Central European Journal of Chemistry

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 1124–1147 | Cite as

Rigorous modelling and optimization of hybrid separation processes based on pervaporation

Research Article
  • 196 Downloads

Abstract

Hybrid separation processes are becoming more and more important in the practice if membrane technologies are also involved. In this work, a systematic investigation is completed for three sequence alternatives of distillation and pervaporation. These are the following: pervaporation followed with distillation (PV+D), distillation followed with pervaporation (D+PV), two distillation columns and a pervaporation unit between them (D+PV+D). The hybrid separation process alternatives are evaluated with rigorous modelling tools, but first, a rigorous simulation algorithm is determined for the pervaporation. The three hybrid separation processes are rigorously modelled with CHEMCAD, and optimized with the dynamic programming optimization method for the case of the separation of ethanol-water mixture. The objective function is the total annual cost (TAC). The energy consumption is also investigated. The selection of the ethanol-water mixture has two motivations: (i) it is quite often studied and well known, and (ii) to make biofuel (ethanol) production more economical, membrane technologies might also be applied. The results are compared with each other and with the classical separation completed with heteroazeotropic distillation. The optimized TAC shows that the distillation column followed with pervaporation is the most economical hybrid separation process alternative. Its TAC is about 66% of that of the classical separation.

Keywords

hybrid separation processes CHEMCAD 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    P. Mizsey: “Waste reduction in the chemical industry: a two level problem”, J. Hazard Mater., Vol. 37, (1994), pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    V.V. Hoof, L.V. den Abeele, A. Buekenhoudt, C. Dotremont and R. Leysen: “Economic comparison between azeotropic distillation and different hybrid systems combining distillation with pervaporation for the dehydration of isopropanol”, Sep. Purif. Technol., Vol. 37, (2004), pp. 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. Lipnizki, R.W. Field and Po-Kiong Ten: “Pervaporation-based hybrid process: a review of process design, application and economics”, J. Membrane Sci., Vol. 153, (1999), pp. 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. Wynn: “Pervaporation Comes of Age”, Chem. Eng. Prog., Vol. 97, (2001), pp. 66–72.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    U. Sander and P. Soukup: “Design and operation of a pervaporation plant for ethanol dehydration”, J. Membrane Sci., Vol. 36, (1988), pp. 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C.L. Hsueh, J.F. Kuo, Y.H. Huang, C.C. Wang and C.Y. Chen: “Separation of ethanol-water solution by poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrilyc acid) membranes”, Sep. Purif. Technol., Vol. 41, (2005), pp. 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Van Baelen, B. Van der Bruggen, K. Van den Dungen, J. Degreve and C. Vandecasteele: “Pervaporation of water-alcohol mixtures and acetic acid-water mixtures”, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 60, (2005), pp. 1583–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Koczka, J. Manczinger, P. Mizsey and Z. Fonyo: “Novel hybrid separation processes based on pervaporation for THF recovery”, Chem. Eng. Process, Vol 46, (2007), pp. 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.W. Baker: Membrane Technology and Applications, Membrane Technology and Research, 2nd ed., Wiley, England, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    O. Trifunović, F. Lipnizki and G. Trägardh: “The influence of process parameters on aroma recovery by hydrophobic pervaporation”, Desalination, Vol. 189, (2006), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M.-C. Belis-Bergouignan, V. Oltra and M.S. Jean: “Trajektories towards clean technology: example of volatile organic compound emission reductions”, Ecol. Econ., Vol. 48, (2004), pp. 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    I. Blume, J. G. Wijmans and R. W. Baker: “The Separation of Dissolved Organics from Water by Pervaporation”, J. Membrane. Sci., Vol. 49, (1990), pp. 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. L. Athayde, R. W. Baker, R. Daniels, M.H. Le and J.H. Ly: “Pervaporation for Wastewater Treatment”, Chemtech, Vol. 1, (1997), pp. 34–39.