Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between the mercury concentration in fish muscles and scales/fins and its significance

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Chemistry

Abstract

The determination of mercury in fish typically involves analysis of muscles. For predicting the concentration of mercury in fish muscle on the basis of the analysis of fish scales or fins, the relationship between total mercury concentrations in fish muscles and in fish scales and fins was studied. Mercury content in fish muscles, scales and fins was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry with thermal decomposition of the sample in a flow of oxygen. A number of scale treatments were applied in order to remove impurities and to enhance the prediction quality. For scale treatment, 40 min of washing with DI water in an ultrasonic bath is recommended. A coefficient of determination r2= 0.93 for the relationship between Hg concentrations in muscles and scales was achieved for 40 fish among the different fish species tested (European bream, perch, roach) from the Hamry Reservoir, Czech Republic. With respect to fin sampling, the coefficient of determination r2 for these fish was 0.86. The analysis of fish scales and caudal fins is a useful screening tool for assessing the relative mercury contamination of monitored fish. The method of sampling scales is not suitable for fish species with small scales such as brown trout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Grinberg, R.C. Campos, Z. Mester, R.E. Sturgeon, Spectrochim. Acta Part B 58, 427 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Cai, J.M. Bayona, J. Chromatography A 696, 113 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Yang, V. Colombini, P. Maxwell, Z. Mester, R.E. Sturgeon, J. Chromatography A 1011, 135 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C.T. Costley, K.F. Mossop, J.R. Dean, L.M. Garden, J. Marshall, J. Carroll, Anal. Chim. Acta 405, 179 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Červenka, H. Zelinková, M. Konečná, J. Komárek, Analytical Sciences 26, 989 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Cai, S. Monsalud, R. Jaffé, R.D. Jones, J. Chromatography A 876, 147 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H.E.L. Armstrong, W.T. Corns, P.B. Stockwell, G. O’Connor, L. Ebdon, E.H. Evans, Anal. Chim. Acta 390, 245 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Krystek, R. Ritsema, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 381, 354 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. L. Gómez-Ariza, F. Lorenzo, T. García-Barrera, Appl. Organometal. Chem. 19, 600 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Abrankó, B. Kmellár, P. Fodor, Microchemical Journal 85, 122 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Kuballa, E. Leonheardt, K. Schoeberl, D.W. Lachenmeier, Eur. Food Res. Technol. 228, 425 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R.F. Baker, P.J. Blanchfield, M.J. Paterson, R.J. Flett, L. Wesson, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133, 568 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C.J. Schmitt, W.G. Brumbaugh, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 53, 84 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.L. Lake, S.A. Ryba, J.R. Serbst, A.D. Libby, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 50, 539 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.P. Farrell, A.H. Hodaly, S. Wang, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 39, 515 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. K.R. Rolphus, M.B. Sandheinrich, J.G. Wiener, S.W. Bailey, K.A. Thoreson, Ch.R. Hammerschmidt, Environ Sci. Technol 42, 871 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Desjardins, C. Gobeil, B. Sundbby, Estuaries and Coasts 29, 855 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Beaudin, S.C. Johannessen, R.W. Macdonald, Anal. Chem. 82, 8785 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. P.T. Gremillion, J.V. Cizdziel, N.R. Cody, Environ. Chem. 2, 96 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J.R. Ikingura, H. Akagi, Sci. Total. Environ. 304, 355 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Houserová, V. Kubáň, S. Kráčmar, J. Sitko, Environ. Pollution 145, 185 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Yan, A. Rustadbakken, H. Yao, T. Larssen, X. Feng, T. Liu, L. Shang, T.O. Haugen, J. Environ. Sci. 22, 1129 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef Komárek.

About this article

Cite this article

Červenka, R., Bednařík, A., Komárek, J. et al. The relationship between the mercury concentration in fish muscles and scales/fins and its significance. cent.eur.j.chem. 9, 1109–1116 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-011-0105-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-011-0105-8

Keywords

Navigation