How safe is the use of prosthetic materials in the repair of abdominal-wall defects in malnourished subjects?
Incisional hernias and abdominal-wall defects consume large amounts of healthcare resources. Use of mesh is effective in treatment of these disorders and can decrease the rate of recurrence. This experimental study focused on the safety of mesh use in the setting of malnutrition, a condition that impairs wound healing. Rats were divided into two groups: normally fed and food-restricted. An abdominal-wall defect, 2 by 2 cm, was covered with polypropylene mesh, 2.5 by 2.5 cm. After sacrifice of the rats at the 21st and 60th days, tissue samples were sent for tensiometric and histopathological studies. No significant difference in infectious complications was observed between the two groups. Tensiometry revealed no significant differences between the groups. On histopathological examination, the only difference noted was in the vascularization scores of normally fed rats. For malnourished subjects that survived after surgery, the use of polypropylene mesh appeared safe in the closure of abdominal-wall defects, with no increase in infection rate and satisfactory wound healing.
KeywordsHernia repair Mesh Wound healing Tensile strength Malnutrition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hill G.L., Understanding protein energy malnutrition, In: G.L. Hill (Ed.), Disorders of Nutrition and Metabolism in Clinical Surgery: Understanding and Management, Churchill Livingstone, London, 1992Google Scholar
- Koback M.W., Benditt E.P., Wissler R.W., The healing of protein deficiency to experimental wound healing, Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 1947, 85, 751–758Google Scholar
- Leong M., Phillips L.G., Wound healing, In: Townsend C.M., Beauchamp R.D., Evers B.M., Mattox K.L. (Eds), The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice, Elsevier&Saunders, Philadelphia, 2004Google Scholar