Design and pilot study of a Gait Enhancing Mobile Shoe
Hemiparesis is a frequent and disabling consequence of stroke and can lead to asymmetric and ineffcient walking patterns. Training on a split-belt treadmill, which has two separate treads driving each leg at a different speed, can correct such asymmetries post-stroke. However, the effects of split-belt treadmill training only partially transfer to everyday walking over ground and extended training sessions are required to achieve long-lasting effects. Our aim is to develop an alternative device, the Gait Enhancing Mobile Shoe (GEMS), that mimics the actions of the split-belt treadmill, but can be used during over-ground walking and in one’s own home, thus enabling long-term training. The GEMS does not require any external power and is completely passive; all necessary forces are redirected from the natural forces present during walking. Three healthy subjects walked on the shoes for twenty minutes during which one GEMS generated a backward motion and the other GEMS generated a forward motion. Our preliminary experiments suggest that wearing the GEMS did cause subjects to modify coordination between the legs and these changes persisted when subjects returned to normal over-ground walking. The largest effects were observed in measures of temporal coordination (e.g., duration of double-support). These results suggest that the GEMS is capable of altering overground walking coordination in healthy controls and could potentially be used to correct gait asymmetries post-stroke.
Keywordslocomotion hemiparesis rehabilitation shoe asymmetric gait adaptation learning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- M. E. Brandstater, H. de Bruin, C. Gowland, and B. M. Clark, Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 64, (1983), 583–587Google Scholar
- A. de Groot, R. Decker, and K. B. Reed, Gait enhancing mobile shoe (GEMS) for rehabilitation, in Proc. Joint Eurohaptics Conf. and Symp. on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, March 2009, 190–195Google Scholar
- I. Handzic, E. Vasudevan, and K. B. Reed, Motion Controlled Gait Enhancing Mobile Shoe for Rehabilitation, Proc. of the 12th Intl. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), (2011), 583–587Google Scholar
- F. M. Ivey, R. F. Macko, A. S. Ryan, and C. E. Hafer-Macko, Cardiovascular health and fitness after stroke, Top Stroke Rehabil. 12, (2005), 1–16Google Scholar
- C. Honeycutt, J. Sushko, and K. B. Reed, Asymmetric passive dynamic walker, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics, (2011), 852–857Google Scholar
- S. J. Olney, M. P. Griffn, and I. D. McBride, Temporal, kinematic, and kinetic variables related to gait speed in subjects with hemiplegia: a regression approach, Phys. Ther. 74, (1994), 872–885Google Scholar
- J. Perry, Gait Analysis: Normal and pathological function, N. S. Inc., Ed. Thorofare, vol. 50, 1992Google Scholar
- D. Reisman, R. Wityk, and A. Bastian, Split-belt treadmill walking adaptation in post-stroke hemiparesis, J. Neurologic Physical Therapy, vol. 29, (2005), p. 196Google Scholar
- D. S. Reisman, H. McLean, and A. J. Bastian, Split-belt treadmill training poststroke: a case study, J. Neurol. Phys. Ther., 34, (2010), 202–207Google Scholar
- R. Shadmehr, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task, J. Neurosci., 14, (1994), 3208–3224Google Scholar
- N. E. Spear, Retrieval of memory in animals. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1978Google Scholar
- E. B. Titianova, and I. M. Tarkka, Asymmetry in walking performance and postural sway in patients with chronic unilateral cerebral infarction, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 32, (1995), 236–244Google Scholar