Abstract
On (4, 6, 12) and (4, 82) Archimedean lattices, the critical properties of the majority-vote model are considered and studied using the Glauber transition rate proposed by Kwak et al. [Kwak et al., Phys. Rev. E, 75, 061110 (2007)] rather than the traditional majority-vote with noise [Oliveira, J. Stat. Phys. 66, 273 (1992)]. We obtain T c and the critical exponents for this Glauber rate from extensive Monte Carlo studies and finite size scaling. The calculated values of the critical temperatures and Binder cumulant are T c = 0.651(3) and U *4 = 0.612(5), and T c = 0.667(2) and U *4 = 0.613(5), for (4, 6, 12) and (4, 82) lattices respectively, while the exponent (ratios) β/ν, γ/ν and 1/ν are respectively: 0.105(8), 1.48(11) and 1.16(5) for (4, 6, 12); and 0.113(2), 1.60(4) and 0.84(6) for (4, 82) lattices. The usual Ising model and the majority-vote model on previously studied regular lattices or complex networks differ from our new results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Galam, J. Math. Psychol. 30, 426 (1986)
S. Galam, J. Stat. Phys. 61, 943 (1990)
S. Fortunato, M. Macy, S. Redner, Editorial, J. Stat. Phys. 151, 1 (2013)
S. Galam, J. Stat. Phys. 151, 46 (2013)
S. Galam, Physica A 336, 49 (2004)
D. Stauffer, J. Stat. Phys. 151, 9 (2013)
S. Galam, Sociophysics: A Physicist’s Modeling of Psycho-political Phenomena (Springer, Berlin, 2012)
M. J. de Oliveira, J. Stat. Phys. 66, 273 (1992)
M. A. Santos, S. Teixeira, J. Stat. Phys. 78, 963 (1995)
L. Crochik, T. Tomé, Phys. Rev. E 72, 057103 (2005)
W. Lenz, Z. Phys. 21, 613 (1920)
E. Ising, Z. Phys. 31, 253 (1925)
M. Hasenbusch, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 911 (2001)
J. J. Binney, N. J. Dowrick, A. J. Fisher, M. E. J. Newman, A theory of critical phenomena. An Introduction to the renormalization group (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992)
G. Grinstein, C. Jayaprakash, Y. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2527 (1985)
P. R. Campos, V. M. Oliveira, F. G. B. Moreira, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026104 (2003)
E. M. S. Luz, F. W. S. Lima, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18, 1251 (2007)
L. F. C. Pereira, F. G. B. Moreira, Phys. Rev. E 71, 016123 (2005)
F. W. S. Lima, A. O. Sousa, M. A. Sumour, Physica A 387, 3503 (2008)
F. W. S. Lima, U. L. Fulco, R. N. C. Filho, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036105 (2005)
F. W. S. Lima, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 17, 1257 (2006)
F. W. S. Lima, A. A. Moreira, A. D. Araújo, Phys. Rev. E 86, 056109 (2012)
F. W. S. Lima, Commun. Comput. Phys. 2, 358 (2007)
A. D. Sánchez, J. M. Lopes, M. A. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 048701 (2002)
P. Erdős, A. Rényi, Publ. Math. 6, 290 (1959)
P. Erdős, A. Rényi, Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci. 5, 17 (1960)
F. W. S. Lima, J. E. Moreira, J. S. Andrade, Jr., U. M. S. Costa, Physica A 283, 100 (2000)
F. W. S. Lima, U. M. S. Costa, M. P. Almeida, J. S. Andrade, Jr., Eur. Phys. J. B 17, 111 (2000)
A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999)
A. Aleksiejuk, J. A. Hołyst, D. Stauffer, Physica A 310, 260 (2002)
F. W. S. Lima, K. Malarz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 17, 1273 (2006)
J. C. Santos, F. W. S. Lima, K. Malarz, Physica A 390, 359 (2011)
J.-S. Yang, I.-M. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 77, 051122 (2008)
Z.-X. Wu, P. Holme, Phys. Rev. E 81, 011133 (2010)
P. N. Suding, R. M. Ziff, Phys. Rev. E 60, 275 (1999)
K. Malarz, M. Zborek, B. Wróbel, TASK Quarterly 9, 475 (2005)
W. Kwak, J.-S. Yang, J.-I. Shon, I.-M. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 75, 061110 (2007)
K. Binder, D. W. Heermann, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics (Springer Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, 1988)
R. Albert, A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 286, 47 (2002)
S. N. Dorogovtsev, J. F. F. Mendes, Adv. Phys. 51, 1079 (2002)
M. E. J. Newman, SIAM Rev. 45, 167 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Lima, F.W.S. Nonequilibrium model on Archimedean lattices. centr.eur.j.phys. 12, 185–191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-014-0435-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-014-0435-1