Central European Journal of Medicine

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 258–261 | Cite as

Neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio as a biomarker of bacterial infections

  • Michal Holub
  • Ondřej Beran
  • Nikola Kaspříková
  • Pavel Chalupa
Research Article

Abstract

The implementation of new markers of bacterial infection into clinical practice is hindered by their costs. We assessed the potential use of the neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) to discriminate between bacterial and viral infections. NLCR was evaluated in 45 patients with bacterial infections: 24 patients with viral infections and 18 healthy adults. The medians of NLCR were 11.73 in bacterial infections, 2.86 in viral infections and 1.86 in controls. The NLCR cut-off value of 6.2 exhibited a sensitivity value of 0.91 and a specificity value of 0.96 for bacterial infection. These results suggest a diagnostic potential for NLCR.

Keywords

Bacterial infection Viral infection Laboratory diagnosis Marker Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Adams NG. Diagnostic use of C-reactive protein in bacteraemic emergency department patients. Emerg Med Australan 2005; 17: 371–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ho KM, Lipman J. An update on C-reactive protein for intensivists. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 234–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Assicot M, Gendrel D, Carsin H, Raymond J, Guilbaud J, Bohuon C. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet 1993; 34: 515–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Russell JA. Management of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1699–1713. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Chalupa P, Beran O, Herwald H, Kaspříková N, Holub M. Evaluation of potential biomarkers for the discrimination of bacterial and viral infections. Infection 2011; 39: 411–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Zahorec R. Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts — rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill [Article in English and Slovak]. Bratisl Med J 2001; 102: 5–14Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    de Jager CP, van Wijk PT, Mathoera RB, de Jongh-Leuvenink J, van der Poll T, Wever PC. Lymphocytopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio predict bacteremia better than conventional infection markers in an emergency care unit. Crit Care 2010; 14: R192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Mills GD, Lala HM, Oehley MR, Craig AB, Barratt K, Hood D, Thornley CN, Nesdale A, Manikkam NE, Reeve P. Elevated procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker in meningococcal disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006; 25: 501–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Nijsten MW, Olinga P, The TH, de Vries EG, Koops HS, Groothuis GM, Limburg PC, ten Duis HJ, Moshage H, Hoekstra HJ, Bijzet J, Zwaveling JH. Procalcitonin behaves as a fast responding acute phase protein in vivo and in vitro. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 458–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shehabi Y, Seppelt I. Pro/Con debate: is procalcitonin useful for guiding antibiotic decision making in critically ill patients? Crit Care 2008; 12: 211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wyllie DH, Bowler IC, Peto TE. Relation between lymphopenia and bacteraemia in UK adults with medical emergencies. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57: 950–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Holub M, Kluckova Z, Beneda B, Hobstova J, Huzicka I, Prazak J, Lobovska A. Changes in lymphocyte subpopulations and CD3+/DR+ expression in sepsis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2000; 6: 657–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Gorbach SL. Neutropenic enterocolitis. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27: 700–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Batlle M, Vall-Llovera F, Bechini J, Camps I, Marcos P, Vives S, Oriol A, Ribera JM. Neutropenic enterocolitis in adult patients with acute leukemia or stem cell transplant recipients: study of 7 cases [Article in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc) 2007; 129: 660–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Maartens G, Willcox PA, Benatar SR. Miliary tuberculosis: rapid diagnosis, hematologic abnormalities, and outcome in 109 treated adults. Am J Med 1990; 89: 291–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Okada H, Kobune F, Sato TA, Kohama T, Takeuchi Y, Abe T, Takayama N, Tsuchiya T, Tashiro M. Extensive lymphopenia due to apoptosis of uninfected lymphocytes in acute measles patients. Arch Virol 2000; 145: 905–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ramaekers LH, Theunissen PM, Went K. Acute lymphopenia, stress, and plasma cortisol. Arch Dis Child 1975; 50: 555–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Ohsawa M, Nakamura M, Pan LH, Shizuka T, Nakagawa J, Ishida H, Ouchi M, Shiroto T, Hotta K, Sawai T, Hiramori K. Post-operative constrictive pericarditis complicated with lymphocytopenia and hypoglobulinemia. Intern Med 2004; 43: 811–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Cardeñosa N, Romero M, Quesada M, Oviedo M, Carmona G, Codina G, Jansà JM, Domínguez A. Is the vaccination coverage established enough to control pertussis, or it is a re-emerging disease? Vaccine 2009; 27: 3489–3491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michal Holub
    • 1
  • Ondřej Beran
    • 1
  • Nikola Kaspříková
    • 2
  • Pavel Chalupa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University in Prague and University Hospital BulovkaPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations