Advertisement

Central European Journal of Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 601–608 | Cite as

Association of the thickness of carotid intima-media complex and ancle brachial index with coronary disease severity

  • Svetlana Kostić
  • Ivan Tasić
  • Dragan Mijalković
  • Dragan Lović
  • Dragan Djordjević
  • Todorka Savić
  • Nataša Miladinović Tasić
  • Aleksandra Aranđelović
Research Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Abstract

Our aim was to establish the association of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and ankle-brachial index(ABI) with the severity of coronary artery dissease (CAD). The study enrolled 150 examinees and divided them into two groups. The patients with stenotic changes in the coronary artery, constituted the first group (CP)(n=100); the second group consisted of the examinees without CAD — control goup (CG) (n=50). The following methods were used in the study: Color Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries, ABI, calculation of SCORE risk and coronary angiography.

Results

The number of coronary blood vessels affected by atherosclerosis was significantly higher with the increase of CIMT, CV risk score, and waist-hip ratio by one measurement unit: CIMT by 0.729; p<0.05; CV risk score by 0.033; p<0.05; and waist-hip ratio by 3.182; p<0.01. With each increase of ABI value by one measurement unit, the number of involved blood vessels dropped by 0.844; p<0.05.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that reduced ABI value, increased CIMT and number of plaques in the carotid arteries were in correlation with the severity of coronary artery disease.

Keywords

Carotid intima-media thickness Ankle-brachial index Coronary artery disease SCORE risk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    011ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57(8): 1002–1044Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, Rosvall M, Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2007; 115(4): 459–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: e1–e192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Fowkes FGR, Murray GD, Butcher I, Heald CL, Lee RJ, Chambless LE, et al. Ankle Brachial Index Combined With Framingham Risk Score to Predict Cardiovascular Events and Mortality. A Meta analysis. JAMA 2008; 300(2): 197–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA, Burrows MT, Kahl FR, et al. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary diemeter? Circulation 1988; 78: 1157–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. Journal of Hypertension 2009; 27(11): 2121–2158Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: e50–e103Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (Updating the 2005 Guideline). A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2011; 124(18): 2020–2045Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Olin JW, Allie DE, Belkin M, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr, Creager MA, et al. ACCF/AHA/ACR/SCAI/SIR/SVM/SVN/SVS 2010 Performance Measures for Adults With Peripheral Artery Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures, the American College of Radiology, the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, the Society for Interventional Radiology, the Society for Vascular Medicine, the Society for Vascular Nursing, and the Society for Vascular Surgery (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Performance Measures for Peripheral Artery Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 2147–2181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink ML, Baumgartner I, Clément D, Collet JP, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases. Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32(22): 2851–2906Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Papamichael CM, Lekakis JP, Stamatelopoulos KS, Papaioannou TG, Alevizaki MK, Cimponeriu AT, et al. Ankle-Brachial Index as a Predictor of the Extent of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 615–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Nunez D, Morillas P, Quiles J, Cordero A, Guindo J, Soria F, et al. a on behalf of the PAMISCA study researchers. Usefulness of an Abnormal Ankle-Brachial Index for Detecting Multivessel Coronary Disease in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol 2010; 63(1): 54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bertomeu V, Morillas P, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Quiles J, Guindo J, Soria F, et al. Prevalence and prognostic influence of peripheral arterial disease in patients >or=40 years old admitted into hospital following an acute coronary event. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36:189–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Criqui MH, Ninomiya JK, Wingard DL, Ji M, Fronek A. Progression of peripheral arterial disease predicts cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52(21): 1736–1174PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Mannami T, Baba S, Ogata J. Strong and significant relationships between aggregation of major coronary risk factors and the acceleration of carotid atherosclerosis in the general population of a Japanese city. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2297–2303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Nguyen-Thanh HT, Benzaquen BS. Screening for subclinical coronary artery disease measuring carotid intima media thickness. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 104(10): 1383–1388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Nambi V, Chambless L, Folsom AR, He M, Hu Y, Mosley T, et al. Carotid intimamedia thickness and the presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 1600–1607PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Ray A, Tamsma JT, Hovens MM, op’ t Roodt J, Huisman MV. Accuracy of carotid plaque detection and intima-media thickness measurement with ultrasonography in routine clinical practice. Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Feb; 21(1): 35–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Khoury Z, Schwartz R, Gottlieb S, Chenzbraun A, Stern S and Keren A. Relation of Coronary Artery Disease to Atherosclerotic Disease in the Aorta, Carotid, and Femoral Arteries Evaluated by Ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1429–1433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svetlana Kostić
    • 1
  • Ivan Tasić
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dragan Mijalković
    • 1
  • Dragan Lović
    • 3
  • Dragan Djordjević
    • 1
    • 2
  • Todorka Savić
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nataša Miladinović Tasić
    • 2
  • Aleksandra Aranđelović
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Treatment and RehabilitationNiška BanjaSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of NišNišSerbia
  3. 3.Clinic for internal disease InterMedicaNišSerbia
  4. 4.Institute for Cardiovascular Disease, Clinical Center of Serbia, SerbiaUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of MedicineBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations