Advertisement

Human Affairs

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 148–159 | Cite as

Political science approaches to integrity and corruption

  • Jonathan Rose
  • Paul M. HeywoodEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Integrity ought logically to be a particularly important concept within political science. If those acting within the political system do not have integrity, our ability to trust them, to have confidence in their actions, and perhaps even to consider them legitimate can be challenged. Indeed, the very concept of integrity goes some way towards underwriting positive views of political actors. Yet, despite this importance, political science as a discipline has perhaps focused too little on questions of integrity. Where political science has looked at the subject of integrity, it has often done so without using the specific linguistic formulation “integrity”. Most commonly, the focus has instead been on “corruption”—a strand of research which has produced results that cannot always be translated into discussions of integrity, by virtue of its narrower focus upon the “negative pole” of public ethics. Other measures, such as “Quality of Government”, focus on positive attributes, notably impartiality, but this also fails fully to capture the notion of integrity: dishonesty can be impartial. Specific formal “codes” used within public life and among political practitioners can be much more nuanced than the most widely used measures, and can be much closer to what we understand—academically—as “integrity”. This paper argues that the hard conceptual and empirical work of elaborating integrity into a fully operationalizable concept offers the potential reward of an analytical concept that is more closely aligned with political reality.

Key words

integrity corruption public ethics politics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anechiarico, F., Jacobs, J. (1996). The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, S., Heywood, P. M. (2009). The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International’s Approach to Measuring Corruption. Political Studies 57, 746–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks, R.C. (1970). The Nature of Political Corruption. In A. Heidenheimer (Ed.). Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis, pp. 56–64. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Civil Service Code (2010). Civil Service Code. [available online: http://resources.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/civil-service-code-2010.pdf] (last accessed 25/7/2012)
  5. Collins, P. (2012). Introduction to the Special Issue: The Global Anti-Corruption Discourse-Towards Integrity Management. Public Administration and Development 32, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. della Porta, D., Vannucci, A. (2007). Corruption and Anti-corruption: The Political Defeat of “Clean Hands” in Italy. West European Politics 30, 830–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. van der Eijk, C., Franklin, M. (2009). Elections and Voters. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  10. Evrenk, H. (2011). Why a Clean Politician Supports Dirty Politics: A Game-Theoretical Explanation for the Persistence of Political Corruption. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 80, 498–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. French, R. D. (2012). The Professors on Public Life. The Political Quarterly 83, 532–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Global Integrity (2012a). The Global Integrity Report: Methodology [available online: http://www.globalintegrity.org/report/methodology] (last accessed 25/7/2012)
  13. Global Integrity (2012b). Global Integrity Report: 2011. Executive Summary [available online: http://www.globalintegrity.org/files/GIR2011.pdf] (last accessed 25/7/2012]
  14. Grasso, M. (2011). The Research Advisory Board of the Committee on Standards in Public Life; Rose, J. Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life 2010. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life.Google Scholar
  15. Hardin, R. (1999). Do We Want Trust in Government? In M. E. Warren (Ed.). Democracy and Trust, pp. 22–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawken, A., Munck, G. (2009). Do You Know Your Data? Measurement Validity in Corruption Research. Working Paper, School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University.Google Scholar
  17. Hayward, B. Mortimer, E., Brunwin, T. (2004). Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life 2004. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life.Google Scholar
  18. Hayward, B., Brunwin, T., Bassett, C., Elston, D., Lambert, H. (2008). Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life 2008. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life.Google Scholar
  19. Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The Political Relevance of Political Trust. American Political Science Review 92, 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heywood, P.M. (2012). Integrity Management and the Public Service Ethos in the UK: Patchwork Quilt or Threadbare Blanket? International Review of Administrative Sciences 78, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kenny, C. (2009). Measuring Corruption in Infrastructure: Evidence from Transition and Developing Countries. Journal of Development Studies 45, 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ipsos-MORI (2006). Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life 2006. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life.Google Scholar
  23. Klingemann, H-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I., McDonald, M. (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Knack S. 2006. Measuring Corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia A Critique of the Cross-Country Indicators. World Bank Working Paper 3968 Google Scholar
  25. Langbein, L., Knack, S. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Six, One, or None? Journal of Development Studies 46, 350–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levi, M., Stoker, L. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3, 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, A. H. (1974). Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review 68, 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lord Nolan (1995). Standards in Public Life: First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. Cmnd. 2850-51. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  29. Olken, B. (2009). Corruption Perceptions vs. Corruption Reality. Journal of Public Economics 93, 950–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Philp, M. (2006). Corruption Definition and Measurement. In C. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, F. Gatlung. Measuring Corruption, pp.45–79. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rothstein, B. (2011). The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rothstein, B., Eek, D. (2009). Political Corruption and Social Trust: An Experimental Approach. Rationality and Society 21, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rothstein, B., Teorell, J. (2008). What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 21, 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, I., Leung, J. (2012). Integrity Management in Post-1997 Hong Kong: Challenges for a Rule-Based System. Crime, Law and Social Change 58, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stimson, J. (1999). Public Opinion in America. Oxford: Westview.Google Scholar
  37. Transparency International [TI] (2011). National Integrity Systems Assessment: United Kingdom [available online: http://www.transparency.org.uk/our-work/publications/93-corruption-in-the-uk-part-three-nis-study] (last accessed 25/7/2012)
  38. Transparency International [TI] (2012) What is the Corruption Perceptions Index [available online: http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2011/in_detail/] (last accessed 25/7/2012)
  39. UNDP (2008). A Users’ Guide to Measuring Corruption. United Nations Development Program. UNDP Oslo Governance Centre.Google Scholar
  40. Weatherford, M. S. (1992). Measuring Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 86, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Webb, W. (2012). Ethical Culture and the Values-Based Approach to Integrity Management: A Case Study of the Department of Correctional Services. Public Administration and Development 32, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics and International Relations University ParkUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations