Human Affairs

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 122–130 | Cite as

Commodifying diversity: Education and governance in the era of neoliberalism

  • Andrew Wilkins
Research Article


In this paper I explore the pedagogical and political shift marked by the meaning and practice of diversity offered through New Labour education policy texts, specifically, the policy and practice of personalized learning (or personalization). The aim of this paper is to map the ways in which diversity relays and mobilizes a set of neoliberal positions and relationships in the field of education and seeks to govern education institutions and education users through politically circulating norms and values. These norms and values, I want to argue, echo and redeem the kinds of frameworks, applications and rationalities typically aligned with modes of neoliberal or advanced liberal governance, e.g. marketization, monetarization, atomization and deregulation. I conclude the paper by considering how diversity in education renders problematic conventional antinomies of the citizen and consumer, public and private, state and civil society, etc., and forces us to confront the rhizomatic character of contemporary governance and education in the era of neoliberalism.


neoliberalism diversity consumerism personalized learning pedagogy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ball, S. J. (2008). The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, J., Newman, J. (1997). The Managerial State. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Department of Education and Science (DES) (1988). Education Reform Act. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  4. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) (2001). Schools Building on Success. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  5. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2004). Five Year Strategy for Children and Learners. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2005). Higher Standards, Better Schools for All. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  7. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2006). 2020 Vision. Report of the Teaching and Learning in 2020 Review Group. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy. Studies in Political Economy 40, 7–39.Google Scholar
  10. Johansson, H., Hvinden, B. (2005). Welfare Governance and the Remaking of Citizenship. In J. Newman (Ed.). Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. University of Bristol, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, K. (2003). Education in Britain: 1944 to the Present. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Leadbeater, C. (2004). Participation through Personalisation. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  13. Leadbeater, C. (2006). The Future of Public Services: Personalised Learning. In OECD Schooling for Tomorrow. Personalised Education. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Miliband, D. (2006). Choice and Voice in Personalised Learning. In OECD Schooling for Tomorrow. Personalised Education. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Modood, T. (2010). Still Not Easy Being British: Struggles for a Multicultural Citizenship. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  16. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilkins, A. (2012a). The Spectre of Neoliberalism: Pedagogy, Gender and the Construction of Learner Identities. Critical Studies in Education. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  18. Wilkins, A. (2012b). Push and Pull in the Classroom: Gender, Competition and the Neoliberal Subject. Gender and Education. Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationRoehampton UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations