Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 74, Issue 6, pp 631–638 | Cite as

Antioxidant enzyme activity in Pinus mugo Turra, P. sylvestris L. and in their putative hybrids

  • Andrej KormuťákEmail author
  • Martin Galgóci
  • Peter Boleček
  • Dušan Gömöry
Original Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Specific activity dynamics and isozyme composition of antioxidant enzymes ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were followed during the vegetation period in the young needles of Pinus mugo Turra, P. sylvestris L. and their putative hybrids. Tested enzymes differed in their dynamics showing the highest APX and CAT activities in the spring and autumn and the highest SOD activity in summer. The outlined course of enzyme activity was characteristic for all the three taxa compared. The level of specific enzyme activities was relatively constant in investigated taxa reaching statistical significance in some months of the scored period only. The same was true of the antioxidant enzyme activities of P. mugo individuals growing at different altitudes. Of the enzymes assayed, catalase was the most active. Hybrid individuals exhibited prevailingly intermediate level of their enzyme activity compared to the parental species. The dynamics of SOD correlated with intensity of UV irradiation during vegetation period. Partial correlation was observed between specific enzyme activities and isozyme composition.

Keywords

Pinus sylvestris P. mugo Hybrids Antioxidant enzymes Activity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the VEGA Grant Agency of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, project no.2/0063/. The authors are obliged to the staff of Hydrometeorological Station in Ganovce near Poprad for the data on UV irradiation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alscher RG, Erturk N, Heath LS (2002) Role of superoxide dismutase (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J Exp Bot 53:1331–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JV, Chevone BI, Hess JL (1992) Seasonal variation in the antioxidant system of eastern white pine needles. Plant Physiol 98:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauchamp C, Fridowich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 44:276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benes SE, Murphy TM, Anderson PD, Houpis JLJ (1995) Relationship of antioxidant enzymes to ozone tolerance in branches of mature ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees exposed to long-term, low concentration, ozone fumigation and acid precipitation. Physiol Plant.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00793.x
  5. Bogdanović J, Milosavić N, Prodanović R, Dučić T, Radotić K (2007) Variability of antioxidant enzyme activity and isoenzyme profile in needles of Serbian spruce (Picea omorika (Panč.) Purkinye). Biochem Syst Ecol 35:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Annal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao D, Gao Q, Xu HY, Ma F, Zhao CM, Liu JQ (2009) Physiological responses to gradual drought stress in the diploid hybrid Pinus densata and its two parental species. Trees 23:717–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaspar T, Franek T, Bisbis B, Kevers C, Jouve L, Hausman JF, Dommes J (2002) Concepts in plant stress physiology. Application to plant tissue cultures. Plant Growth Regul 37:263–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo J, Wang G, Yang L, Sun X (2010) Ecological responses of Abies fabri seedlings to drought stress and nitrogen supply. Physiol Plant 139:335–347Google Scholar
  10. Harris WN, Dalton DA (1997) Seasonal variation in glutathione reductase activity in coastal and montane populations of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta). Northwest Science 71:205–213Google Scholar
  11. Jafarnia S, Akbarinia M, Hosseinpour B, Modares Sanavi SAM, Salami SA (2018) Effect of drought stress on some growth, morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of two different populations of Quercus brantii. iForest 11:212–220.  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2496-010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kendal EJ, McKersie BD (1989) Free radical and freezing injury to cell membranes of winter wheat. Physiol Plant 139:335–347Google Scholar
  13. Knőraer OC, Durner J, Bőger P (1996) Alterations in the antioxidative system of suspension-cultured soybean cells (Glycine max) induced by oxidative stress. Physiol Plant 97:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu C, Liu Y, Guo K, Fan D, Li G, Zheng Y, Yu L, Yang R (2011) Effect of drought on pigments, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzymes in six woody plant species in karst habitats of southwestern China. Environ Exp Bot 71:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu P, Sang WG, Ma KP (2008) Differential responses of the activities of antioxidant enzymes to thermal stresses between two invasive Eupatorium species in China. J Integr Plant Biol 50:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marron N, Maury S, Rinaldi C, Brignolas F (2006) Impact of drought anf leaf development stage on enzymatic antioxidant system of two Populus deltoides × nigra clones. Ann. For. Sci., springer Verlag/EDP. Sciences 63:323–327Google Scholar
  17. Miljutina IL, Sudachkova NE, Romanova LI (2012) Activity of the antioxidant system in coniferous stands of different density. Lesovedenije [Forest Science] 3:69–76 [In Russian]Google Scholar
  18. Nakano Y, Asada K (1981) Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 22:867–880Google Scholar
  19. Polle A, Krings B, Rennenberg H (1989) Superoxide dismutase activity in needles of Norwegian spruce trees (Picea abies L.). Plant Physiol 90:1310–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 537 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sánches-Diaz M, Tapia C, Antolín MC (2007) Drought-induced oxidative stress in Canarian laurel forest tree species growing under controlled conditions. Tree Physiol 27:1415–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SAS (2010) SAS STAT User′sGuide.http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/91pdf/sasdoc_91/stat_ug_7313.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2010
  23. Schwanz P, Polle A (2001) Differential stress responses of antioxidative systems to drought in pendunculate oak (Quercus robur) and maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) grown under high CO2 concentrations. J Exp Bot 52:133–143Google Scholar
  24. Skwarek M, Patykowski J, Witczak A (2017) Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities in Pinus sylvestris and Larix decidua seedlings after Melolontha melolonthaattack. For Res Pap 78:159–164Google Scholar
  25. Talbi S, Romero-Puertas MC, Hernándes A, Terrón L, Ferchichi A, Sandalio LM (2015) Drought tolerance in a Saharian plant Oudneya africana: role of antioxidant defences. Environ Exp Bot 111:114–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tandy NE, Di Giulio RT, Richardson CJ (1989) Assay and electrophoresis of superoxide dismutase from red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.), and scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Physiol 90:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tausz M, Stabentheiner E, Wonisch A, Grill D (1998) Classification of biochemical response patterns for the assessment of environmental stress to Norway spruce. Environ Sci Pollut Res, Spec. Issue No 1:96–100Google Scholar
  28. Wang XR, Szmidt AE, Lewandowski A, Wang ZR (1990) Evolutionary analysis of Pinus densata masters, a putative tertiary habrid. Theor Appl Genet 80:635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. War AR, Paulraj MG, Ahmad T, Buhroo AA, Hussain B, Ignacimuthu S, Sharma HC (2012) Mechanisms of plant defence against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behav 7:1306–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zolfaghari R, Hosseini SM, Korori SA (2010) Relationship between peroxidase and catalase with metabolism and environmental factors in beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) in three different altitudes. Int J Environ Sci 1:243–252Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrej Kormuťák
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Galgóci
    • 1
  • Peter Boleček
    • 2
  • Dušan Gömöry
    • 3
  1. 1.Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Institute of Plant Genetics and BiotechnologySlovak Academy of SciencesNitraSlovak Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Natural SciencesConstantine Philosopher UniversityNitraSlovak Republic
  3. 3.Faculty of ForestryTechnical University in ZvolenZvolenSlovak Republic

Personalised recommendations