Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Current approach to episiotomy: Inevitable or unnecessary?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Medicine

Abstract

An episiotomy is a surgical incision through the perineum made to provide sufficient area for the delivery of the infant. About 10 to 95% of women who deliver will have episiotomy depending on which part of the world they are having delivery.

Too early episiotomy causes extensive bleeding and too late episiotomy causes the excessive stretching of a pelvic floor and lacerations could not be prevented.

According to widely accepted arguments, there are many benefits of episiotomy for the neonate: prevention of injuries, shoulder dystocia and mental retardation of the infant. Benefits for the mother are: reduction of severe lacerations, prevention of sexual dysfunction, prevention of urinary and fecal incontinence. But those things could also be complications of episiotomy, if it is being used nonrestrictively. Some other complications are also extensive bleeding, hematoma or infection.

There are many different opinions in literature about using episiotomy restrictively or routinely, so it is the right doubt arisen: is it inevitable or unnecessary?

There is a wide variation in episiotomy practice, and the decision of performing it or not depends of actual clinical situation.

There is still a great need for continuous obstetrics education according to the evidence based guidelines for the patient’s safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jevremovic M, Terzic M. Contemporary menagement of delivery. In: Bojovic S. (Editor): Human reproduction. Scientific book, Belgrade, 2003, pp. 912–927

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen RE, Hanson RW Jr. Episiotomy in low-risk vaginal deliveries. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Episiotomy. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:957–962

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gabbe SG, DeLee JB. The prophylactic forceps operation.1920. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:254–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Woolley RJ. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995;50:806–820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lappen R. J, Gossett R. Changes in episiotomy practice: evidence-based medicine in action. Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol. 2010;5: 301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shiono P, Klebanoff MA, Carey JC. Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:765–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Labrecque M, Bailargeon L, Daillaire M, Trembley A, Pinault JJ, Gingras S. Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparaous women. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 156: 797–802

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritel X, Schaal JP, Fauconnier A, Bertrand V, Levet C, Pigné A. Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115:247–252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J, Lohr N.K Outcomes of Routine Episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:2141–2148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramin SM, Gilstrap LC III. Episiotomy and early repair of dehiscence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994;37:816–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jovanovic N, Terzic M, Dotlic J, Aleksic S. Prevention of Postpartal Endometritis: Antibiotic of Choice. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2009; 137:506–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zizic V, Plecas D, Velimirovic M, Terzic M. The most frequent bacteriologic causes of puerperal infection. Giorn Mal Inf Parass 1990; 42:563–564

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ugwumadu A, Manyonda I, Reid F, Hay P. Effect of early oral clindamycin on late miscarriage and preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with abnormal vaginal flora and bacterial vaginosis: a andomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2003; 361: 983–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rorbye C, Petersen IS, Nilas L. Postpartum Clostridium sordellii infection associated with fatal toxic shock syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:1134–1135

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris WE, Fernández-Miyakawa ME. Toxins of Clostridium perfringens. Rev Argent Microbiol 2009; 41:251–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Langer B, Minetti A. Immediate and long term complications of episiotomy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2006; 35:1S59–1S67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dinulović D, Terzić M. Injuries of the birth canal during childbirth. In: Dinulović D. (Editor). Obstetrics. Službeni glasnik SRJ, Belgrade, 1996, pp. 436–446

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:1:CD000081

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldman JC, Robinson J.N.The role of episiotomy in current obstetric practice. Semin Perinatol. 2003; 27: 3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frudinger A, Bartram CI, Spencer JAD, Kamm MA. Perineal examination as a predictor of underlying external anal sphincter damage. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 104:1009–1013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alperin M, Krohn MA, Parviainen K. Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1274–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL, Kominiarek MA, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Ramirez M et al. Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:627–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:464–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H. Obstetric risk factors for stress urinary incontinence: A population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96; 440-445

    Google Scholar 

  26. Casey BM, Schaffer JI, Bloom SL, Heartwell SF, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Obstetric antecedents for postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1655–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Viswanathan M, Hartmann K, Palmieri R, Lux L, Swinson T, Lohr KN et al. The Use of Episiotomy in Obstetrical Care: A Systematic Review. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2005; 112:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rockner G. Urinary incontinence after perineal trauma at childbirth. Scand J Caring Sci 1990;4:169–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Arrue M, Ibanez L, Paredes J, Murgiondo A., Belar M, Sarasqueta C et al. Stress urinary incontinence six months after first vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 210–214

  30. Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, Pregazzi R, Grimaldi E, Guaschino S. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:669–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth 2006; 33:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wheeler T, Richter HE. Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19:474–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT. Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study.BMJ 2000;320:86–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pirro N, Sastre B, Sielezneff I. What are the risk factors of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? J Chir 2007;144:197–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Terzic M. Internal genital organs. In: Milisavljevic M. (Editor): Clinical anatomy. Science, Belgrade, 1996, pp. 436–446

    Google Scholar 

  36. Buhling KJ, Schmidt S, Robinson JN, Klapp C, Siebert G, Dudenhausen JW.Rate of dyspareunia after delivery in primiparae according to mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;124:42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sayasneh A, Pandeva I. Postpartum sexual disfunction. A literature review of risk factors and role of mode of delivery. BJMP 2010; 3:316–320

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ejegard H, Ryding EL, Sjogren B. Sexuality after delivery with episiotomy: A long-term follow-up. Gynecol Obstet Investig 2008; 66:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  39. Danielsson I, Sjoberg I, Stenlund H, Wikman M. Prevalence and incidence of prolonged and severe dyspareunia in women: results from a population study. Scand J Public Health 2003;31:113–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Joshi A, Acharya R. Perineal outcome after restrictive use of episiotomy in primi-gravidas. J Nepal Med Assoc 2009;48:269–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fritel X. Pelvic floor and pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2010; 38:332–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Adamo V, Di Natale W, Meola C, Gilio M, Cavalli S, Ferrari L et al. Endometriosis in episiotomy scar: a case report. 2004;56:735–738

    Google Scholar 

  43. Baloglu A, Uysal D, Aslan N, Yigit S. Advanced stage of cervical carcinoma undiagnosed during antenatal period in term pregnancy and concomitant metastasis on episiotomy scar during delivery: a case report and review of the literature. Int JGynecol Cancer. 2007;17:1155–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Center of Serbia, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr Koste Todorovića 26, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia

    Nebojsa S. Jovanovic, Dusica M. Kocijancic & Milan M. Terzic

  2. School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotića 8, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia

    Milan M. Terzic

Authors
  1. Nebojsa S. Jovanovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dusica M. Kocijancic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Milan M. Terzic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nebojsa S. Jovanovic.

About this article

Cite this article

Jovanovic, N.S., Kocijancic, D.M. & Terzic, M.M. Current approach to episiotomy: Inevitable or unnecessary?. cent.eur.j.med 6, 685–690 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-011-0088-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-011-0088-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation