Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of environmental factors on weed species composition of cereal and stubble fields in western Hungary

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Biology

Abstract

Multivariate analysis of data obtained from 184 cereal and stubble fields in low-input agricultural systems located in western Hungary was undertaken in order to asses environmental factors affecting weed species composition. For each variable, the gross and net effect on weed species composition was calculated. All variables considered in this study had a significant effect on weed species composition and explained 26.99% of the total variation. Most variation in species composition was explained by the aspect (cereal vs. stubble), followed by soil pH, mean annual precipitation, soil texture, mean annual temperature, and altitude. Separating the cereals and stubbles soil pH became the most important factor. Our results suggest that during the long vegetation period, cereal weed communities dominated by winter annuals are replaced by stubble-field weed communities dominated by summer annuals. This seasonal change may also have the same important effect on weed species composition as crop types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cimalová S., Lososová Z., Arable weed vegetation of the northeastern part of the Czech Republic: effects of environmental factors on species composition, Plant Ecol., 2009, 203, 45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fried G., Norton L.R., Reboud X., Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2008, 128, 68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Šilc U., Vrbničanin S., BožiĆ D., Čarni A., Stevanović D., Phytosociological alliances in the vegetation of arable fields in the northwestern Balkan Peninsula, Phytocoenologia, 2008, 38, 241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ujvárosi M., Gyomirtás (Weed control), Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, Budapest, 1973, (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holzner W., Weed species and weed communities, Vegetatio, 1978, 38, 13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider C., Sukopp U., Sukopp H., Biologischökologische Grundlagen des Schutzes gefährdeter Segetalpflanzen, Schriftenreihe f. Vegetationskunde 26, Bonn-Bad Godersberg, 1994, (in German)

  7. Litterski B., Jörns S., Der Einfluss extensiven Anbaus von Winterroggen auf die Segetalflora und vegetation — eine Untersuchung in Nordosdeutschland, Z. Pflanzenk. Pflanzen., 2004, 19, 65–72, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Šilc U., Čarni A., Changes in weed vegetation on extensively managed fields of central Slovenia between 1939 and 2002, Biologia, 2005, 60, 409–416

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pinke G., Pál R., Phytosociological and conservational study of the arable weed communities in western Hungary, Plant Biosyst., 2008, 142, 491–508

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pinke G., Pál R., Floristic composition and conservation value of the stubble-field weed community, dominated by Stachys annua in western Hungary, Biologia, 2009, 64, 279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinke G., Pál R., Botta-Dukát Z., Chytrý M., Weed vegetation and its conservation value in three management systems of Hungarian winter cereals on base-rich soils, Weed Res., 2009, 49, 544–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marosi S., Somogyi S., Magyarország kistájainak katasztere (Regional cadastres in Hungary). MTA Földrajz Kut Int, Budapest, 1990, (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dierschke H., Pflanzensoziologie: Grundlagen und Methoden. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1994, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hofmeister H., Garve E., Lebensraum Acker. Blackwell, Berlin, 1998, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Legendre P., Gallagher E., Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data, Oecologia, 2001, 129, 271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lososová Z., Chytrý M., Cimalová Š., Kropáč Z., Otýpková Z., Pyšek P., et al., Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: Gradients of diversity and species composition, J. Veg. Sci., 2004, 15, 415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org., 2009

    Google Scholar 

  18. Šilc U., Vrbničanin S., Božić D., Čarni A., Stevanović D., Weed vegetation in the north-western Balkans: diversity and species composition, Weed Res., 2009, 49, 602–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tarmi S., Helenius J., Hyvönen T., Importance of edaphic, spatial and management factors for plant communities of field boundaries, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2009, 131, 201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holzner W., Hayashi I., Glauninger J., Reproductive strategy of annual agrestals, In: Holzner W., Numata N., (Eds.), Biology an ecology of weeds, Junk, Hague, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ubrizsy G., Vizsgálatok őszi búzavetés agrofitocönózisában (Surveys on the agrophytocoenoses of winter wheat stands), Növénytermelés, 1954, 3, 281–299, (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pinke G., Pál R., Gyomnövényeink eredete, termőhelye és védelme (The origin, habitat and conservation of our arable weeds), Alexandra Kiadó, Pécs, 2005, (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kropáč Z., Hadač E., Hejný S., Some remarks on the synecological and syntaxonomic problems of weed plant communities, Preslia, 1971, 43, 139–153

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lososová Z., Chytrý M., Cimalová Š., Otýpková Z., Pyšek P., Tichý L., Classification of weed vegetation of arable land in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, Folia Geobot., 2006, 41, 259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hüppe J., Hofmeister H., Syntaxonomische Fassung und Übersicht über die Ackerunkrautgesellschaften der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Ber. Reinh. Tüxen-Ges., 1990, 2, 61–81, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mucina L., Stellarietea mediae, In: Mucina L., Grabherr G., Elmmauer T., (Eds.), Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Teil I. Anthropogene Vegetation, Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1993, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kropáč Z., Segetal vegetation in the Czech Republic: synthesis and syntaxonomical revision, Preslia, 2006, 78, 123–209

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oberdorfer E., Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften, Teil III, Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1983, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Glemnitz M., Radics L., Hoffmann J., Czimber G., Weed species richness and species composition of different arable field types — A comparative analysis along a climate gradient from south to north Europe, J. Plant Dis. Protect., 2006, 20, 577–586

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schubert R., Mahn E., Übersicht über die Ackerunkrautgesellschaften Mitteldeutschlands, Fedd. Repert., 1968, 80, 133–304, (in German)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Meisel K., Veränderung der Ackerunkraut- und Grünlandvegetation in landwirtschaftlichen Intensivgebieten, Schrr. Dt. Rat. Landespfl., 1983, 42, 168–173, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Andreasen C., Skovgaard I.M., Crop and soil factors of importance for the distribution of plant species on arable fields in Denmark, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2009, 133, 61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinke G., Letzte Vorkommen von Caucalion-Arten im Nordwesten Ungarns. Z. Pflanzenk. Pflanzen., 2004, 19, 73–82, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pinke G., Pál R., Király G., Szendrődi V., Mesterházy A., The occurrence and habitat conditions of Anthoxanthum puelii Lecoq & Lamotte and other Atlantic-Mediterranean weed species in Hungary, J. Plant Dis. Protect., 2006, 20, 587–596

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ries C., Überblick über die Ackerunkrautvegetation Österreichs und ihre Entwicklung in neurer Zeit, Diss., Bot., 1992, 187, 1–188, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ujvárosi M., Gyomnövények (Weeds), Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, Budapest, 1973, (in Hungarian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyula Pinke.

About this article

Cite this article

Pinke, G., Pál, R. & Botta-Dukát, Z. Effects of environmental factors on weed species composition of cereal and stubble fields in western Hungary. cent.eur.j.biol. 5, 283–292 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-009-0079-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-009-0079-0

Keywords

Navigation