Acta Parasitologica

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 420–433 | Cite as

Ultrastructure of the digestive system and experimental study of feeding in the monogenean skin and fin parasite Macrogyrodactylus congolensis

  • Safaa Z. Arafa
  • Mohammed M. El-Naggar
  • Graham C. Kearn
Original Paper

Abstract

In the present study, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been used to study the ultrastructure of the digestive system, namely the pharynx, oesophageal glands and intestine, of the monogenean skin and fin parasite Macrogyrodactylus congolensis. The pharynx consists of an anterior highly muscular region and a posterior mainly glandular syncytial region. The anterior region is provided with six pharyngeal papillae, the centre of each of which is occupied by electron dense secretory bodies, identical with those in the posterior region of the pharynx. The intestine has an uninterrupted syncytial gastrodermis and the luminal surface is provided with many unbranched lamellae. The intestine of living specimens contains large and small granules which give it a reddish brown colour. Large particles, presumed to be lipid droplets, and small granules, presumed to be melanin granules, were found in the gastrodermis and in the intestinal lumen. Parasites were induced to feed and then preserved for TEM at the following intervals: just after feeding, 30 min after feeding, 1 h 30 min after feeding and 2 h after feeding. The specimens were then processed for TEM and sections cut through the intestine of each specimen were examined with the transmission electron microscope. Three types of vacuoles (V1, V2, V3) were detected in the gastrodermis. Vacuoles V1 have thick walls and are likely to be endocytotic, enclosing luminal contents at the surface of the gastrodermis. V2 vacuoles may be lysosomes that fuse with V1 vacuoles. V3 vacuoles may serve to dispose of residual digestive material into the lumen.

Keywords

Monogenea Macrogyrodactylus congolensis ultrastructure digestive system feeding digestion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arafa S.Z. 2011. Ultrastructure of musculature of the marginal hooklets of Macrogyrodactylus congolensis, a monogenean skin parasite from the catfish Clarias gariepinus. Acta Parasitologica, 56, 122–130. DOI: 10.2478/s11686-011-0020-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arafa S.Z., El-Naggar M.M., Kearn G.C. 2003. Scanning electron microscope observations on the monogenean skin parasite Macrogyrodactylus congolensis (Prudhoe, 1957) Yamaguti, 1963. Acta Parasitologica, 48, 163–171.Google Scholar
  3. Cable J., Harris P.D., Tinsley R.C. 1997. Melanin deposition in the gut of the monogenean Macrogyrodactylus polypteri, Malmberg 1957. International Journal for Parasitology, 27, 1323–1331. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00089-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cable J., Tinsley R.C., Harris P.D. 2002. Survival, feeding and embryo development of Gyrodactylus gasterostei (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae). Parasitology, 124, 53–68. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182001008861.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. El-Naggar M.M., Arafa S.Z., El-Abbassy S.A., Kearn G.C. 2001a. Chaetotaxy of the monogeneans Macrogyrodactylus clarii and M. congolensis from the gills and skin of the catfish Clarias gariepinus in Egypt, with a note on argentophilic elements in the nervous system. Folia Parasitologica, 48, 201–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. El-Naggar M.M., Arafa S.Z., El-Abbassy S.A., Stewart M.T., Halton D.W. 2007. Neuromusculature of Macrogyrodactylus congolensis, a monogenean skin parasite of the Nile catfish Clarias gariepinus. Parasitology Research, 100, 265–279. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-006-0235-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Naggar M.M., El-Naggar A.M., El-Abbassy S.A. 2001b. Microhabitat and movement of the viviparous monogeneans Gyrodactylus alberti, Macrogyrodactylus clarii and M. congolensis from the Nile catfish Clarias gariepinus. Journal of the EgyptianGerman Society of Zoology, Invertebrate Zoology and-Parasitology, 35(D), 169–187.Google Scholar
  8. El-Naggar M.M., Kearn G.C., Hagras A.E., Arafa S.Z. 1999. On some anatomical features of Macrogyrodactylus congolensis, a viviparous monogenean ectoparasite of the catfish Clarias gariepinus from Nile water. Journal of the Egyptian German Society of Zoology, Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, 2(D), 1–24.Google Scholar
  9. El-Naggar M.M., Serag H.M. 1987. Redescription of Macrogyrodactylus clarii Gussev 1961, a monogenean gill parasite of Clarias lazera in Egypt. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research. Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 5, 257–271.Google Scholar
  10. Fournier A. 1978. Euzetrema knoepffleri: evidence for a synchronous cycle of gastrodermal activity and an apocrine-like release of the residues of digestion. Parasitology, 77, 19–26. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182000048678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halton D.W. and Stranock, S.D. 1976a. The fine structure and histochemistry of the caecal epithelium of Calicotyle kröyeri (Monogenea: Monopisthocotylea). International Journal for Parasitology, 6, 253–263. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(76)90043-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halton D.W. and Stranock, S.D. 1976b. Ultrastructure of the foregut and associated glands of Calicotyle kroyeri (Monogenea: Monopisthocotylea). International Journal for Parasitology, 6, 517–526. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(76)90091-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halton, D. W. 1975. Intracellular digestion and cellular defecation in a monogenean, Diclidophora merlangi. Parasitology, 70, 331–340. DO: 10.1017/S0031182000052100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kearn G.C. 1963. Feeding in some monogenean skin parasites: Entobdella soleae on Solea solea and Acanthocotyle sp. on Raia clavata. Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom, 43, 749–766. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315400025662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kearn G.C. 1979. Studies on gut pigment in skin-parasitic monogeneans, with special reference to the monocotylid Dendromonocotyle kuhlii. International Journal for Parasitology, 9, 545–552. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(79)90011-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kearn G.C., Al-Sehaibani M.A., Whittington I.D., Evans-Gowing, R., Cribb B.W. 1996. Swallowing of sea water and its role in egestion in the monogenean Entobdella soleae, a skin parasite of the common sole (Solea solea), with observations on other monogeneans and on a freshwater temnocephalan. Journal of Natural History, 30, 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khalil, L.F. 1970. Further studies on Macrogyrodactylus polypteri, a monogenean on the African freshwater fish Polypterus senegalus. Journal of Helminthology, 44, 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kritsky D.C., Bourguet D., Spall, R.D. 1994. Fine structure of the gastrodermis of two species of Gyrodactylus (Monogenoidea: Polyonchoinea, Gyrodactylidae). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 113, 43–51. DOI: 10.2307/3226578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malmberg G. 1957. On a new genus of viviparous trematodes. Arkiv för Zoologi, 10, 17–330.Google Scholar
  20. Mo T.A. 1994. Status of Gyrodactylus salaris problems and reseach in Norwy. In: Parasitic Diseases of Fishes (edit by Pike, A. W. and Lewis, J. W.). Samara Publishing Limited, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Prudhoe, S. 1957. Trematoda. Prac National de l’Upema. I. Mission G. F. et R. Witte en collaboration avec. W. Adam, A. Janssens, L. Van Meet et R. Verheyen (1946–1949), 48, 1–28.Google Scholar
  22. Sterud E., Harris P.D., Bakke T.A. 1998. The influence of Gyrodactylus salaris Malmberg, 1957 (Monogenea) on the epidermis of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L, and brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill): experimental studies. Journal of Fish Diseases, 21, 257–263. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.1998.00099.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tinsley R.C. 1973. Ultrastructure studies on the form and function of the gastrodermis of Protopolystoma xenopi (Monogenoidea: Polyopisthocotylea). Biological Bulletin, 144, 541–555. DOI: 10.2307/1540307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watson N.A., Whittington I.D. 1996. Ultrastructure of the gastrodermis and posterior gut pockets of Concinnocotyla australensis (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) and comparison with another polystomatid, Neopolystoma spratti. Folia Parasitologica, 43, 277–286.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Safaa Z. Arafa
    • 1
  • Mohammed M. El-Naggar
    • 1
  • Graham C. Kearn
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoology Department, Faculty of SciencesMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich Research ParkNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations