Skip to main content
Log in

On equivalences of derived and singular categories

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Mathematics

Abstract

Let X and Y be two smooth Deligne-Mumford stacks and consider a pair of functions f: X\( \mathbb{A}^1 \), g:Y\( \mathbb{A}^1 \). Assuming that there exists a complex of sheaves on X × \( \mathbb{A}^1 \) Y which induces an equivalence of D b(X) and D b(Y), we show that there is also an equivalence of the singular derived categories of the fibers f −1(0) and g −1(0). We apply this statement in the setting of McKay correspondence, and generalize a theorem of Orlov on the derived category of a Calabi-Yau hypersurface in a weighted projective space, to products of Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in simplicial toric varieties with nef anticanonical class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballard M., Equivalences of derived categories of sheaves on quasi-projective schemes, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.3148

  2. Bezrukavnikov R., Kaledin D., McKay equivalence for symplectic resolutions of singularities, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0401002

  3. Bridgeland T., King A., Reid M., The McKay correspondence as an equivalence of derived categories, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 2001, 14(3), 535–554

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen J.-C., Flop sand equivalences of derived categories for three folds with only terminal Gorenstein singularities, J. Differential Geom., 2002, 61(2), 227–261

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox D., Little J., Schenck H., Toric varieties, book in preparation, available at http://www.cs.amherst.edu/_dac/toric.html

  6. Edidin D., Notes on the construction of the moduli space of curves, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9805101

  7. Fulton W., Introduction to toric varieties. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 131, The William H. Roever Lectures in Geometry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fujino O., Sato H., Introduction to the toric Mori theory, Michigan Math. J., 2004, 52(3), 649–665

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hernández Ruiprez D., López Martín A.C., de Salas F.S., Fourier-Mukai transforms for Gorenstein schemes, Adv. Math., 2007, 211(2), 594–620

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Huybrechts D., Fourier-Mukai transforms in algebraic geometry, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Isik M.U., private communication

  12. Kawamata Y., Log crepant birational maps and derived categories, J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 2005, 12(2), 211–231

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawamata Y., Derived Categories and Birational Geometry, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.3150

  14. Kresch A., On the geometry of Deligne-Mumford stacks, Algebraic geometry—Seattle 2005. Part 1, 259–271, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 80, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kontsevich M., Homological algebra of mirror symmetry, In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Zürich, 1994), Birkhäuser, Basel, 1995, 120–139

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuznetsov A., Hyperplane sections and derived categories, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat., 2006, 70(3), 23–128 (in Russian); English translation: Izv. Math., 2006, 70(3), 447–547

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Laumon G., Moret-Bailly L., Champs algébriques, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Vol. 39, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuki K., Introduction to the Mori program, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehrotra S., Triangulated categories of singularities, matrix factorizations and LG models, PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Neeman A., The Grothendieck duality theorem via Bousfield’s techniques and Brown representability, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 1996, 9(1), 205–236

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Nironi F., Grothendieck Duality for Projective Deligne-Mumford Stacks, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.1955

  22. Orlov D., Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in Landau-Ginzburg models, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0302304

  23. Orlov D., Derived categories of coherent sheaves and triangulated categories of singularities, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0503632

  24. Quintero-Vélez A., McKay Correspondence for Landau-Ginzburg models, Commun. Number Theory Phys., 2009, 3(1), 173–208

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomason R.W., Trobaugh T., Higher algebraic K-theory of schemes and of derived categories, The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. III, 247–435, Progr. Math., 88, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Vistoli A., Intersection theory on algebraic tacks and on their moduli spaces, Invent. Math., 1989, 97(3), 613–670

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Baranovsky, V., Pecharich, J. On equivalences of derived and singular categories. centr.eur.j.math. 8, 1–14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11533-009-0063-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11533-009-0063-y

MSC

Keywords

Navigation