Advertisement

Total prohibition of smoking but not partial restriction effectively reduced exposure to tobacco smoke among restaurant workers in Finland

  • Jere Reijula
  • Tom Johnsson
  • Simo Kaleva
  • Tapani Tuomi
  • Kari Reijula
Original Papers
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

To assess work-related exposure to tobacco smoke in Finnish restaurants, a series of nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted among restaurant workers and the levels of indoor air nicotine concentrations were measured in restaurants. The survey aimed to evaluate the impact of the smoke-free legislation in general and in particular after the total smoking ban launched in 2007.

Materials and Methods

In 2003–2010, four national questionnaire surveys were conducted among restaurant workers and the concentration of nicotine in indoor air was measured in different types of restaurants, bars and nightclubs.

Results

Between 2003 and 2010, the proportion of restaurant workers reporting occupational exposure to tobacco smoke dropped from 59% to 11%. Among pub workers, the decrease was from 97% to 18% and in workers of dining restaurants from 49% to 10%, respectively. The median concentration of nicotine in indoor air of all restaurants decreased from 11.7 μg/m3 to 0.1 μg/m3. The most significant decrease was detected in pubs where the decrease was from 16.1 μg/m3 to 0.1 μg/m3. Among all restaurant workers, in 2003–2010 the prevalence of daily smokers was reduced from 39% to 31% in men and from 35% to 25% in women.

Conclusion

Total prohibition of smoking but not partial restriction in restaurants was effective in reducing work-related exposure to tobacco smoke. Strict tobacco legislation may partly be associated with the significant decrease of daily smoking prevalence among restaurant workers.

Key words

Secondhand smoke Occupational exposure Prevention Restaurants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Janson C, Chinn S, Jarvis D, Zock JP, Torén K, Burney P. European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Effect of passive smoking on respiratory symptoms, bronchial responsiveness, lung function, and total serum IgE in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey: A cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2001;358(9299):2103–2109,  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07214-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Prüss-Ustün A. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: A retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):139–146,  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61388-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Human. VOLUME 83. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. Lyon: IARC; 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klonoff-Cohen HS, Edelstein SL, Lefkowitz ES, Srinivasan IP, Kaegi D, Chang JC, et al. The effect of passive smoking and tobacco exposure through breast milk on sudden infant death syndrome. JAMA. 1995;273(10):795–798, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520340051035.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Windham GC, Eaton A, Hopkins B. Evidence for an association between environmental tobacco smoke exposure and birthweight: a meta-analysis and new data. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999;13:35–57, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3016.1999.00150.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leonardi-Bee J, Smyth A, Britton J, Coleman T. Environmental tobacco smoke and fetal health: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93(5): F351–F361, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.133553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mons U, Nagelhout GE, Allwright S, Guignard R, van den Putte B, Willemsen MC, et al. Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys. Tob Control. 2013;22(e1):e2–e9. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levy DT, Benjakul S, Ross H, Ritthiphakdee B. The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths in a middle income nation: results from the Thailand SimSmoke simulation model. Tob Control. 2008;17(1):53–59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.022319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borland R, Yong HH, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G, et al. Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15Suppl 3:iii34–iii41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.008748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farrelly MC, Nonnemaker JM, Chou R, Hyland A, Peterson KK, Bauer UE. Changes in hospitality workers’ exposure to secondhand smoke following the implementation of New York’s smoke-free law. Tob Control. 2005;14(4): 236–241, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.008839.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    WHO FCTC. 2012 Global Progress Report on implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO Press, World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnsson T, Tuomi T, Hyvärinen M, Svinhufvud J, Rothberg M, Reijula K. Occupational exposure of non-smoking restaurant personnel to environmental tobacco smoke in Finland. Am J Ind Med. 2003;43(5):523–531, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reijula JP, Reijula KE. The impact of Finnish tobacco legislation on restaurant workers’ exposure to tobacco smoke at work. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(7):724–730, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494810379168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heloma A, Kähkönen E, Kaleva S, Reijula K. Smoking and exposure to tobacco smoke at medium-sized and large-scale workplaces. Am J Ind Med. 2000;37(2):214–220,  http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200002)37:2〈214::AID-AJIM7〉3.3.CO;2-Q.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnsson T, Tuomi T, Riuttala H, Hyvärinen M, Rothberg M, Reijula K. Environmental tobacco smoke in Finnish restaurants and bars before and after smoking restrictions were introduced. Ann Occup Hyg. 2006;50(4):331–341, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mel011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vainiotalo S, Väänänen V, Vaaranrinta R. Measurement of 16 volatile organic compounds in restaurant air contaminated with environmental tobacco smoke. Environ Res. 2008;108(3):280–288, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wipfli H, Avila-Tang E, Navas-Acien A, Kim S, Onicescu G, Yuan J, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure among women and children: evidence from 31 countries. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(4):672–679, http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rothberg M, Heloma A, Svinhufvud J, Kähkönen E, Reijula K. Measurement and analysis of nicotine and other VOCs in indoor air as an indicator of passive smoking. Ann Occup Hyg. 1998;42(2):129–134, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/42.2.129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Willemsen MC, Brug J, Uges DR, Vos de Wael ML. Validity and reliability of self-reported exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in work offices. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39(11):1111–1114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00043764-199711000-00012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gleich F, Mons U, Pötschke-Langer M. Air contamination due to smoking in German restaurants, bars, and other venues-before and after the implementation of a partial smoking ban. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(11):1155–1160, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr099.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Semple S, Creely KS, Naji A, Miller BG, Ayres JG. Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish pubs: The effect of smoke-free legislation. Tob Control 2007;16(2):127–132, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2006.018119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lightwood JM, Glantz SA. Declines in acute myocardial infarction after smoke-free laws and individual risk attributable to secondhand smoke. Circulation. 2009;120(14):1373–1379, http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.870691.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ayres JG, Semple S, MacCalman L, Dempsey S, Hilton S, Hurley JF, et al. Bar workers’ health and environmental tobacco smoke exposure(BHETSE): symptomatic improvement in bar staff following smoke-free legislation in Scotland. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(5):339–346, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.040311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fernández E, Fu M, Pascual JA, López MJ, Pérez-Ríos M, Schiaffino A, et al. Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to second-hand smoke and respiratory health in hospitality workers: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4244, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004244.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Menzies D, Nair A, Williamson PA, Schembri S, Al-Khairalla MZ, Barnes M, et al. Respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and markers of inflammation among bar workers before and after a legislative ban on smoking in public places. JAMA. 2006;296(14):1742–1748, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.14.1742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Skogstad M, Kjaerheim K, Fladseth G, Gjølstad M, Daae HL, Olsen R, et al. Cross shift changes in lung function among bar and restaurant workers before and after implementation of a smoking ban. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(7):482–487, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.024638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reijula JP, Johnsson TS, Kaleva PS, Reijula KE. Exposure to tobacco smoke and prevalence of symptoms decreased among Finnish restaurant workers after the smoke-free law. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(1):37–43, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajim.21006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Edwards R, Thomson G, Wilson N, Waa A, Bullen C, O’Dea D, et al. After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand. Tob Control. 2008;17(1):e2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.020347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jere Reijula
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tom Johnsson
    • 1
  • Simo Kaleva
    • 1
  • Tapani Tuomi
    • 1
  • Kari Reijula
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Hjelt InstituteUniversity of Helsinki, Department of Public HealthHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations