Skip to main content
Log in

Macrofungal diversity in disturbed vegetation types in North-East Hungary

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Biology

Abstract

Macrofungi play an extraordinarily important role in the catalysis of the nutrient cycle of deciduous and coniferous forests. Habitat degradation adversely influences the number of fruiting bodies of macrofungi and diminishes the diversity of the fungal community. The diversity of the terricolous- and lignicolous macrofungi assemblages were compared in stands of semi-natural and two plant associations modified by humans in different degrees in North-East Hungary. We used data from 15 permanent plots that were sampled for vascular plants and macrofungi. Rank-abundance curves and Rényi’s diversity profiles were applied for diversity research. The results indicated that structure and diversity of the terricolous macrofungi assemblages were mainly influenced by climatic and habitat conditions and the degradation of the plant associations to a lesser degree. The diversity of lignicolous macrofungi was primarily affected by the continuous presence, quality, and quantity of deadwood. Accordingly, the form and degree of forest management, as well as the age of the growing stocks, influenced community structure. If nature conservation planning and conservation activity are based on those biodiversity indicators which are good proxies for macrofungi biodiversity, the latter might be optimal for preserving macrofungi biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Standovár T., Primack R.B., Basis of Conservation Biology (in Hungarian). Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó Rt., Budapest, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haas H., Macrofungi of forest associations inWürttemberg region [Die Bodenbewohnenden Grosspilze in den Waldformationen einiger Gebiete von Württemberg], Beih. Bot.Central., 1932, 50, 35–134 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohus G., Babos M., Coenology of terricolous macroscopic fungi of deciduous forests, Botanischer Jahrbücher, 1960, 80, 1–100

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bohus G., Babos M., Mycocoenological investigation of acidophilous deciduous forests in Hungary, Botanischer Jahrbücher, 1967, 87, 304–360

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jahn H., Nespiak A., Tüxen R., Mycosociological examination of beech forests of Wesser Mts. [Pilzsoziologische Untersuchungen in Buchenwäldern des Wesergebirges], Mitt. Fl.-Soz. AG. N.F., 1967, 11/12, 159–197 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lisiewska M., Macromycetes of Beech forests within the Eastern part of the Fagus area in Europe, Acta Mycol., 1974, 10, 3–72

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bujakiewich A., Macrofungi on soil in deciduous forests, In: Winterhoff W., (Ed.), Fungi in Vegetation Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pál-Fám F., Mycological characterization and comparison of climax forest associations in the Mecsek Mountains, Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung., 2002, 49/2–3, 177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnolds E., The changing macromycete flora in the Netherlands, Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., 1988, 90, 391–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnolds E., Decline of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Europe, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 1991 35, 209–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zak J.C., Response of soil fungal communities to disturbance, pp. 403–425. In: Carroll G., Wicklow D.T., (Eds.), The fungal Community: Its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller R.M., Lodge D.J., Fungal Response to Disturbance: Agriculture and Forestry, In: Söderström B.E., (Ed.), The Mycota IV Environmental and Microbial Relationships, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  13. Villeneuve N., Grandtner M.M., Fortin J.A., Frequency and diversity of ectomycorrhizal and saprophytic macrofungi in the Laurentide Mountains of Quebec, Can. J. Bot., 1989, 67, 2616–2629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnolds E., Macrofungal communities outside forests, In: Winterhoff W., (Ed.), Fungi in Vegetation Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nantel P., Neumann P., Ecology of ectomycorrhizalbasidiomycete communities on a local vegetation gradient, Ecology, 1992, 73, 99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Packham J.M., May T.W., Brown M.J., Wardlaw T.J., Mills A.K., Macrofungal diversity and community ecology in mature and regrowth wet eucalypt forest in Tasmania: a multivariate study, Aust. J. Ecol., 2002, 27, 149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Benedek L., Pál-Fám F., Nagy J., Comparison of macrofungi communities and examination of macrofungi-plant interactions in forest stands in North Hungary, Int. J. Horticult. Sci., 2005, 11, 101–103

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brown N., Bhagwat S., Watkinson S., Macrofungal diversity in fragmented and disturbed forests of the Western Ghats of India, J. Appl. Ecol., 2006, 43, 11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gabel A.C., Gabel M.L., Comparison of Diversity of Macrofungi and Vascular Plants at Seven Sites in the Black Hills of South Dakota, Am. Midl. Nat., 2007, 157, 258–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pál-Fám F., Siller I., Fodor L., Mycological monitoring in the Hungarian Biodiversity Monitoring System, Acta Mycol., 2007, 42, 35–58

    Google Scholar 

  21. Magurran A.E., Ecological Diversity and its Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1988

    Google Scholar 

  22. Siller I., Macrofungi of montane beech forest reserves, Dissertation, Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary, 2004 (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Naveh Z., Whittaker R.H., Structural and floristic diversity of shrublands and woodlands in northern Israel and other Mediterranean areas, Vegetatio, 1979, 41, 171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zólyomi B., Natural vegetation 1:1 500 000, In: Pécsi M., (Ed.), National atlas of Hungary, Institute of Geography, Budapest, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dorgai L., Cserehát, Association of Agricultural Cooperatives of BAZ County, HAS Academic Comission of Miskolc, 1986 (in Hungarian)

  26. Bullock J.M., Plants, In: Sutherland W.J., (Ed.), Ecological census techniques: a handbook, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2006

  27. Simon T., Identification handbook of the Hungarian vascular plants, Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó RT., Budapest, 2000 (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Krieglsteiner G.J., Atlas of Spreading of Macrofungi in Germany Vol 1. [Verbreitungsatlas der Großpilze Deutschlands, Band 1], Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1991 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Krieglsteiner G.J., Atlas of Spreading of Macrofungi in Germany Vol 2. [Verbreitungsatlas der Großpilze Deutschlands, Band 2], Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1991 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  30. CABI, The Index Fungorum, 2008, http://www. indexfungorum.org

  31. Whittaker R.H., Communities and ecosystems, 1st ed., Macmillan, New York, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tóthmérész B., NuCoSa 1.0: Number Cruncher for Community Studies and other Ecological Applications, Abstr. Bot., 1993, 7, 283–287

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tóthmérész B., Diversity orderings, Scientia, Budapest, 1997 (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Borhidi A., Social Behaviour Types of the Hungarian Flora, its naturalness and relative ecological indicator values, Publication of University of Janus Pannonius, Pécs, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  35. Morschhauser T., Applications of isodegradation curves in nature conservation. Acta Bot. Hung., 1995, 39, 393–405

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rudolf K., Pál-Fám F., Morschhauser T., Macrofungi of Cserehát, Clusiana, 2008, 47, 45–74 (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Borhidi A., Plant associations of Hungary, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 2003 (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schmit J.P., Mueller G.M., Leacock P.R., Mata J.L., Wu Q., Huang Y., Assessment of tree species richness as a surrogate for macrofungal species richness, Biol. Conserv., 2005, 121, 99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kost G., Macrofungi on soil in coniferous forest. In: Winterhoff W. (Ed.), Fungi in Vegetation Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kost G., Haas H., The Mushroom flora of Protected Forests in Baden-Würtenberg [Die Pilzfora von Bannwäldern in Baden-Würtenberg], „Waldschutzgebiete“ im Rahmen der Mitt. Forstl. Ver. und Forsch. Anst, 1989, 4, 9–182 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Høiland K., Bendiksen E., Biodiversity of woodinhabiting fungi in a boreal coniferous forest in Sør-Trøndelag County, central Norway, Nord. J. Bot., 1996, 16, 643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kinga Rudolf.

About this article

Cite this article

Rudolf, K., Morschhauser, T. & Pál-Fám, F. Macrofungal diversity in disturbed vegetation types in North-East Hungary. cent.eur.j.biol. 7, 634–647 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-012-0050-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-012-0050-3

Keywords

Navigation