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    G. Cox and R.W. Baker: “Pervaporation for the Treatment of Small Volume VOC contaminated Waste Water Streams”, Industial Wastewater, Vol. 6, (1998), pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    B.V. der Bruggen, E. Curcio and E. Drioli: “Process intensification in the textile industry: the role of membrane technology”, J. Environ. Manage, Vol. 73, (2004), pp. 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Marriott and E. Sorensen: “The optimal design of membrane systems”, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 58, (2003), pp. 4991–5004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. Marriott and E. Sorensen: “A general approach to modeling membrane modules”, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 58, (2003), pp. 4975–4990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A.M. Eliceche, M.C. Daviou, P.M. Hoch and I.O. Uribe: “Optimization of azeotropic distillation columns combined with pervaporation membranes”, Comput. Chem. Eng., Vol. 26, (2002), pp. 563–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. D. Chapman, X. Tan, A.G. Livingston, K. Li and T. Oliveira: “Dehydration of tetrahydrofuran by pervaporation using composite membrane”, J. Membrane Sci., Vol. 268, (2006), pp. 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. Fahmy, D. Mewes and K. Ohlrogge: “Absorption-assisted pervaporation for solvent dehydration”, Desalination, Vol. 149, (2002), pp. 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. R. Shah, R.D. Noble and D.E. Clough: “Pervaporation-air stripping hybrid process for removal of VOCs from groundwater”, J. Membrane Sci., Vol. 241, (2004), pp. 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    R. Rautenbach, C. Herion and U. Meyer-Blumenroth: “Engineering aspects of pervaporation: calculation of transport resistances, module optimization and plant design in Pervaporation membrane separation processes”, edited by R.Y.M. Huang, Membrane Science and Technology Series, 1st ed, Elsevier, New York, 1991, pp. 181–224.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    P. Schaetzel, C. Vauclair, G. Luo and Q.T. Nguyen: “The solution-diffusion model order of magnitude calculation of coupling between the flux in pervaporation”, J. Membrane Sci., Vol 191, (2001), pp. 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    J.M. Neto and M.N. Pinho: “Mass transfer modeling for solvent dehydration by pervaporation”, Sep. Purif. Technol., Vol. 18, (2000), pp. 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    A. Lovasz, P. Mizsey and Z. Fonyo: “Methodology for parameter estimation of modelling of pervaporation in flowsheeting environment”, Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 133, (2007), pp. 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. Neel: “Introduction to pervaporation in Pervaporation membrane separation processes”, edited by R.Y.M. Huang, Membrane Science and Technology Series, 1 Elsevier, New York, 1991, pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    E. Nagy: “Binary, coupled mass transfer with variable diffusivity through cylindrical dense membrane”, J. Membrane Sci., Vol. 274, (2006), pp. 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    P. Mizsey, K. Koczka, A. Deak and Z. Fonyo: “Simulation of pervaporation with the “solution-diffusion” model”, Hungarian Chemical Journal, Vol. 60, (2005), pp. 239–242 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    R.D. Noble: Membrane Separation Technology, Principles and Applications, Membrane Science and Technology Series, 2nd ed., Elsevier, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Jonquieres, R. Clément, P. Lochon, J. Néel, M. Dresch and B. Chrétien: “Industrial state-of-the-art of pervaporation and vapour permeation in the western countries”, J. Membrane Sci., Vol 206, (2002), pp. 87–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    T.F. Edgar, D.M. Himmelblau and L.S. Lasdon: Optimization of Chemical Process, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2002.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    J.M. Douglas: Conceptual Design of Chemical Process, McGraw Hill Chemical Engineering Series, New York 1988.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Personal communications, Sulzer Chemtech 2004Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    E. Márki, B. Lenti, Gy. Vatai and E. Békássy-Molnár: “Clean technology for acetone absorption and recovery”, Sep. Purif. Technol., Vol 22–23, (2001), pp. 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Environmental Process Engineering, Research Group of Technical Chemistry, Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations