Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Palomena prasina (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) vibratory signals and their tuning with plant substrates

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Biology

Abstract

Palomena prasina is interesting for the study of vibrational communication within the Pentatomid subfamily Pentatominae, because its host range is limited to woody plants, unlike the better known Nezara viridula, whose vibrational communication is commonly used as a model for the whole family. The vibrational repertoire of P. prasina was described several decades ago and is redescribed in this paper using modern methods for non-contact vibration recording. Additionally, we hypothesized that this species has retained the capacity for signal frequency variation necessary for tuning to resonance properties of various host plants of Pentatominae, but if the signals are emited in the absence of mechanical feedback, they are tuned more specifically to their native acoustic environment — woody plants. By recording live bugs signalling on different substrates and comparing spectral properties of their signals among substrates, we found that there is a match between the signals emitted on a woody branch and those emitted on a non-resonant surface, while spectral properties of signals emitted on herbaceous plants differ. Our findings provide evidence in support of the signal tuning hypothesis and shed further light on the crucial role of substrate in vibrational communication of insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alford D.V., Pests of fruit crops: a color handbook, Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tuncer C., Saruhan İ., Akça İ., The insect pest problem affecting hazelnut kernel quality in Turkey, Acta Hortic., 2005, 686, 367–375

    Google Scholar 

  3. Čokl A., Gogala A., Blaževič A., Principles of sound recognition in three Pentatomide bug species (Heteroptera), Biol. Vestn., 1978, 26, 81–94

    Google Scholar 

  4. Čokl A., Virant-Doberlet M., Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 2003, 48, 29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Čokl A., Stink bug interaction with host plants during communication, J. Insect Physiol., 2008, 54, 1113–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Michelsen A., Flemming F., Gogala M., Traue D., Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1982, 11, 269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Magal C., Schöller M., Tautz J., Casas J., The role of leaf structure in vibration propagation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2000, 108, 2412–2418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Čokl A., Plants as medium for communication with mechanical vibrations, In: Sapri R.C. (Ed.), Mechanical vibrations: measurement, effects and control, Nova Science Publishers, inc., New York, NY, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  9. Čokl A., Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Predatory bug Picromerus bidens communicates at different frequency levels, Cent. Eur. J. Biol, 2011, 6, 431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Polajnar J., Svenšek D., Čokl A., Resonance in herbaceous plant stems as a factor in vibrational communication of pentatomid bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. R. Soc. Interface, 2012, 9, 1898–1907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McVean A., Field L.H., Communication by substratum vibration in the New Zealand tree weta, Hemideina femorata (Stenopelmatidae: Orthoptera), J. Zool., Lond., 1996, 239, 101–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Virant-Doberlet M., Čokl A., Vibrational Communication in Insects, Neotrop. Entomol., 2004, 33, 121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Todd J.W., Ecology and behavior of Nezara viridula, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 1989, 34, 273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Panizzi A.R., McPherson J.E., James D.G., Javahery M., McPherson R.M., Stink bugs (Pentatomidae), In: Schaefer C.W., Panizzi A.R. (Eds.), Heteroptera of economic importance, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  15. McNett G.D., Cocroft R.B., Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers, Behav. Ecol., 2008, 16, 650–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Čokl A., Species recognition during substrate-borne communication in Nezara viridula (L.) (Pentatomidae: Heteroptera), J. Insect Behav., 2011, 24, 468–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Polajnar J., Čokl A., The effect of vibratory disturbance on sexual behaviour of the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae), Centr. Eur. J. Biol., 2008, 3, 189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Charif R.A., Waack A.M., Strickman L.M., Raven Pro 1.4 User’s Manual, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  19. Čokl A., McBrien H.L., Millar J.G., Comparison of substrate-borne vibrational signals of two stink bug species, Acrosternum hilare and Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., 2001, 94, 471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Čokl A., Virant-Doberlet M., Stritih N., Structure and function of songs emitted by southern green stink bugs from Brazil, Florida, Italy and Slovenia, Physiol. Entomol., 2000, 25, 196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blassioli Moraes M.C., Laumann R.A., Čokl A., Borges M., Vibratory signals of four Neotropical stink bug species, Physiol. Entomol, 2005, 30, 175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McBrien H.L., Čokl A., Millar J.G., Comparison of substrate-borne vibrational signals of two congeneric stink bug species, Thyanta pallidovirens and T. custator accera (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. Ins. Behav., 2002, 15, 715–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pavlovčič P., Čokl A., Songs of Holcostethus strictus (Fabricius): a different repertoire among landbugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Behav. Proc., 2001, 53, 65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cavalcante A., Silva C., Laumann R.A., Cavalcante Ferreira J.B., Blassioli Moraes M.C., Borges M., et al., Reproductive biology, mating behavior, and vibratory communication of the Brown-Winged Stink Bug, Edessa meditabunda (Fabr.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Psyche, 2012, 2012, 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gogala M., Vibratory signals produced by Heteroptera — Pentatomomorpha and Cimicomorpha, In: Drosopoulos S., Claridge M.F. (Eds.), Insect sounds and communication, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  27. Čokl A., Zorović M., Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Tuning of host plants with vibratory songs of Nezara viridula L (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. Exp. Biol., 2005, 208, 1481–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cocroft R.B., Rodríguez R.L., Hunt R.E., Host shifts and signal divergence: mating signals covary with host use in a complex of specialized plant-feeding insects, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 99, 60–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodríguez R.L., Ramaswamy K., Cocroft R.B., Evidence that female preferences have shaped signal evolution in a clade of specialized plantfeeding insects, Proc. R. Soc. B, 2006, 273, 2585–2593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sullivan-Beckers L., Cocroft R.B., The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals, Evolution, 2010, 64, 3158–3171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Elias D.O., Mason A.C., Hoy R.R., The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus dossenus (Araneae: Salticidae), J. Exp. Biol., 2004, 207, 4105–4110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Henry C.S., Martínez Wells M.L., Adaptation or random change? The evolutionary response of songs to substrate properties in lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla), Anim. Behav., 2004, 68, 879–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cocroft R.B., Rodríguez R.L., The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication, BioScience, 2005, 55, 323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Endler J.A., Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution, Am. Nat., 1992, 139, S125–S153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Endler J.A., Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 1993, 340, 215–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Biology, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Jernej Polajnar, Andreja Kavčič, Alenka Žunič Kosi & Andrej Čokl

  2. Fondazione Edmund Mach, IT-38010, S. Michele all’Adige, Italy

    Jernej Polajnar

Authors
  1. Jernej Polajnar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreja Kavčič
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alenka Žunič Kosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrej Čokl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jernej Polajnar.

About this article

Cite this article

Polajnar, J., Kavčič, A., Kosi, A.Ž. et al. Palomena prasina (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) vibratory signals and their tuning with plant substrates. cent.eur.j.biol. 8, 670–680 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0188-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0188-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation