Insecta: Siphonaptera): The Road to Developing a Recovery Plan for a Threatened Ectoparasite. Acta Parasit. 64, 903–910 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-019-00119-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-019-00119-8

Keywords

Navigation