Central European Journal of Medicine

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 464–469 | Cite as

The efficiency of immunoenzyme assay in the diagnosis of lambliosis

  • Natasa L. Miladinovic Tasic
  • Suzana A. Tasic
  • Ivan S. Tasic
Research Article


The aim of this study is to determine the difference in efficiency of direct immunoenzyme-linked assay (EIA) and conventional microscopy (CM) plus conventional concentration technique (CCT) using comparative analysis in the diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic lambliosis when only one stool sample is to be tested. The study enrolled 577 examinees: 208 patients and 369 asymptomatic examinees. Lambliosis was diagnosed using CM plus CCT (three stool samples) and direct EIA (the first sample). All statistical parameters of the EIA method were 100% in the patients with symptoms of infection. In addition to that, in the group of asymptomatic carriers of Giardia lamblia (G. lamblia) some very high values of these parameters were recorded too, with sensitivity and negative predictive value being both at 100%. In contrast to the EIA method, CM plus CCT of the first stool sample demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (66.67%) compared to the reference standard. The study did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences in diagnostic efficiancy between the EIA testing of one stool sample and CM plus CCT (p<0.05). However, the observed difference in diagnostic efficiency between the methods was very close to the cut-off value for statistical significance (p=0.06).


Conventional microscopy Immunoenzyme-linked assay Lambliosis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Hill D.R., Giardiasis: Issues in management and treatment, Infect. Dis. Clin. North. Am., 1993, 7, 503–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ortega R.Y., and Adam R.D., Giardia:overveiw and update, Clin. Infect. Dis., 1997, 25, 545–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Rockwell L.R., Giardia lamblia and Giardiasis with Particular Attention to the Sierra Nevada, Sierra Nature Notes May, 2002, 2, 2Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Jiménez-Cardoso E., Giardia lamblia, In: Fuchs J., Pooda M. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, Taylor&Francis group, LLC 2004Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Farthing M.J.G., Giardia comes of age: progress in epidemiology, immunology and chemotherapy, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 1992, 30, 563–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lengerich E.J., Addiss D.G., and Juranek D.D., Severe Giardiasis in the United States Clin. Infect. Dis., 1994, 18, 760–763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Furness W.B., Beach M.J., and Roberts J.M., Giardiasis surveillance-United States 1992–1997, Morb. Mortal. Wkly.Rep., 2000, 49, 1–13Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Pickering L.K., Woodward W.E., DuPont H.L., and Sullivan P., Occurrence of Giardia lamblia in children in day care centers, J. Pediatr., 1984, 104, 522–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Farthing M.J.G., Giardiasis, Gastroenterol. Clin. North. Am., 1996, 25, 493–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Garcia L. S., Diagnostic medical parasitology, 5th ed., ASM press, Washington, D.C., 2007Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Oberhuber G., Kastner N., and Stolte M., Giardiasis: a histologic analysis of 567 cases, Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 32, 48–51Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Isaac-Renton J.L., Shahriari H., and Bowie W.R., Comparison of an in vitro method and an in vivo method of Giardia excystation, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1992, 58, 1530–1533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Korman S.H., Hais E., and Spira D.T., Routine in vitro cultivation of Giardia lamblia by using the string test, J. Clin. Microbiol., 1990, 28, 368–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Aldeen W.E., Carroll K., Robison A., Morrison M., Hale D., Comparison of nine commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of Giardia lamblia in fecal specimens, J. Clin. Microbiol., 1998, 36, 1338–1340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Aldeen W.E., Hale D., Robinson A.J., Carroll K., Evaluation of a commercially available ELISA assay for detection of Giardia lamblia in fecal specimens, Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 1995, 21, 77–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Garcia L.S., and Shimizu R.Y., Evaluation of nine immunoassay kits (enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescence) for detection of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum in human fecal specimens, J. Clin. Microbiol., 1997, 35, 1526–1529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Garcia L.S., and Garsia P.J., Detection of Giardia lamblia in Human Fecal Specimens by Solid-Phase Qualitative Immunochromatographic Assay, J. Clin. Microbiol., 2006, 44, 4587–4588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mank T.G., Zaat J.O., Deelder A.M., van Eijk J.T., and Polderman A.M., Sensitivity of microscopy versus enzyme immunoassay in the laboratory diagnosis of Giardiasis, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 1997, 16, 615–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Rosoff J.D., Sanders C.A., Seema S.S., DeLay P.R., Hadley W.K., Vincenzi F.F., Yajko D.M., and O’Hanley P.D., Stool diagnosis of Giardiasis using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay to detect Giardia-specific antigen 65(GSA 65), J. Clin. Microbiol., 1989, 27, 1997–2002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hanson L.K., and Cartwright P.C., Use of an Enzyme Immonoassay Does Not Eliminate the Need To Analyze Multiple Stool Specimens for Senzitive Detection of Giardia lamblia, J. Clin. Microbiol., 2001, 39, 474–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Maraha B., Buiting A.G.M., Evaluation of Four Enzyme Immunoassays for the Detection of Giardia lamblia Antigen in Stool Specimens, Eur. J. Microbil. Infect. Dis. 2000, 19, 485–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Schunk M., Jelinek T., Wetzel K., Nothdurft H.D., Detection of Giardia lamblia and Entamoeba histolytica in Stool Samples by Two Enzyme Immunoassays, Eur. J. Microbil. Infect. Dis., 2001, 20, 389–391Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Ali S.A., and Hill D.R., Giardia intestinalis, Current Opionin in Infections Diseases, 2003, 16, 453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Johnston S.P., Ballard M.M., Beach M.J., Causer L., Wilkins P.P., Evaluation of Three Comercial Assays for Detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium Organisms in Fecal Specimens, J. Clin. Microbiol., 2003, 41, 623–626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Stark D., van Hal S., Marrriott D., Ellis J., Harkness J., Irritable bowel syndrome: a review on the role of intestinal protozoa and the importance of their detection and diagnosis, Int J Parasitol., 2007, 37, 11–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Cohen J., A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Education and Psychological Measurement., 1960, 20, 37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Daciger M., and Lopez M., Number of Giardia in the feces of infected children, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 1975, 24, 237–242Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natasa L. Miladinovic Tasic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Suzana A. Tasic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ivan S. Tasic
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of NisNisSerbia
  2. 2.Department of Parasitology and MicologyPublic Health Center-NisNisSerbia
  3. 3.Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of NisNisSerbia

Personalised recommendations