Central European Journal of Medicine

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 207–213 | Cite as

Primary total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: Medium-term functional and radiographic outcomes

  • Valér Džupa
  • Pavel Pazdírek
  • Vladimír Pacovský
  • Jan Bartoníček
  • Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum
Research Article
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

The number of complications after primary total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck is higher than that after operations for osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the number of complications and mid-term functional and radiological findings of patients after primary THA for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck. Between 1995 and 1998, we operated on a total of 89 patients for acute displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck, i.e. Garden Type 3 and 4. In all the patients we evaluated intraoperative and early postoperative complications. We reviewed clinical and radiological results in 65 patients. The only intraoperative complication was abruption of the greater trochanter. Early postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients (15%). The specific complications, THA dislocation, occurred in 3 patients. Non-specific complications were recorded in 10 patients. No delayed healing of the surgical wound, neural lesion or early, delayed or late infection was recorded. Of 65 patients followed-up for an average of 78 months (range, 62–109 months), 8 patients underwent revision surgery. Of 57 patients with primary THA, very good and good clinical results according to the Harris Hip Score were recorded in 48 patients (84%) and poor results in only 2 patients (4%). Nine of 57 followed-up patients showed radiological signs of loosening (16%). The radiolucent line could be seen in 3 patients in the region of the cup, in 1 patient in the region of the femoral component and in 5 patients in both components. Clinical complaints that would result in indication for reimplantation were recorded in none of the mentioned patients. Number of complications, functional results and resumption of full self-reliance by patients after THA for an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck are so positive that we consider the indication of THA for a displaced femoral neck fracture fully justified.

Keywords

Displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck Primary total hip arthroplasty Mid-term functional and radiographic results 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Bhandari M., Devereaux P.J., Swiontkowski M.F., Tornetta P., Obremskey W., Koval K.J., et al., Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 2003, 85-A, 1673–1681Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bhandari M., Devereaux P.J., Tornetta P., Swiontkowski M.F., Berry D.J., Haidukewych G., et al., Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 2005, 87-A, 2122–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bonnaire F., Lein T., Hohaus T., Weber A., Protetische Versorgung der proximalen Femurfrakturen, Unfallchirurg, 2005, 108, 387–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Coates R.L., Armour P., Treatment of subcapital femoral fractures by primary total hip replacement, Injury, 1979, 11, 132–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Koval K.J., Zuckerman J.D., Hip fractures: I. Overview and evaluation and treatment of femoralneck fractures, J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., 1994, 2, 141–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Schleicher I., Kordelle J., Jürgensen I., Haas H., Melzer C., Die Schenkelhalsfrakturen beim alten Menschen — Bipolare Hemiendoprothese vs. Totalendoprothse, Unfallchirurg, 2003, 106, 467–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sharma S., Draviraj K.P., Bhamra M.S., Primary total hip replacement for acute displaced subcapital femoral fractures with a minimal three-year followup, Hip International, 2005, 15, 33–37Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Teasdall R.D., Webb L.X., Innovations in the management of the hip fractures, Orthopaedics, 2003, 26, 843–849Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tidermark J., Ponzer S., Svensson O., Söderqvist A., Törnkvist H., Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br.], 2003, 85-B, 380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Estrada L.S., Volgas D.A., Stannard J.P., Alonso J.E., Fixation failure in femoral neck fractures, Clin. Orthop., 2002, 399, 110–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Greenough C.G., Jones J.R., Primary total hip replacement for displaced subcapital fracture of the femur, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br.], 1988, 70-B, 639–643Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ruchholtz S., Täger G., Nast-Kolb D., Die infizierte Hüftgelenksendoprothese, Unfallchirurg, 2004, 107, 307–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Taine W.H., Armour P.C., Primary total hip replacement for displaced subcapital fractures of the femur, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br.], 1985, 67-B, 214–217Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    DeLee J.G., Charnley J., Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement, Clin. Orthop., 1976, 121, 20–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Engh C.A., Massin P., Surthers K.E., Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components, Clin. Orthop., 1990, 257, 107–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., Amstutz H.C.: “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening, Clin. Orthop., 1979, 141, 17–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Abboud J.A., Patel R.V., Booth R.E., Nazarian D.G., Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty are similar for patients with displaced femoral neck fractures and osteoarthritis, Clin. Orthop., 2004, 421, 151–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Delamarter R., Moreland J.R., Treatment of acute femoral neck fractures with total hip arthroplasty, Clin. Orthop., 1987, 218, 68–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Gebhard J.S., Amstutz H.C., Zinar D.M., Dorey F.J., A comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of acute fracture of the femoral neck, Clin. Orthop., 1992, 282, 123–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Healy W.L., Iorio R., Total hip arthroplasty: optimal treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, Clin. Orthop., 2004, 429, 43–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Jónsson B., Sernbo I., Carlsson A., Fredin H., Johnell O., Social function after cervical hip fracture: a comparison of hook-pins and total hip replacement in 47 patients, Acta Orthop. Scand., 1996, 67, 431–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Kirschner P., Blum J., Totalendoprotetischer Hüftgelenkersatz: der goldene Standard?, Osteosynthese International, 2000, 8, 173–176Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Rodriguez-Merchan E.C., Displaced intracapsular hip fractures: hemiarthroplasty or total arthroplasty?, Clin. Orthop., 2002, 399, 72–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Rogmark C., Carlsson A., Johnell O., Sernbo I., Costs of internal fixation and arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture, Acta Orthop. Scand., 2003, 74, 293–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Cech O., Dzupa V., Svatos F., The uncemented cup of the CLS Spotorno joint endoprosthesis: 5-years results, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech., 2001, 68, 10–17, (in Czech)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Dzupa V., Cech O., Pacovsky V., Pazdirek P., Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech., 2004, 71, 31–36, (in Czech)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Pazdirek P., Bartonicek J., Dzupa V., The uncemented self-threading Ultima cup: first 5 years experience, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech., 2001, 68, 24–30, (in Czech)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Dzupa V., Cech O., Klezl Z., Krbec M., Our experience with non-cemented femoral components of total endoprostheses of the hip joint type Schenker, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech., 1993, 60, 278–283, (in Czech)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Narayan K.K., George T., Functional outcomes of fracture neck treated with total hip replacement versus bipolar arthroplasty in a South Asian population, Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 2006, 126, 545–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Geesink R., Prevention and treatment of recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, European Instructional Course Lectures, 2005, 7, 127–142Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Landor I., Vavrik P., Sosna A., Bek J., Total hip joint replacement with the Walter type of prosthesis: long-term results, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech., 2001, 68, 281–288, (in Czech)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Morscher E.W., Berli B., Clauss M., Grappiolo G., Outcomes of the MS-30 cemented femoral stem, Acta Chir. Ortop. Traumatol. Cech., 2005, 72, 153–159Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Symeonides P.P., Pournaras J., Petsatodes G., Christoforides J., Hatzokos I., Patazis R., Total hip arthroplasty in neglected congenital dislocation of the hip, Clin. Orthop., 1997, 341, 55–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Josten C., Tiemann A.H., Komplikationen nach proximalen Femurfrakturen, OP-Journal, 2002, 17, 148–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Dayican A., Unal V., Ozkan G., Portakal S., Tumoz M.A., The uncemented CLS expansion cup as a component of a hybrid system in primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study, Hip International, 2004, 14, 223–228Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Grappiolo G., Blaha J.D., Gruen T.A., Burastero G., Spotorno L., Primary total hip arthroplasty using a grit-blasted, press-fit femoral prosthesis: long-term results with survivorship analysis, Hip International, 2002, 12, 55–72Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Stedry V., Hajny P., Long-term outcomes after total hip arthroplasty Poldi, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech., 1997, 64, 282–291, (in Czech)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Bhandari M., Tornetta P., Ellis T., Audige L., Sprague S., Kuo J.C., et al., Hierarchy of evidence: differences in results between non-randomized studies and randomized trials in patients with femoral neck fractures, Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 2004, 124, 10–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Blomfeldt R., Törnkvist H., Ponzer S., Söderqvist A., Tidermark J., Comparison of internal fixation with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures: randomized, controlled trial performed at four years, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 2005, 87-A, 1680–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Jackson M., Learmonth I.D., The treatment of nonunion after intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur, Clin. Orthop., 2002, 399, 119–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Kenzora J.E., Magaziner J., Hudson J., Hebel J.R., Young Y., Hawkes W., et al., Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly, Clin. Orthop., 1998, 348, 51–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Lu-yao G.L., Keller R.B., Littenberg B., Wennberg J.E., Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck: a meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 1994, 76-A, 15–25Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    McKinley J.C., Robinson C.M., Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures with total hip arthroplasty: comparison of primary arthroplasty with early salvage arthroplasty after failed internal fixation, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 2002, 84-A, 2010–2015Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Raaymakers E.L., Schafroth M., Die mediale Schenkelhalsfraktur. Kontroversen in der Behandlung, Unfallchirurg, 2002, 105, 178–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Malchau H., Herberts P., Eisler T., Garellick G., Söderman P., The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.], 2002, 84-A (Suppl 2), 1–20Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Puhl W., Kessler S., Which factors influence the long term outcome of total hip replacement, In: Rieker C., Oreholzer S., Wyss U. (Eds.), World tribology forum in arthroplasty, Huber, Bern, 2001, 35–45Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Steno B., Murarik S., Lisy M., Demitrovic M., Dislocation cemented total hip arthroplasty: risk and therapy, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech., 2000, 67, 33–35, (in Slovak)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Malchau H., Herberts P., Garellick G., Söderman P., Eisler T., Prognosis of total hip replacement: update of results and risk-ratio analysis for revision and re-revision from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register 1979–2000, Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register, Göteborg, 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valér Džupa
    • 1
  • Pavel Pazdírek
    • 1
  • Vladimír Pacovský
    • 1
  • Jan Bartoníček
    • 1
  • Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, 3rd Faculty of MedicineCharles University and University Hospital Královské VinohradyPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations