Retroperitoneal hematoma — a rare complication after cervical conization because of cervicoisthmic arteriovenous malformation: a case report

  • Dubravko Habek
  • Tatjana Pavelić Turudić
Case Report


A rare case is presented concerning retroperitoneal hemorrhage in a 28-year-old patient after a cold knife conization and cervical suture reconstruction. Arteriovenous cervicoisthmic malformation is a risk factor that was identified in a hysterectomy sample.


Retroperitoneal hematoma Cervical neoplasia Cervical conization Cervicoisthmic arteriovenous malformation 


  1. [1]
    Brown CF, Mashini IS, Turner WA, Gallup DG. Retroperitoneal hematoma: an unusual complication of cold knife conization of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:66S–67S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ohel G. Complications of cone biopsy of the cervix. S Afr Med J 1981; 59:382–383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Yang JJ, Xiang Y, Wan XR, Yang XY. Diagnosis and management of uterine arteriovenous fistulas with massive vaginal bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 89:114–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Arora R, Achla B, Pinkee S, Purba G, Bharti M. Arteriovenous malformations of the uterus. N Z Med J 2004; 11:U1182.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kolben M, Rotter M. Vascular malformations of the uterus. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1991; 51:401–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Raynal P, Lucas J. Pelviperitonitis and intestinal occlusion: two unusual cold-knife conisation complications. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2003; 32:43–45.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Steinfeld HJ, Haddock JB. Case report: peritonitis complicating cone biopsy of the cervix. Md Med J 1995; 44:528–529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Treszezamsky AD, Molina Boero MF, Mehta I. Cervical conization complicated by sepsis with lung and liver abscesses. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2010; 14:130–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cura M, Martinez N, Cura A, Dalsaso TJ, Elmerhi F. Arteriovenous malformations of the uterus. Acta Radiol 2009; 50:823–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Dar P, Karmin I, Einstein MH. Arteriovenous malformations of the uterus: long-term follow-up. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008; 66:157–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    O’Brien P, Neyastani A, Buckley AR, Chang SD, Legiehn GM. Uterine arteriovenous malformations: from diagnosis to treatment. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25:1387–1392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kelly SM, Belli AM, Campbell S. Arteriovenous malformation of the uterus associated with secondary postpartum hemorrhage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21:602–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Larsson G, Gullberg B, Grundsell H. A comparison of complications of laser and cold knife conization. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62:213–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kazandi M, Oztekin K, Kazandi AC, Zekioglu O. Evaluation of LOOP electrosurgical excisional procedure: case series. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2010; 30:562–563.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Rimailho J, Puyuelo L, Escourrou G, Hoff J. Value of cold-knife conization without hemostatic sutures. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod Paris 1994;23:145–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics University Hospital “Sveti Duh”ZagrebYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations