Advertisement

Central European Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 344–353 | Cite as

Statistical analysis of soil moisture content changes in Central Europe using GLDAS database over three past decades

  • Jarosław Zawadzki
  • Mateusz A. KȩdziorEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

This paper examine soil moisture trends changes in inhomogeneous area of Central European countries — Poland, the Czech Republic and neighbouring territories. The area suffered from the lack of large-scale soil parameters research. Most of them are limited to ground measurements performed for a small part of land. Although there were extensive water conditions studies performed for the whole Europe, such as drought analysis, they were focused on Western European countries, neglecting situation in Central Europe (taking exception to Austria). The NOAH model of Global Land Data Assimilation System database has been used as a data source. It delivers one degree spatial resolution data and variables which describe soil moisture values for four depth levels (0–10 cm, 10–40 cm, 40–100 cm and 100–200 cm). Data covering years 1979–2011 has been averaged in order to analyse summer and winter terms separately. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis have been prepared on the software Statistica, Research reveals that area is losing water content. Due to promising results of water content trend analysis, the authors plan to run a large-scale analysis using other variables from the GLDAS database, especially concerning soil temperature and evapotranspiration.

Keywords

Europe Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) regional studies soil moisture statistical analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Seneviratne S., Corti T., Davin E. et al., Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review, Earth-Science Reviews, 99, 2010, 125–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Klein Tank A. M. G., Können G. P., Trends in Indices of Daily Temperature and Precipitation Extremes in Europe, 1946–99, J. Climate, 16, 2003, 3665–3680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Veroustraete F., Patyn J., Myneni R. B., Forcing of a simple ecosystem model with fAPAR and climatic data to estimate regional scale photosynthetic assimilation, Academic Publishing, The Hague, the Netherlands, 151–177, 1994Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Gerten D., Heinke J., Hoff H., Global Water Availability and Requirements for Future Food Production, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12, 2011, 885–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Khodayar S., Kalthoff N., Schädler G., The impact of soil moisture variability on seasonal convective precipitation simulations via the soil-boundary layer interaction, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 14, 2012, EGU2012-8879Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ashok K., Mishra, Vijay P., Singh, Drought modelling — A review, Journal of Hydrology, 403, 2011, 157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ashok K. Mishra, Vijay P. Singh, A review of drought concepts, Journal of Hydrology, 391, 2010, 202–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Potop V., Mozny M., Soukup J., Drought evolution at various time scales in the lowland regions and their impact on vegetable crops in the Czech Republic, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 156, 2012, 121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hisdal H., Stahl K. et al., Have streamflow droughts in Europe become more severe or frequent?, International Journal of Climatology, 2001, 2004, 317–333Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Rodell M., Houser P. R., Jambor U. et al., The Global Land Data Assimilation System, American Meteorological Society, 85, 2004, 381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Somorowska U., Renewability of soil water storage in the Łasica catchment (Kampinos National Park), Water on protected areas, 2008, 255–264Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kerr Y., Waldteufel P., Richaume P. et al., The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm, Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50, 2012, 1384–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Usowicz J. B., Marczewski W. et al., The SWEX at the area of Eastern Poland: Comparison of soil moisture obtained from ground measurements and SMOS satellite data, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 14, 2012, EGU2012-9394-2Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    GrADS-DODS Server — User’s Guide, http://www.iges.org/grads/gds/doc/user.html, 2013
  15. [15]
    Explanations for the National Water Conditions, USGS (United States Geological Survey), http://water.usgs.gov/nwc/explain_data.html, 2011
  16. [16]
    The Python Language Reference, http://docs.python.org/2/reference, 2010
  17. [17]
    ArcInfo ASCII Grid format, http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ArcInfo+ASCII+Grid+format# ASCIIGrid, accessedJune, 2010
  18. [18]
    LDASLandSurfaceparameterswebpage, http://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/gldas/GLDASvegetation.php, 2013
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Zeng Z., Piao S., Lin X. et al., Global evapotranspiration over the past three decades: estimation based on the water balance equation combined with empirical models, Environmental ResearchLetters, 7, 2012, 014026Google Scholar
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Groundwater and Soil Moisture Conditions from GRACE Data Assimilation, http://drought.unl.edu/MonitoringTools/NASAGRACEDataAssimilation.aspx, 2013

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Engineering FacultyWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations