Acta Parasitologica

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 388–396 | Cite as

Fur mites of the family Listrophoridae (Acariformes: Sarcoptoidea) associated with South American sigmodontine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae)

  • Bożena Sikora
  • Andre V. Bochkov


Six species of 3 genera belonging to the fur mite family Listrophoridae were recorded on skins of South American rodents of the cricetid subfamily Sigmodontinae housed in the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (Munich, Germany). Among them, Amlistrophorus geoxus sp. nov. from Geoxus valdivianus from Chile is described as a new for science, and males of Prolistrophorus amazonicus amazonicus Fain, 1971 are recorded for the first time. The full generic status for the subgenus Amlistrophorus of the genus Prolistrophorus proposed by Fain et al. (1996) is not supported, and Prolistrophorus musculinus Fain, 1973 stat. nov. (formerly a subspecies of P. amazonicus) from Mus musculus (Rodentia: Muridae) from Suriname is raised to species status. New hosts are recorded for the following species: Prolistrophorus argentinus (Hirst, 1921) from Holochilus brasiliensis and H. chacarius from Argentina, P. amazonicus from Calomys callosus from Argentina and Bolivia, C. laucha and C. musculinus from Argentina, P. akodon Fain and Lukoschus, 1982 from Akodon montensis from Argentina, P. nectomys Fain, 1971 from Nectomys palmipes from Peru and Melanomys caliginosus from Panama, and Sclerolistrophorus oxymycteris Fain, 1976 from Oryzomys laticeps from Brazil.


Amlistrophorus geoxus sp. nov. fur-mites Listrophoridae Cricetidae Sigmodontinae South America 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bochkov A.V. 2010. A review of mammal associated Psoroptidia (Acariformes: Astigmata). Acarina, 18, 99–260.Google Scholar
  2. Bochkov A.V. 2011. Evolution of parasitism in mammal-associated mites of the Psoroptidia group (Acari: Astigmata). Entomological Review, 9, 1206–1215. DOI: 10.1134/S00138738 11090168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bochkov A.V., OConnor B.M. 2005. The life-cycle of Hemigalichus chrotogale sp. nov. (Acari: Listrophoridae), with comparative observations on listrophorid morphology. Journal of Natural History, 39, 3811–3832. DOI: 10.1080/00222930500439559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fain A. 1970. Diagnoses de nouveaux Lobalgides and Listrophorides (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines, 81, 271–300.Google Scholar
  5. Fain A. 1973. Les Listrophoridés d’Amérique Néotropicale (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). 1. Familles Listrophoridae et Chirodiscidae. Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 49, 1–149.Google Scholar
  6. Fain A. 1976. Nouveaux acariens parasites de la superfamille Listrophoroidea (Astigmates). Acta Zoologica et Pathologica Antverpiensia, 64, 37–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fain A. 1981. Notes sur les Listrophoridae (Acari, Astigmata). I. Distribution geographique, caracteres morphologiques et cle des genres. Acarologia, 7, 305–312.Google Scholar
  8. Fain A., Lukoschus F.S. 1980. The genus Sclerolistrophorus Fain, 1976 (Acari: Listrophoridae). Bulletin and Annales de la Societe Royale Entomologie Belgique, 116, 29–34.Google Scholar
  9. Fain A., Lukoschus F.S. 1982. Diagnoses de nouveaux Listrophorides néotropic aux. Bulletin and Annales de la Societe Royale Entomologie Belgique, 118, 100–101.Google Scholar
  10. Fain A., Lukoschus F.S. 1983. Notes sur les acariens pilicoles des genres Afrolistrophorus Fain, 1970 et Spalacarus Fain, 1980 (Astigmata: Listrophoridae). Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 55, 1–18.Google Scholar
  11. Fain A., Lukoschus F.S. 1984. New observations on the genus Prolistrophorus Fain, 1970 (Acari: Astigmata: Listrophoridae). Systematic Parasitology, 6, 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fain A., Ritzi C.N. 2001. Observations on some astigmatid mites (Acari) parasitic on rodents (Rodentia) from Peru, with description of three new species. International Journal of Acarology, 27, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fain A., Zanatta-Coutinho M.T., Fonseca M.T. 1996. Observations on a small collection of mites (Acari) parasitic on mammals from Brazil. Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 66, 57–63.Google Scholar
  14. Grandjean F. 1939. La chaetotaxie des pattes chez les Acaridiae. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 64, 50–60.Google Scholar
  15. Griffiths D.A., Atyeo W.T., Norton R.A., Lynch C.A. 1990. The idiosomal chaetotaxy of astigmatid mites. Journal of Zoology (London), 220, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirst S. 1921. On some new or little known acari, mostly parasitic in man. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 91, 375–378.Google Scholar
  17. Lizaso N.M. 1975. Acarol pilicolas do Brasil (Acarina: Listrophoroidea). Memorial do Instituto Butantan, 39, 73–77.Google Scholar
  18. Lizaso N.M. 1977. Acarol pilicolas do Brasil. II. Descrição de Prolistrophorus inornatus sp. n. (Acarina: Listrophoridae). Memorial do Instituto Butantan, 40/41, 205–210.Google Scholar
  19. Musser G.G., Carleton M.D. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea. In: (Eds. D.E. Wilson and M.D. Reeder, 3rd ed.) Mammal species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 894–1531.Google Scholar
  20. Norton R.A. 1998. Morphological evidence for the evolutionary origin of Astigmata (Acari: Acariformes). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 22, 559–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal MorphologyAdam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of BiologyPoznańPoland
  2. 2.Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Museum of ZoologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations