Evaluation of the boundary layer morning transition using the CL-31 ceilometer signals
- 134 Downloads
The morning transition of the atmospheric boundary layer from nighttime to daytime conditions was investigated using the Vaisala’s CL-31 ceilometer, located at Magurele, Romania (44.35°N, 26.03°E). Based on the 5-days backward trajectories, we rejected those measurements which were related to the intrusions of long-range transported particles. In the several discussed cases, which are representative for the morning transition in spring and summer seasons over Magurele, the increasing depth of the boundary layer related to the local aerosol load was well discernible. The dynamic change of its depth was estimated with errors using a simple method based on finding the minimum of the first derivative of the ceilometer signal. In the summer, the increase of the boundary layer depth due to the morning transition from the nighttime to daytime conditions starts on average of about 80 min earlier and the growth rate of this depth is 143 ± 6 m/h and about 37% slower than in the spring case.
Key wordsboundary layer depth morning transition ceilometer
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Münkel, C., and R. Roininen (2008), Mixing layer height assessment with a compact lidar ceilometer. In: The 88th Annual Meeting Symposium on Recent Developments in Atmospheric Applications of Radar and Lidar, 20–24 January 2008, New Orleans, USA, Poster session P2.2.Google Scholar
- Nemuc, A., I.S. Stachlewska, J. Vasilescu, A. Gorska, D. Nicolae, and C. Talianu (2014), Optical properties of long-range transported volcanic ash over Romania and Poland during Eyjafjallajökull eruption in 2010, Acta Geophys. 62,2, 350–366, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-013-0180-7 (this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ritter, C., and R. Neuber (2012), Private communication 20-24.08.2012.Google Scholar
- Sicard, M., C. Pérez, F. Rocadenbosch, J.M. Baldasano, and D. Garcia-Vizcaino (2006), Mixed-layer depth determination in the Barcelona coastal area from regular lidar measurements: methods, results and limitations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 119,1, 135–157, DOI: 10.1007/s10546-005-9005-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsaknakis, G., A. Papayannis, P. Kokkalis, V. Amiridis, H.D. Kambezidis, R.E. Mamouri, G. Georgoussis, and G. Avdikos (2011), Inter-comparison of lidar and ceilometer retrievals for aerosol and Planetary Boundary Layer profiling over Athens, Greece, Atmos. Meas. Tech. 4,6, 1261–1273, DOI: 10.5194/amt-4-1261-2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ungureanu, I., S. Stefan, and D. Nicolae (2010), Investigation of the cloud cover and Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) characteristics using ceilometer CL-31, Rom. Rep. Phys. 62,2, 396–404.Google Scholar
- Wallace, J.M., and P.V. Hobbs (2006), Atmospheric Science: An introductory Survey, 2nd ed., Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Wiegner, M., S. Emeis, V. Freudenthaler, B. Heese, W. Junkermann, C. Münkel, K. Schäfer, M. Seefeldner, and S. Vogt (2006), Mixing layer height over Munich, Germany: Variability and comparisons of different methodologies, J. Geophys. Res. 111, D13201, DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar