Communicating risks of foodborne diseases
- 105 Downloads
Foodborne diseases contribute substantially to the overall burden of disease, including hospitalizations, economic loss, and death. Nonetheless, in contrast to food safety experts, the public usually perceives foodborne diseases as low risk, which highlights the differences in the perception of the risk. Many studies have shown that risk perception is a complex concept determined by a variety factors. Among the factors associated with increased concern are high media attention and an impact on children.
Risk communication is a new concept aimed at the providing meaningful, relevant, and accurate information. The purpose is to increase knowledge and enable the recipients to make informed choices. The process of risk communication is complicated by the many contributors, including experts, lay people, risk managers, media, and other stakeholders. It is a two-way process that requires respecting and listening to the contributors. The risk message and its originator are crucial components that account for the success of risk communication.
Communication campaigns aim at raising awareness of hygienic food preparation at home, changing risk behavior, and reducing the number of foodborne infections. By considering the determinants of risk perception and the rules for communicating effectively, risk communication can help preventing foodborne infections and improve public health.
KeywordsRisk communication risk perception foodborne diseases
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- D. Byrne: “Irrational fears or legitimate concerns — Risk perception in perspective”, In: Speech at Risk perception: Science, Public Debate and Policy making conference, Brussels, 4 December 2003, (unpublished).Google Scholar
- M.A. Cañete: “Speech”, on EU conference Risk perception: Science, public debate and policy making, Brussels 4–5 December 2003, (unpublished).Google Scholar
- The Royal Society: “Risk assessment: a study group report”, 1983, p. 94.Google Scholar
- H. Schütz, P.M. Wiedemann and P.C.R. Gray: “Risk perception beyond the psychometric paradigm”, Arbeiten zur Risiko-Kommunikation, Vol. 78, (2000), Forschungszentrum Jüulich, http://www.fz-juelich.de/mut/publikationen/liste_riko.html
- P.M. Sandman: “Risk communication: Facing public outrage”, EPA Journal, (1987), pp. 21-22.Google Scholar
- E. Aakko: “Risk communication, risk perception, and public health”, Wisc. Med. J., Vol. 103, (2004), pp. 25–28.Google Scholar
- O.P. Obermeier: Die Kunst der Risikokommunikation, Gerling Akademie Verlag, 1999, pp. 74-93.Google Scholar
- FAO/WHO: “The application of risk communication to food standards and safety matters”, Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation’, Rome, 2–6 February 1998, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 70.Google Scholar
- R.J. Eiser, S. Miles and L.J. Frewer: “Trust, perceived risk and attitudes toward food technologies”, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., Vol. 32, (2002), pp. 2423–2433.Google Scholar
- K. Blaine and D. Powell: “Communication of food-related risks”, J. Agrobiotech. Manag. Econ., Vol. 4, (2001), pp. 179–185.Google Scholar
- M. Korthals: “Ethics of di.erences in risk perception and views on food safety”, Food Protect. Tr., Vol. 24, (2004), pp. 498–503.Google Scholar
- WHO: “Foodborne surveillance”, http://www.who.int/foodsafety/foodborne_disease/surveillance/en/, (Last visited: 7 Dec 05).
- D. Powell: “An Introduction to Risk Communication and the Perception of Risk”, http://sginrm.ntpu.edu.tw/yml/download/risk04/risk-review.pdf, (Last visited: 7 Dec 05).
- P.M. Sandman: “Explaining risk to non-experts: a communications challenge”, Emergency Preparedness Digest, (1987), pp. 25-29.Google Scholar
- National Research Council: Improving Risk Communication, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
- National Research Council: Improving Risk Communication, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989, p. 175.Google Scholar
- H-D, Werlein and K. Gerlach: “Enterohämorrhagische E. coli (EHEC)”, http://www.harnisch.com/hygiene_report/Enterohaemorrhagische%20E%20coli.pdf, (Last visited: 7 Dec 05).
- V.T. Covello and F.H. Allen: Seven Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication. Pamphlet, U.S. E.P.A., Washington, DC, April 1988.Google Scholar