Central European Journal of Engineering

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 374–388 | Cite as

A review of thrust-vectoring in support of a V/STOL non-moving mechanical propulsion system

  • José C. Páscoa
  • Antonio Dumas
  • Michele Trancossi
  • Paul Stewart
  • Dean Vucinic
Review Article

Abstract

The advantages associated to Vertical Short-Take-Off and Landing (V/STOL) have been demonstrated since the early days of aviation, with the initial technolology being based on airships and later on helicopters and planes. Its operational advantages are enormous, being it in the field of military, humanitarian and rescue operations, or even in general aviation. Helicopters have limits in their maximum horizontal speed and classic V/STOL airplanes have problems associated with their large weight, due to the implementation of moving elements, when based on tilting rotors or turbojet vector mechanical oriented nozzles. A new alternative is proposed within the European Union Project ACHEON (Aerial Coanda High Efficiency Orienting-jet Nozzle). The project introduces a novel scheme to orient the jet that is free of moving elements. This is based on a Coanda effect nozzle supported in two fluid streams, also incorporating boundary layer plasma actuators to achieve larger deflection angles. Herein we introduce a state-of-the-art review of the concepts that have been proposed in the framework of jet orienting propulsion systems. This review allows to demonstrate the advantages of the new concept in comparison to competing technologies in use at present day, or of competing technologies under development worldwide.

Keywords

Coanda V/STOL Plasma actuator orienting nozzle propulsion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Trancossi M., Dumas A., Giuliani I., Bagi I., Ugello capace di deviare in modo dinamico e controllabile un getto sintetico senza parti meccaniche in movimento e suo sistema di controllo, Patent No. RE2011A000049, Italy, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Vucinic D., Hazarika B., Dinescu C., Visualization and PIV measurements of in-cylinder axisymmetric ows, in SAE Technical Papers, Automotive and Transportation Technology Congress and Exhibition, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Vucinic D., Hazarika B., Integrated approach to computational and experimental ow visualization of a double annular conned jet, Journal of Visualization, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 245–256, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Pascoa J., Xisto C., Goettlich E., Performance assessment limits in transonic 3D turbine stage blade rows using a mixing-plane approach, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 2035–2042, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Pascoa J., Mendes A., Gato L., A fast iterative inverse method for turbomachinery blade design, Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 630–637, 2009.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Pascoa J., Mendes A., Gato L., Redesigning annular turbine blade rows using a viscous-inviscid inverse design method, in Proc. 53rd ASME Turbo Expo 2008, vol. 6 of A, pp. 2209–2217, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Pascoa J., Mendes A., Gato L., Turbine blade duty re-design by controlling lean and sweep using an innovative iterative inverse design method, in Proc. 51st ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 6, pp. 1249–1256, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Pascoa J, Mendes A., Gato L., Aerodynamic design of turbomachinery cascades using an enhanced time-marching nite volume method,” CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 537–546, 2004.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Smith T., Bingham C., Stewart P., Allarton R. et al., Energy harvesting and power network architectures for the multibody advanced airship for transport high altitude cruiser-feeder airship concept, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Part G of Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 227, pp. 586–598, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Stewart P., Gladwin D., Parr M., Stewart J., Multiobjective evolutionary-fuzzy augmented flight control for an F16 aircraft,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Part G of Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 224, pp. 293–309, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Anderson S. B., Historical overview of V/STOL aircraft technology, Tech. Rep. TM-81280, NASA, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ilieva G., Pascoa J., Dumas A., Trancossi M., A critical review of propulsion concepts for modern airships, Central European Journal of Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 189–200, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Flight, pp. 289, April 1932Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Thomason T., Bell-Boeing JVX tilt rotor program — flight test program, in AIAA Paper N 83-2726, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Aviation international news, pp. 42, February 2012.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Flight international, pp. 1014, June 1962.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Aviation Week — Last Raptor Rolls Off Lockheed Martin Line, December 2011.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Dorr R., Rockwell/MBB X-31, World Air Power Journal, vol. 24, pp. 34–47, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Saeed B., Exploring the Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Blown Annular-Wing for V/STOL Aircraft. PhD thesis, Brunel University, 2010.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Saeed B., Gratton G., Mares C., A feasibility assessment of annular winged VTOL flight vehicles, The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 115, pp. 683–692, 2011.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    AGARD, V/STOL handling i-criteria and discussion, Tech. Rep. AGARD-R-577-70, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Moralez E., Merrick V., Schroeder J., Simulation evaluation of an advanced control concept for a V/STOL aircraft, Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 12, pp. 334–341, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Naldi R., Marconi L., Optimal transition maneuvers for a class of V/STOL aircraft, Automatica, vol. 47, pp. 870–879, 2011.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Strykowski P., Krothapalli A., An experimental investigation of active control of thrust vectoring nozzle flow fields, tech. rep., The University of Minnesota, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Mason M., Crowther W., Fluidic thrust vectoring of low observable aircraft, in CEAS Aerospace Aerodynamic Research Conference, pp. 1–7, 2002.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Wing D., Static investigation of two fluidic thrustvectoring concepts on a two-dimensional convergentdivergent nozzle, Tech. Rep. TM-4574, NASA Langley Research Center, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Porzio A., Characteristics of a Confined Jet Thrust Vector Control Nozzle. PhD thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology (USA), 1984.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Trancossi M., Dumas A., A.C.H.E.O.N.: Aerial Coanda High Efficiency Orienting-jet Nozzle, in SAE Aerotech 2011, no. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2737, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Trancossi M., An overview of scientific and technical literature on coanda effect applied to nozzles, in SAE Aerotech 2011, no. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2591, 2011.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Trancossi M., Dumas A., Coanda synthetic jet deflection apparatus and control, in SAE Aerotech 2011, no. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2590, 2011.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Sagha F., Banazadeh A., Coanda surface geometry optimization for multi-directional co-flow fluidic thrust vectoring, in Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea and Air, no. GT2009-59715, 2009.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    AGARD, Special course on V/STOL aerodynamics, Tech. Rep. AGARD-R-710, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, 1984.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Mabey K., Smith B., Whichard G., McKechnie T., Coanda-assisted spray manipulation collar for a commercial plasma spray gun,” Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 782–790, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Kim H., Rajesh G., Setoguchi T., Matsuo S., Optimization study of a coanda ejector, Journal of Thermal Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 331–336, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Vanierschot M., Persoons T., Van den Bulck E., A new method for annular jet control based on cross-flow injection, Physics of Fluids, vol. 21, pp. 025103-1–025103-9, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Patankar U., Sridhar K., Three-dimensional curved wall jets, Journal of Basic Engineering, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 339–344, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Bevilaqua P., Lee J., Development of a nozzle to improve the turning of supersonic Coanda jets, Tech. Rep. AFWAL-TR-80-3027, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base), 1980.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Favre-Marinet M., Binder G., Hac T., Generation of oscillating jets, Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 103, pp. 609–614, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Allen D., Axisymmetric Coanda-Assisted Vectoring. PhD thesis, Utah State University, 2008.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Neuendorf R., Lourenco L., Wygnanski I., On large stream-wise structures in a wall jet owing over a circular cylinder, Physics of Fluids, vol. 16, pp. 2158–2169, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Chiang T., Sheu T., Wang S., Side wall effects on the structure of laminar flow over a plane-symmetric sudden expansion, Computers & Fluids, vol. 29, pp. 467–492, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Nishino T., Hahn S., Shari K, Large-eddy simulations of a turbulent coanda jet on a circulation control airfoil, Physics of Fluids, vol. 22, pp. 125105-1–125105-15, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Dumitrache A., Frunzulica F., Ionescu T., Nonlinearity, Bifurcation and Chaos — Theory and Applications, ch. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Investigations on the Coanda Effect, pp. 101–132. INTECH, 2012.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Payne P., Curved jet ows (vol i), Tech. Rep. USAAML Technical Report 65-20, US Army Aviation Material Laboratories, Fort Eustis, Virginia, USA, 1965.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    AGARD, Effects of streamline curvature on turbulent flow, Tech. Rep. AGARDograph N169, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, 1973.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Kobayashi R., Fujisawa N., Curvature effects on twodimensional turbulent wall jets, Ingenieur-Archiv, vol. 53, pp. 409–417, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Englar R., Experimental investigation of the high velocity coanda wall jet applied to bluff trailing edge circulation control airfoils, tech. rep., Naval Ship Research and Development Center (USA), 1975.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Bevilaqua P., Lifting surface theory for thrust augmenting ejectors,” tech. rep., Rockwell International Columbus OH (USA), 1982.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Azim M., Sadrul-Islam M., Plane mixing layers from parallel of two streams, Experiments in Fluids, vol. 34, pp. 220–226, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Matsuo S., Setoguchi T., Kudo T, Study on the characteristics of supersonic Coanda jet, Journal of Thermal Science, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 165–175, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Alvi F., Strykowski P., Krothapalli A., Forliti D., Vectoring thrust in multiaxes using confined shear layers, Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Cattafesta L., Sheplak M., Actuators for active flow control, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 43, p. 247272, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Panzarella P., The use of a Coanda nozzle with parallel secondary injection for the thrust vectoring of a two-dimensional compressible fluid, Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology (USA), 1965.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Hanson R., Lavoie P., Naguib A., Morrison J., Transient growth instability cancellation by a plasma actuator array, Experiments in Fluids, vol. 49, pp. 1339–1348, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Corke T., Post M., Orlov D., Sdbd plasma enhanced aerodynamics: concepts, optimization and applications, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 43, p. 192217, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Sosaa R., Artana G., Steady control of laminar separation over airfoils with plasma sheet actuators, Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 64, pp. 604–610, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    Orlov D. M., Modeling and simulation of single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame, 2006.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Orlov D., Apker T., He, C. Othman H., et al., Modeling and experiment of leading edge separation control using sdbd plasma actuators, in AIAA 45th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2007.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Lemire S., Vo H., Reduction of fan and compressor wake defect using plasma actuation for tonal noise reduction, Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 133, pp. 133–143, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Grundmann S., Frey M., Tropea C., Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with plasma actuators for separation control, in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2009.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Thomas F., Kozlov A., Corke T., Plasma actuators for cylinder flow control and noise reduction, AIAA Journal, vol. 46, pp. 1921–1931, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Whalley R., Turbulent Boundary-Layer Control with DBD Plasma Actuators Using Spanwise Travelling-Wave Technique. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, 2011.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Tornabene F., Ceruti A., Mixed static and dynamic optimization of four-parameter functionally graded completely doubly curved and degenerate shells and panels using GDQ method, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 1, p. 33, 2013.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    Liverani A., Ceruti A., Caligiana G., Tablet-based 3D sketching and curve reverse modelling, Inter-national Journal of Computer Aided Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 2/3, pp. 188–215, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • José C. Páscoa
    • 1
  • Antonio Dumas
    • 2
  • Michele Trancossi
    • 2
  • Paul Stewart
    • 3
  • Dean Vucinic
    • 4
  1. 1.CAST-Center for Aerospace Science and Technology Dep. Electromechanical EngineeringUniversity of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze e Metodi dell’IngegneriaUniversità degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmiliaReggio-EmiliaItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Power and EnergyUniversity of LincolnBrayford Pool, LincolnUK
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations