Total prohibition of smoking but not partial restriction effectively reduced exposure to tobacco smoke among restaurant workers in Finland
- 82 Downloads
To assess work-related exposure to tobacco smoke in Finnish restaurants, a series of nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted among restaurant workers and the levels of indoor air nicotine concentrations were measured in restaurants. The survey aimed to evaluate the impact of the smoke-free legislation in general and in particular after the total smoking ban launched in 2007.
Materials and Methods
In 2003–2010, four national questionnaire surveys were conducted among restaurant workers and the concentration of nicotine in indoor air was measured in different types of restaurants, bars and nightclubs.
Between 2003 and 2010, the proportion of restaurant workers reporting occupational exposure to tobacco smoke dropped from 59% to 11%. Among pub workers, the decrease was from 97% to 18% and in workers of dining restaurants from 49% to 10%, respectively. The median concentration of nicotine in indoor air of all restaurants decreased from 11.7 μg/m3 to 0.1 μg/m3. The most significant decrease was detected in pubs where the decrease was from 16.1 μg/m3 to 0.1 μg/m3. Among all restaurant workers, in 2003–2010 the prevalence of daily smokers was reduced from 39% to 31% in men and from 35% to 25% in women.
Total prohibition of smoking but not partial restriction in restaurants was effective in reducing work-related exposure to tobacco smoke. Strict tobacco legislation may partly be associated with the significant decrease of daily smoking prevalence among restaurant workers.
Key wordsSecondhand smoke Occupational exposure Prevention Restaurants
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Janson C, Chinn S, Jarvis D, Zock JP, Torén K, Burney P. European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Effect of passive smoking on respiratory symptoms, bronchial responsiveness, lung function, and total serum IgE in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey: A cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2001;358(9299):2103–2109, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07214-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Human. VOLUME 83. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. Lyon: IARC; 2004.Google Scholar
- 4.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.Google Scholar
- 5.Klonoff-Cohen HS, Edelstein SL, Lefkowitz ES, Srinivasan IP, Kaegi D, Chang JC, et al. The effect of passive smoking and tobacco exposure through breast milk on sudden infant death syndrome. JAMA. 1995;273(10):795–798, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520340051035.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Windham GC, Eaton A, Hopkins B. Evidence for an association between environmental tobacco smoke exposure and birthweight: a meta-analysis and new data. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999;13:35–57, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3016.1999.00150.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Mons U, Nagelhout GE, Allwright S, Guignard R, van den Putte B, Willemsen MC, et al. Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys. Tob Control. 2013;22(e1):e2–e9. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Borland R, Yong HH, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G, et al. Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15Suppl 3:iii34–iii41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.008748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.WHO FCTC. 2012 Global Progress Report on implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO Press, World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar
- 15.Heloma A, Kähkönen E, Kaleva S, Reijula K. Smoking and exposure to tobacco smoke at medium-sized and large-scale workplaces. Am J Ind Med. 2000;37(2):214–220, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200002)37:2〈214::AID-AJIM7〉3.3.CO;2-Q.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Willemsen MC, Brug J, Uges DR, Vos de Wael ML. Validity and reliability of self-reported exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in work offices. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39(11):1111–1114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00043764-199711000-00012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lightwood JM, Glantz SA. Declines in acute myocardial infarction after smoke-free laws and individual risk attributable to secondhand smoke. Circulation. 2009;120(14):1373–1379, http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.870691.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ayres JG, Semple S, MacCalman L, Dempsey S, Hilton S, Hurley JF, et al. Bar workers’ health and environmental tobacco smoke exposure(BHETSE): symptomatic improvement in bar staff following smoke-free legislation in Scotland. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(5):339–346, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.040311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Fernández E, Fu M, Pascual JA, López MJ, Pérez-Ríos M, Schiaffino A, et al. Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to second-hand smoke and respiratory health in hospitality workers: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4244, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004244.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Menzies D, Nair A, Williamson PA, Schembri S, Al-Khairalla MZ, Barnes M, et al. Respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and markers of inflammation among bar workers before and after a legislative ban on smoking in public places. JAMA. 2006;296(14):1742–1748, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.14.1742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Skogstad M, Kjaerheim K, Fladseth G, Gjølstad M, Daae HL, Olsen R, et al. Cross shift changes in lung function among bar and restaurant workers before and after implementation of a smoking ban. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(7):482–487, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.024638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar