Advertisement

Biologia

pp 1–4 | Cite as

Application of the alizarin red S mass marking technique and its detection in stocked asp (Leuciscus aspius)

  • Karel Halačka
  • Jan Mareš
  • Lukáš Vetešník
  • Petr BlabolilEmail author
Short Communication
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Alizarin Red S marking and detection was tested on asp (Leuciscus aspius Linnaeus, 1758) in an experimental pool followed by a mark-recapture experiment in the field. Placing the asp in a 0.15 g L−1 solution for one hour produced marks that were detectable for at least one year. In order to detect the fluorescent marks, novel equipment was developed comprising a battery-powered laser source (<100 mW laser pointer, wavelength 532 nm) and protective filtration goggles (filtering wavelength 190–540 nm). The detection equipment and procedure proved satisfactory for marking large numbers of fish and for detection in the field. It allowed repeat observations of the same fish and examination of fin rays (eventually fin clips), which are usually too large to examine under a standard microscope. This method is highly recommended for future studies.

Keywords

Aspius aspius Fin rays Fluorescence Green laser Non-invasive detection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported through project QJ1620240 “Application of “top-down” biomanipulation to reduce eutrophication caused by agriculture in reservoirs“. Thanks are given to Dr. Kevin Roche for language correction.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Bangs BL, Falcy MR, Scheerer PD, Clements S (2013) Comparison of three methods for marking a small floodplain minnow. Anim Biotechnol 1:18.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-3385-1-18 Google Scholar
  2. Bashey F (2004) A comparison of the suitability of alizarin red s and calcein for inducing a nonlethally detectable mark in juvenile guppies. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:1516–1523.  https://doi.org/10.1577/T03-073.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bien HS, Stawitz J, Wunderlich K (2000) Anthraquinone dyes and intermediates. In: Gogin L, Zhizhina E (eds) Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a02_355 Google Scholar
  4. Blabolil P, Ricard D, Peterka J, Říha M, Jůza T, Vašek M, Prchalová M, Čech M, Muška M, Seďa J, Mrkvička T, Boukal DS, Kubečka J (2016) Predicting asp and pikeperch recruitment in a riverine reservoir. Fish Res 173:45–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blabolil P, Frouzová J, Matěna J, Peterka J (2018) Immersion mass marking of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae in oxytetracycline hydrochloride and its detection using fluorescence microscopy. Biologia 73:531–535.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-0057-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckmann R (2003) Alizarin marking of whitefish, Coregonus lavaretus otoliths during egg incubation. Fish Manag Ecol 10:233–239.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00345.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fielder DG (2002) Methodology for immersion marking walleye fry and fingerlings in oxytetracycline hydrochloride and its detection with fluorescence microscopy. Fish Tech Rep 2002-01 Michigan Dept of Natural Resources, Fisheries DivisionGoogle Scholar
  8. Ibáñez AL, Rodríguez-Canto A, Cortés-Martínez J, García-Calderón JL (2013) Evaluation of marking efficiency of different alizarin red S concentrations on body fish structures in Oreochromis niloticus (Perciformes: Cichlidae) juveniles. Rev Biol Trop 61:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leips J, Baril CT, Rood FH, Reznick DN, Bashey F (2001) The suitability of calcein to mark poeciliid fish and a new method of detection. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:501–207.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<0501:TSOCTM>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu Q, Zhanga XM, Zhanga PD, Nwafili SA (2009) The use of alizarin red S and alizarin complexone for immersion marking Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus (T.). Fish Res 98:67–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lü HJ, Fu M, Xi D, Yao WZ, Su SQ, Wu ZL (2015a) Experimental evaluation of using calcein and alizarin red S for immersion marking of bighead carp Aristichthys nobilis (Richardson, 1845) to assess growth and identification of marks in otoliths, scales and fin rays. J Appl Ichthyol 31:665–674.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lü HJ, Chen H, Fu M, Peng X, Xi D, Zhang Z (2015b) Experimental evaluation of calcein and alizarin red S for immersion marking grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idellus. Fish Sci 81:653–662.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-015-0884-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lü HJ, Fu M, Dai S, Xi D, Zhang ZX (2016) Experimental evaluation of calcein and alizarin red S for immersion marking of silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844). J Appl Ichthyol 32:83–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martyniak A, Stańczak K, Kozłowski J, Mierzejewska K, Wziątek B, Lejk AM, Hliwa P (2013) Alizarin mark retention in the otoliths of whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus f. lavaretus L.) from Lake Łebsko, Poland. Advanc Limnol 64:83–89.  https://doi.org/10.1127/1612-166X/2013/0064-0009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mortensen A, Hansen OJ, Puvanendran V (2016) Evaluation of three external marking methods of farmed Atlantic salmon for the future use of differentiating it from wild Atlantic salmon. J Aquacult Res Develop 7:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.100051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielsen LA (1992) Methods of marking fish and shellfish, Special publication. American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  17. Reed JR, Staples DF (2017) Evaluation of two different stocking rates of small walleye fingerlings in Minnesota Lakes. North Am J Fish Manag 37:1243–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2017.1365784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rutherford ES, Iacono JD, Callaham G (2002) Evaluation of marking procedures to estimate natural reproduction of Chinook salmon in Lake Michigan. Great Lakes Fishery Cimmission, Project Completion ReportGoogle Scholar
  19. Skalski JR, Buchanan RA, Griswold J (2009) Review of marking methods and release-recapture designs for estimating the survival of very small fish: examples from the assessment of salmonid fry survival. Rev Fish Sci 17:391–401.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260902752199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Skov C, Gronkjaer P, Nielse C (2001) Marking pike fry otoliths with alizarin complexone and strontium: an evaluation of methods. J Fish Biol 59:745–750.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb02377.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Skov C, Koed A, Baastrup-Spohr L, Arlinghaus R (2011) Dispersal, growth, and diet of stocked and wild northern pike fry in a shallow natural lake, with implications for the management of stocking programs. North Am J Fish Manag 31:1177–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2011.646452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stanczak K, Krejszeff S, Debowska M, Mierzejewska K, Wozniak M, Hliwa P (2015) Mass marking of Leuciscus idus larvae using Artemia salina as a vector of fluorescent dyes. J Fish Biol 87:799–804.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ward DL (2003) Effects of marking techniques and handling on swimming ability of bonytail chub. J Ariz Nev Acad Sci 36(1):34–36Google Scholar
  24. Zorn TG (2015) Contribution of hatchery-reared walleyes to populations in northern Green Bay, Lake Michigan. N Am J Aquacult 77:409–422.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15222055.2015.1044056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karel Halačka
    • 1
  • Jan Mareš
    • 2
  • Lukáš Vetešník
    • 1
  • Petr Blabolil
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Vertebrate Biology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Fisheries and HydrobiologyMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.Institute of HydrobiologyBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of SciencesČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations