Advertisement

Central European Journal of Medicine

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 438–445 | Cite as

Optimizing the degree of distension and reducing discomfort in CT colonography by means of a microprocessor interface system for air insufflation

  • Nikolay V. Sirakov
  • Athanas D. Kristev
  • Plamen I. Zagorchev
  • Russin R. Nikolov
  • Vladimir N. Sirakov
  • Kichka G. Velkova
Research Article
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

The patients’ discomfort during CT colonography determines which method is used and its frequency of use. The discomfort is largely associated with the colon’s insufflation with gas. A system for an automatic room-air insufflation has been developed that ensures a continuous and steady air insufflation and an increase in colonic pressure and enables a relatively fast decompression. This system provides constant pressure monitoring and can alert the operator, if necessary. The degree of discomfort was evaluated for 36 patients, who were subjected to manual and automated air insufflation. The degree of the colonic distension achieved by the two methods was compared. The data analysis showed a significantly lower level of discomfort in patients with automated air insufflation. The degree of colonic distension was evaluated by comparing the diameters of similar segments of the colon, as well as by the subjective opinion of the operator. The distension with automated air insufflation was higher than that with manual air insufflation. In some cases there was a significant difference (P<0,05). In conclusion, the results show that the automatic insufflation of air at room temperature can be used to optimize CT colonography.

Keywords

CT colonography Automatic air insufflation Discomfort Distension 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Bruzzi J.F., Moss A.C., Brennan D.D., MacMathuna P., Fenlon HM., Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography, Eur. Radiol. 2003, 13, 2264–2270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Laghi A., Virtual colonoscopy: clinical application, Eur. Radiol., 2005, 15, D138–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bretthauer M., Hoff G., Thiis-Evensen E., Grotmol T., Holmsen S.T., Moritz V., et al., Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces discomfort due to flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 2002, 37, 1103–1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Burling D., Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Gartner L., Paliwalla M., Peiris C., et al., Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR, 2006, 186, 96–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Goh V., Morley S., Bassett P., Atkin W., et al., Optimizing colonic distension for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter, Radiology, 2003, 229, 99–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Shinners T.J., Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J., Jones D.A., Olsen C.H., Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography, AJR, 2006, 186, 1491–1496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bretthauer M., Hoff G.S., Thiis-Evensen E., Huppertz-Hauss G., Skovlund E., Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003, 58, 203–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Church J., Delaney C., Randomized controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis. Colon. Rectum., 2003, 46, 322–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Park S.H., Yee J., Kim S.H., Kim Y.H., Fundamental elements for successful performance of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy), Korean J. Radiol., 2007, 8, 264–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Svensson M.H., Svensson E., Hellstrom M., Bowel wall visualisation at CT colonography, Acta Radiol., 2002, 43, 87–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Goei R., Nix M., Kessels A.H., Ten Tusscher M.P., Use of antispasmodic drugs in double contrast barium enema examination: glucagon or buscopan?, Clin. Radiol., 1995, 50, 553–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Morrin M.M., Farrell R.J., Keogan M.T., Kruskal J.B., Yam C.S., Raptopoulos V. CT colonography: colonic distension improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur. Radiol. 2002, 12, 525–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Yee J., CT colonography: examination prerequisites, Abdom. Imaging 2002, 27, 244–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Albinsson S, Nordström I, Hellstrand P., Stretch of the vascular wall induces smooth muscle differentiation by promoting actin polymerization, J Biol. Chem., 2004, 13, 279, 34849–34855Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Hamill O.P., Twenty odd years of stretch-sensitive channels. Pflugers. Arch. 2006, 453, 333–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Bartram C., CT colonography: methods, pathology and pitfalls, Clin. Radiol., 2003, 58, 179–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Rogalla P., Schmidt E., Korves M., Hamm BD,. Optimal colon distension for virtual colonoscopy: room air versus CO2 insufflation, Radiology, 1999, (Suppl 213), 76Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Dachman AH. Advice for optimizing colonic distension and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography, Radiology. 2006, 239, 317–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Van Hee R., An abdominal challenge: the compartment syndrome, G Chir 2007, 28, 413–418PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolay V. Sirakov
    • 1
  • Athanas D. Kristev
    • 2
  • Plamen I. Zagorchev
    • 2
  • Russin R. Nikolov
    • 2
  • Vladimir N. Sirakov
    • 1
  • Kichka G. Velkova
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Image Diagnostics, Radiology and Nuclear MedicineMedical UniversityPlovdivBulgaria
  2. 2.Department of BiophysicsMedical UniversityPlovdivBulgaria

Personalised recommendations