Advertisement

Central European Journal of Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 714–721 | Cite as

Analysis of ultrastructural synaptic apparatus in parietal neurocortical and midbrain neurons in animals with experimental mild craniocerebral injury prior to and following magneto-laser therapy

  • Olena Zubkova
  • Vira Semenova
  • Ivan Samosiuk
  • Walery ZukowEmail author
  • Viktoria Vaslovich
  • Natalia Samosiuk
Research Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Magnetic laser therapy is widely used in general medicine in a complex treatment of many diseases. This is due to its unique and versatile biological properties; it which activates intracellular metabolic processes and expedites the repair of damaged tissues. Magnetic laser therapy is an important area of modern theoretical and clinical physiotherapy; It is used in the treatment of dermatological, general surgical, endocrinological, and dental diseases; pain syndromes; and other conditions.

Objectives

Our objective is to assess the therapeutic efficacy of magnetic laser therapy in experimental mild traumatic brain injury in rabbits.

Material and Methods

We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of magnetic laser therapy in experimental mild traumatic brain injury in 20 rabbits based on an analysis of ultrastructure of synaptic apparatus of neurons in the parietal and midbrain regions. Magnetic transcranial laser influence exercised by our developed method.

Results

The course of magnetic laser therapy led to statistically significant changes in quantitative characteristics of the ultrastructural components in the synaptic apparatus of neurons that express the activation of compensatory processes and restoration of structural and functional integrity of the synaptic apparatus of neurons in experimental mild traumatic brain injury.

Keywords

Experimental mild craniocerebral injury Magnetic laser therapy Synaptic apparatus of neurons Morphometry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Aganova JeA, Uranova NA. Morfometricheskij analiz sinapticheskih kontaktov v perednej limbicheskoj kore pri jendogennyh psihozah. [Morphometric analysis of synaptic contacts in the anterior limbic cortex in endogenous psychoses]. Zhurn. nevropatologii i psihiatrii im. SS Korsakova. 1990. 90.10: 53–57. (Article in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bujlin VA. Lazernaja refleksoterapija. [Laser acupuncture]. M. NPLC. Tehnika. 2002. 34 s. (Book in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bogolepov NN. Ul’trastruktura sinapsov v norme i patologii. [Ultrastructure of synapses in health and disease]. M. Medicina. 1975. 96 s. (Book in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Illarionov VE. Osnovy lazernoj terapii. [Principles of Laser Therapy]. M. Izd-vo Respekt. 1992. 129 s. (Book in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kopiev OV. Ul’trastrukturnyj i ul’tracitohimicheskij analiz jeksperimental’nogo sotrjasenija mozga. Avtoref. dis. … doktora med. nauk. [Ultrastructural and ultracitochimic analysis of the experimental barain concussion: Abstract doctor thesis]. K. 1988. 46 s. (Book in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lapach SN, Chubenko AV, Babich NN. Statisticheskie metody v mediko-biologicheskih issledovanijah s ispol’zovaniem Exsel. [Statistical methods in medical and biological research using Exsel]. K. MORION. 2000. 320 s. (Book in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Nosov AT, Shama∈v MI, Rashe∈va IG. Morfologichni zmini golovnogo mozku. [Morphological changes in the brain]. Pisljaradiacijna encefalopatija. Eksperimental’ni doslidzhennja ta klinichni sposterezhennja. K. 1993. 22–41. (Article in Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Moskvin SV. Jeffektivnost’ lazernoj terapii. [Efficiency laser therapy]. M. NPLC. Tehnika. 2003. 254 s. (Book in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zubkova OV, Nosov AT, Semenova VM, Vaslovich VV. Ocinka efektyvnosti mahnitno-lazernoho vplyvu na korkovi ta mezencefal”ni viddily holovnoho mozku kroliv za zminamy u synaptychnomu aparati nejroniv. [Evaluating the effectiveness of magneticlaser effect on cortical and mezencefal parts of the brain of rabbits the changes in synaptic apparatus of neurons]. Ukrayins”kyj zhurn. ekstremal”noyi medycyny im. Mozhayeva HO. 2011. 2: 86–92. (Article in Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Pat. 29731 Ukrayina, MPK A 61 N 5/06 A 61 N 2/00. Sposib likuvannya xvoryx z lehkoyu cherepnomozkovoyu travmoyu za metodom Zubkovoyi OV ta Samosyuka IZ. [Method of treatment of patients with mild brain injury by using Zubkova OV and Samosiuk IZ]. Zubkova OV, Samosyuk IZ. N 10638/07. zayavl. 29.09.07. opubl. 25.01.08. Byul. № 2. (Patent in UkrainiGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Pedachenko YeH. Nevidkladna dopomoha pry cherepno-mozkovij travmi v Ukrayini. [Emergency aid for brain injury in Ukraine]. IV z’yizd nejroxirurhiv Ukrayiny. 23–30 trav. 2008. Materialy z’yizdu. Dnepropetrovs”k. 2008. 4. (Article in Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Semchenko VV, Stepanov SS. Strukturnye aspekty funkcional’noj aktivnosti sinapsov kory bol’shogo mozga v rannem postreanimacionnom periode. [Structural aspects of the functional activity of the synapses of the cerebral cortex in the early postresuscitation period]. Bjul. jeksperim. biologii i mediciny. 1989. 2: 164–166. (Article in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Semchenko VV, Ereniev SI, Stepanov SS, Genne RI. Sinaptoarhitektonika kory bol’shogo mozga cheloveka pri hronicheskoj gipoksii i jepileptizacii mozga. [Sinaptoarhitectonica human cerebral cortex during chronic hypoxia and brain epileptization]. Arh. anatomii, gistologii i jembriologii. 1990. 7: 40–43. (Article in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Pedachenko EG, Samosiuk IZ, Zubkova OV et al. Transkranial’na magnitolazerna terapija v eksperimenti. [Transcranial magnitolaser therapy experiment]. Zb. nauk. prac’ spivrobitnikiv KMAPO im. PL Shupika. K. 2001. Vip. 10. kn. 3: 281–287. (Article in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Samosiuk IZ, Chuhraev NV, Zubkova ST et al. Fizicheskie metody v lechenii i medicinskoj reabilitacii bol’nyh i invalidov. [Physical methods of treatment and medical rehabilitation of sick and disabled]. Ed. Samosiuk IZ. K. Zdorov’ja. 2004. 624 s. (Book in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Frumkina LE, Jakovleva NI, Bogolepov NN. Mehanizmy razvitija sinapsa, kak osnova ego involjucii. Mechanisms of synapse development, as the basis of its involution]. Bjul. jeksperim. biologii i mediciny. 1993. 116: 214–217. (Article in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Calverley RKS. Jones DJ. Contributions of dendritic spines and perforated synaptses to synaptic plasticity. Brain Res Rev. 1990. 15: 215–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Gray EG. Electron microscopy of presynaptic organelles of the spinal cord. J Anat L 1963. 97: 101–106Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Limansky Y, Gulyar S, Samosiuk I et al. Puncture methods of physiotherapy and their scientific rationale. Journal of Health Sciences. 2011; 1(4): 185–210Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Samosiuk I, Chukhraev N, Pisanko O et al. Ecophysical factors based on short wave frequency and singlet-oxygen therapy. Journal of Health Sciences. 2011; 1(3): 137–146Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Samosiuk I, Chukhraeva E, Samosiuk N, Zukow W. Low-intensity physical factors in the treatment of and medical rehabilitation of patients with type 2 diabetes and their effects on lipid metabolism. Journal of Health Sciences. 2012; 2(4): 27–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olena Zubkova
    • 1
  • Vira Semenova
    • 1
  • Ivan Samosiuk
    • 2
  • Walery Zukow
    • 3
    Email author
  • Viktoria Vaslovich
    • 1
  • Natalia Samosiuk
    • 2
  1. 1.State Enterprise Institute of Neurosurgery named acad. AP Romodanov Academy Medical Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine
  2. 2.National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education named PL ShupykKyivUkraine
  3. 3.Kazimierz Wielki UniversityBydgoszczPoland

Personalised recommendations