Central European Journal of Engineering

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 606–619 | Cite as

Envisioning engineering education and practice in the coming intelligence convergence era — a complex adaptive systems approach

  • Ahmed K. NoorEmail author
Vision Article


Some of the recent attempts for improving and transforming engineering education are reviewed. The attempts aim at providing the entry level engineers with the skills needed to address the challenges of future large-scale complex systems and projects. Some of the frontier sectors and future challenges for engineers are outlined. The major characteristics of the coming intelligence convergence era (the post-information age) are identified. These include the prevalence of smart devices and environments, the widespread applications of anticipatory computing and predictive / prescriptive analytics, as well as a symbiotic relationship between humans and machines. Devices and machines will be able to learn from, and with, humans in a natural collaborative way. The recent game changers in learnscapes (learning paradigms, technologies, platforms, spaces, and environments) that can significantly impact engineering education in the coming era are identified. Among these are open educational resources, knowledge-rich classrooms, immersive interactive 3D learning, augmented reality, reverse instruction / flipped classroom, gamification, robots in the classroom, and adaptive personalized learning. Significant transformative changes in, and mass customization of, learning are envisioned to emerge from the synergistic combination of the game changers and other technologies. The realization of the aforementioned vision requires the development of a new multidisciplinary framework of emergent engineering for relating innovation, complexity and cybernetics, within the future learning environments. The framework can be used to treat engineering education as a complex adaptive system, with dynamically interacting and communicating components (instructors, individual, small, and large groups of learners). The emergent behavior resulting from the interactions can produce progressively better, and continuously improving, learning environment. As a first step towards the realization of the vision, intelligent adaptive cyber-physical ecosystems need to be developed to facilitate collaboration between the various stakeholders of engineering education, and to accelerate the development of a skilled engineering workforce. The major components of the ecosystems include integrated knowledge discovery and exploitation facilities, blended learning and research spaces, novel ultra-intelligent software agents, multimodal and autonomous interfaces, and networked cognitive and tele-presence robots.


Anticipatory computing Augmented reality Complex adaptive system, Convergence Flipped classroom Game changers Immersive 3D learning Intelligence era Learnscapes Tele-presence robots 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material, approximately 1.79 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 2.06 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 4.57 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 6.08 MB.


  1. [1]
    National Academy of Engineering (NAE), The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Duderstadt, J.J., Engineering for a changing World: A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research, and education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2008Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Davison R.C. (Rapporteur), Engineering curricula: Understanding the design space and exploiting the opportunities, Summary of a workshop, National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Tryggvason G., Apelian D (editors), Shaping our world: Engineering education for the 21st century, John Wiley and sons, 2011.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Graham, R., Achieving Excellence in Engineering Education: the ingredients of a successful change, the Royal Academy of Engineering, London, UK, March 2012Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    American Society of Engineering Education, Innovation with Impact — Creating a Culture for Scholarly Innovation in Engineering Education, Report supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, June 2012Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Oblinger, D.G. (editor), Game Changers — Education and Information Technologies, ebook from EDUCAUSE, 2012. Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    De Campos L.C., Dirani E.A.T., Manrique A.L., Hattum-Janssen N. (editors), Project approaches to learning in engineering education: The practice of teamwork, Sense publishers, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 2012.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Noor A.K., Emerging interdisciplinary fields in the coming intelligence/convergence era, CEJE, 2(3), 2012, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Boult, T., Reddy, V.K., Dandapani, R., Stock, G.N., Polok, N., The Bachelor of Innovation Family of Degrees: Transforming Education in Engineering to Education in Innovation, in Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments, IEEE, 2010.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Infusing real world experiences into engineering education, National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC, 2012.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Sioshansi, F.P., Smart Grid: Integrating Renewable, distributed and Efficient Energy, Elsevier Inc., 2012Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Borlase, S. (editor), Smart Grids: Infrastructure, Technology, and Solutions, CRC Press, 2013Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Hill, T., Symmonds, G., The Smart Grid for Water: How Data Will save our water and our Utility, Advantage, Charleston, South Carolina, 2013Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Towards a Smart Mobility Roadmap 2014 — 2020, Report published by Automotive NL, 2012
  16. [16]
    Singh, S., New Mega Trends: Implications for our Future Lives, Palgrave Macmillan, UK, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Naphade, M., Banavar, G., Harrison, C., Paraszczak, J., Morris, R, Smarter Cities and their Innovation Challenges, IEEE Computer, 44(6), June 2011, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Zhao, Y.F., Xu, X., Enabling cognitive manufacturing through automated on-machine measurement planning and feedback, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24(3), 2010, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Lipson, H, Kurman, M., Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2013Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Mayer-Schonberger, V., Cukier, K., Big Data — A revolution that will transform how we Live, Work, and Think, An Eamon Dolan Book, Boston, 2013Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Siegel, E., Predictive Analytics — The Power to Predict who will Click, Buy, Lie, or Die, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2013Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Hof, R.D., Deep Learning, MIT Technology Review, 116(3), 2013, 32–36.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Human Computer Confluence, Report on the Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) Consultation Workshop held in Brussels on November 11, 2011, Information Society and Media group of the European Commission, February 2012.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    New Media Consortium and EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, The NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition, 2013. Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Zappa, M., Envisioning the future of Education Technology, An online Infographic presentation,
  26. [26]
    Marquis, J., Envisioning the future of Education Technology,
  27. [27]
    Jacobi, R., Jelgerhuis, H., van der Woert, N. (editors), Trend Report: Open Educational Resources 2013, Published by the Open Educational Resources Special Interest Group, March 2013, www.SURF.NL/TRENDREPORTOER2013 Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Mouza, C., Lavigne, N. (editors), Emerging Technologies for the Classroom — A learning Science Perspective, Springer, New York, 2013Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Cai, Y. (editor), 3D Immersive and Interactive Learning, Springer, Singapore, 2013Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Craig, A.B., Understanding Augmented Reality — Concepts and Applications, Morgan Kaufman / Elsevier, Waltham, MA, 2013.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Kapp, K.M., The Gamification of Learning and Instruction — Game Based Methods and strategies for Training and Education, John Wiley and Sons (co published with ASTD), 2012.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Bergmann, J., Sams, A., Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day, Iste, ASCD, 2013.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    McKenna A.F., Froyd J., Litzinger T. (Guest editors), The complexities of transforming engineering higher education, Special issue of the journal of engineering education, American society of engineering education, Washington DC, 2013Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Noor A.K., Training for the next wave, Mechanical Engineering, 134(3), 2012, 34–37.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Stephens R., Richey M., Accelerating STEM Capacity: Complex Adaptive System Perspective, Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 2011, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Madhaven, K., Johri, A., Xian, H., Jesiek, B.K., Wang, G.A., Vorvoreanu, M., Liu, X., Khandeparker, A., Wankat, P.C., Understanding the Engineering Education Research Problem Space Using Interactive Knowledge Networks and Topic Modeling Techniques, on line report

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advanced Engineering EnvironmentsOld Dominion UniversityHamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations