Advertisement

Central European Journal of Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 687–693 | Cite as

Adherence to osteoporosis guideline: survey among Czech general practitioners

  • Magda Vytrisalova
  • Leos FuksaEmail author
  • Vladimir Palicka
  • Svatopluk Byma
  • Sarka Blazkova
  • Jan Stepan
  • Tereza Hendrychova
  • Jiri Vlcek
  • Petr Pavek
Research Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in management of patients at risk of osteoporosis (OP). The objectives were to assess (1) knowledge about OP and use of OP clinical guideline in comparison with other information sources and (2) association between the use of individual information sources and knowledge and self-reported quality of care among GPs.

Methods

Survey among random sample of Czech GPs was performed to find out their attitudes and role in OP management. The return rate of the postal questionnaire was 38% (525 respondents). Quality of care was assessed using three indicators: suspicion on OP, referral to the specialist and initial check-up.

Results

Respondents (median age 52 years, 59% women) had a very good knowledge of several risk factors, while others, namely low body mass index, history of hip fracture in mother and smoking were perceived as risk factors by only 40%, 45% and 55% of respondents, respectively. 10% of GPs stated the correct answer regarding daily calcium intake recommended for postmenopausal women. The OP guideline was considered accessible by 83% of respondents and used repeatedly by 54%. Use of the guideline correlated positively with knowledge score (P < 0.001), while use of each individual other source of information did not. Use of the guideline correlated with all three indicators of quality of care. Use of each other information source correlated only with a maximum of two indicators.

Conclusion

We identified areas of insufficient knowledge that should be targeted in educational activities for GPs. It is recommended to further motivate GPs to use their clinical guidelines regularly.

Keywords

Information sources General practitioners Clinical guideline Knowledge Osteoporosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Kanis, J.A., McCloskey, E.V., Johansson, H., Cooper, C., Rizzoli, R. & Reginster, J.Y. (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Intenational, 24(1), 23–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Stepan, J.J., Vaculik, J., Pavelka, K., Zofka, J., Johansson, H. & Kanis, J.A. (2012) Hip fracture incidence from 1981 to 2009 in the Czech Republic as a basis of the country-specific FRAX model. Calcifies Tissue International, 90, 365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Skála-Rosenbaum, J., Bartoníček, J., Říha, D., Waldauf, P. & Džupa, V. (2011) Single-centre study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997–2007. International Orthopaedics, 35, 587–593PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hernlund, E., Svedbom, A., Ivergård, M., Compston, J., Cooper, C., Stenmark, J., McCloskey, E.V., Jönsson, B. & Kanis, J.A. (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: Medical Management, Epidemiology and Economic Burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Archives of Osteoporosis, in pressGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Chen, J.S., Hogan, C., Lyubomirsky, G. & Sambrook, P.N. (2009) Management of osteoporosis in primary care in Australia. Osteoporosis International, 20(3), 491–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Harrington, J.T. (2011) A decade of system- and population-based osteoporosis care improvement. Osteoporosis Intenational, 2011, 22(Suppl 3), 483–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Vytřísalová, M., Blažková, Š., Palička, V. & Štěpán, J. (2009) Analýza preskripce antiosteoporotik muŽským pacientům v letech 2002–2006. In Abstrakta — 12. Kongres českých a slovenských osteologů. Osteologický Bulletin, 14, 139Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Laliberté, M.-C., Perreault, S., Jouini, G., Shea, B.J. & Lalonde, L. (2011) Effectiveness of intervention to improve the detection and treatment of osteoporosis in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International, 22, 2743–2768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lugtenberg, M., Burgers, J.S. & Westert, G.P. (2009) Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 18, 385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Blazkova, S., Vytrisalova, M., Palicka, V., Stepan, J., Byma, S., Kubena, A.A., Hala, T. & Vlcek, J. (2010) Osteoporosis risk assessment and management in primary care: focus on quantity and quality. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 1176–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Chenot, R., Scheidt-Nave, C., Gabler, S., Kochen, M.M. & Himmel, W. (2007) German primary care doctors’ awareness of osteoporosis and knowledge of national guidelines. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes, 115, 584–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Duyvendak, M., Naunton, M., van Roon, E.N. & Brouwers, J.R.B.J. (2011) Doctors’ beliefs and knowledge on corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: identifying barriers to improve prevention. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 36(3), 356–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Werner, P. (2005) Knowledge about osteoporosis: assessment, correlates and outcomes. Osteoporosis International, 16(2), 115–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Pérez-Edo, L., Ciria Recasens, M., Castelo-Branco, C., Orozco López, P., Gimeno Marquéz, A., Pérez, C. & Manasanch Dalmau, J. (2004) Management of osteoporosis in general practice: a cross-sectional survey of primary care practitioners in Spain. Osteoporosis International, 5, 252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Dahan, R., Reis, S., Borkan, J., Brown, J.-B., Hermoni, D., Mansor, N., Harris, S. (2008) Is knowledge a barrier to implementing low back pain guidelines? Assessing the knowledge of Israeli family doctors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14, 785–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Heidrich, J., Behrens, T., Raspe, F. & Keil, U. (2005) Knowledge and perception of guidelines and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease among general practitioners and internists. Results from a physician survey in Germany. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 12(6), 521–529Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Rätsep, A., Kalda, R., Oja, I. & Lember, M. (2006) Family doctors’ knowledge and self-reported care of type 2 diabetes patients in comparison to the clinical practice guideline: cross-sectional study. BMC Family Practice, 7, 36PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Linder, J.A., Schnipper, J.L., Tsurikova, R., Volk, L.A. & Middleton, B. (2010) Self-reported familiarity with acute respiratory infection guidelines and antibiotic prescribing in primary care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 22, 469–475PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Karbach, U., Schubert, I., Hagemeister, J., Ernstmann, N., Pfaff, H., Höpp, H.-W. (2011) Physicians’ knowledge of and compliance with guidelines: an exploratory study in cardiovascular diseases. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 108, 61–69PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magda Vytrisalova
    • 1
  • Leos Fuksa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vladimir Palicka
    • 2
  • Svatopluk Byma
    • 3
  • Sarka Blazkova
    • 1
  • Jan Stepan
    • 4
  • Tereza Hendrychova
    • 1
  • Jiri Vlcek
    • 1
  • Petr Pavek
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of PharmacyCharles University in PragueHradec KraloveCzech Republic
  2. 2.Osteocentre and Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and DiagnosticsFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in PragueHradec KraloveCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec KraloveCharles University in PragueHradec KraloveCzech Republic
  4. 4.Institute of Rheumatology, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  5. 5.Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of PharmacyCharles University in PragueHradec KraloveCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations