Skip to main content
Log in

Choice functions and well-orderings over the infinite binary tree

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Mathematics

Abstract

We give a new proof showing that it is not possible to define in monadic second-order logic (MSO) a choice function on the infinite binary tree. This result was first obtained by Gurevich and Shelah using set theoretical arguments. Our proof is much simpler and only uses basic tools from automata theory. We show how the result can be used to prove the inherent ambiguity of languages of infinite trees. In a second part we strengthen the result of the non-existence of an MSO-definable well-founded order on the infinite binary tree by showing that every infinite binary tree with a well-founded order has an undecidable MSO-theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold A., Rational ω-languages are nonambiguous, Theoret. Comput. Sci., 1983, 26(1–2), 221–223

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Büchi J.R., On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic, In: Proceedings of International Congress on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1962, 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  3. Büchi J.R., Landweber L.H., Solving sequential conditions by finite-state strategies, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1969, 138, 295–311

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Carayol A., Wöhrle S., The Caucal hierarchy of infinite graphs in terms of logic and higher-order pushdown automata, In: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, FST TCS 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2914, Springer, Berlin, 2003, 112–123

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carayol A., Löding C., MSO on the infinite binary tree: choice and order, In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the European Association for Computer Science Logic, CSL 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4646, Springer, Berlin, 2007, 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caucal D., On infinite terms having a decidable monadic theory, In: Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, MFCS 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2420, Springer, Berlin, 2002, 165–176

    Google Scholar 

  7. Church A., Logic, Arithmetic and Automata, In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Stockholm 1962), Inst. Mittag-Leffler, Djursholm, 1963, 23–35

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dawar A., Grädel E., The descriptive complexity of parity games, In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic, CSL 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5213, Springer, Berlin, 2008, 354–368

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ebbinghaus H.-D., Flum J., Finite Model Theory, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer, Berlin, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grädel E., Thomas W., Wilke T., Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2500, Springer, Berlin, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gurevich Y., Shelah S., Rabin’s uniformization problem, J. Symbolic Logic, 1983, 48(4), 1105–1119

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kähler D., Wilke T., Complementation, disambiguation, and determinization of Büchi automata unified, In: Proceedings of the 35th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP 2008, Part I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5125, Springer, Berlin, 2008, 724–735

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lifsches S., Shelah S., Uniformization, choice functions and well orders in the class of trees, J. Symbolic Logic, 1996, 61(4), 1206–1227

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lifsches S., Shelah S., Uniformization and Skolem functions in the class of trees, J. Symbolic Logic, 1998, 63(1), 103–127

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Löding C., Automata and Logics over Infinite Trees, Habilitationsschrift, RWTH Aachen, 2009

  16. McNaughton R., Testing and generating infinite sequences by a finite automaton, Information and Control, 1966, 9(5), 521–530

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Monti A., Peron A., Systolic tree ω-languages: the operational and the logical view, Theoret. Comput. Sci., 2000, 233(1–2), 1–18

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mostowski A.W., Regular expressions for infinite trees and a standard form of automata, In: Computation Theory, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 208, Springer, Berlin, 1984, 157–168

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rabin M.O., Decidability of second-order theories and automata on infinite trees, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1969, 141, 1–35

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Rabin M.O., Automata on Infinite Objects and Church’s Problem, American Mathematical Society, Boston, 1972

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rabinovich A., On decidability of monadic logic of order over the naturals extended by monadic predicates, Inform. and Comput., 2007, 205(6), 870–889

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Safra S., On the complexity of ω-automata, In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FoCS 1988, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 1988, 319–327

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Seidl H., Deciding equivalence of Finite tree automata, SIAM J. Comput., 1990, 19(3), 424–437

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Semenov A.L., Decidability of monadic theories, In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, MFCS 1984, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 176, Springer, Berlin, 1984, 162–175

    Google Scholar 

  25. Siefkes D., The recursive sets in certain monadic second order fragments of arithmetic, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforsch., 1975, 17(1–2), 71–80

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Stearns R.E., Hunt H.B., On the equivalence and containment problems for unambiguous regular expressions, regular grammars and finite automata, SIAM J. Comput., 1985, 14(3), 598–611

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas W., Automata on infinite objects, In: Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, B: Formal Models and Semantics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990, 133–191

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas W., On the synthesis of strategies in infinite games, In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS’ 95, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 900, Springer, Berlin, 1995, 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas W., Languages, automata, and logic, In: Handbook of Formal Language Theory, 3, Springer, Berlin, 1997, 389–455

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas W., Church’s problem and a tour through automata theory, In: Pillars of Computer Science, Essays Dedicated to Boris (Boaz) Trakhtenbrot on the Occasion of His 85th Birthday, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4800, Springer, Berlin, 2008, 635–655

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnaud Carayol.

About this article

Cite this article

Carayol, A., Löding, C., Niwinski, D. et al. Choice functions and well-orderings over the infinite binary tree. centr.eur.j.math. 8, 662–682 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11533-010-0046-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11533-010-0046-z

MSC

Keywords

Navigation