Influence of auxins on somatic embryogenesis in Haworthia retusa Duval
An efficient in vitro plant regeneration method through somatic embryogenesis has been established in Haworthia retusa. Somatic embryos were induced from leaf explants on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with different concentrations of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), and α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) either alone or in combination with 4 μM thidiazuron (TDZ). Of the four auxins studied, IBA was found to be the most promising in terms of somatic embryo induction, followed in decreasing frequency by 2,4-D, IAA, and NAA. The highest somatic embryo induction (60.7%), with a mean of 20.7 embryos per leaf explant, was observed on MS medium amended with 20 μM IBA. The inclusion of 4 μM TDZ to the auxin-containing medium significantly (p < 0.0001) increased the somatic embryo induction frequency as well as the number of somatic embryos. The best combination for somatic embryogenesis was IBA + TDZ. The highest incidence of somatic embryo induction (100%), with a mean of 55.8 somatic embryos, was obtained on a culture medium containing 16 μM IBA + 4 μM TDZ. Somatic embryos germinated best on MS medium supplemented with 2 μM gibberellic acid. Morphological variations were observed among the regenerated plantlets. Well-developed plantlets obtained from germination media were acclimatized in the greenhouse.
KeywordsAuxin Leaf explants Gibberellic acid Somatic embryos Thidiazuron
This article was supported by the KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University.
DHK, KWK, and IS conceived and designed the experiments and wrote the paper. IS performed the somatic embryogenesis studies, and KWK performed the greenhouse experiments. All authors have seen and agreed to the submitted manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
- Bradaï F, Pliego-Alfaro F, Sánchez-Romero C (2016) Somaclonal variation in olive (Olea europaea L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis: influence of genotype and culture age on phenotypic stability. Sci Hortic 213:208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hatzilazarou S, Kostas S, Economou A, Scaltsoyiannes A (2017) Efficient propagation of Nerium oleander L. through tissue culture. Propag Ornam Plants 17:64–74Google Scholar
- Kaul K, Sabharwal PS (1975) Morphogenetic studies on Haworthia: effects of inositol on growth and differentiation. Am J Bot 62:655–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1975.tb14098.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim DH, Kang KW, Sivanesan I (2017a) In vitro propagation of Cymbidium hybrid. Propag Ornam Plants 17:48–54Google Scholar
- Kim DH, Kang KW, Sivanesan I (2017b) Micropropagation of Haworthia retusa Duval. Propag Ornam Plants 17:77–82Google Scholar
- Kumar V, Moyo M, Van Staden J (2016) Enhancing plant regeneration of Lachenalia viridiflora, a critically endangered ornamental geophyte with high floricultural potential. Sci Hortic 211:263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.08.024
- Lincy KA, Remashree AB, Sasikumar B (2009) Indirect and direct somatic embryogenesis from aerial stem explants of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Acta Bot Croat 68:93–103Google Scholar
- Liu B, Fang H, Meng C, Chen M, Chai Q, Zhang K, Liu S (2017) Establishment of a rapid and efficient micropropagation system for succulent plant Haworthia turgida haw. HortScience 52:1278–1282. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12056-17
- Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
- Ogihara Y, Tsunewaki K (1978) Tissue culture in Haworthia I. effects of auxins and kinetin on callus growth. Bot Mag Tokyo 91:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489105
- Richwine AM, Tipton JL, Thompson GA (1995) Establishment of Aloe, Gasteria and Haworthia shoot cultures from inflorescence explants. HortScience 30:1443–1444.Google Scholar
- Sherif NA, Benjamin JHF, Kumar TS, Rao MV (2018) Somatic embryogenesis, acclimatization and genetic homogeneity assessment of regenerated plantlets of Anoectochilus elatus Lindl., an endangered terrestrial jewel orchid. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 132:303–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1330-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sivanesan I, Son MS, Jana S, Jeong BR (2012) Secondary somatic embryogenesis in Crocus vernus (L.) hill. Propag Ornam Plants 12:163–170Google Scholar
- Standifer LC, O’Rourke EN, Porche-Sorbet R (1984) Propagation of Haworthia from floral scapes. Plant Prop 30:4–6Google Scholar
- Stanišić M, Raspor M, Ninković S, Milošević S, Ćalić D, Bohanec B, Trifunović M, Petrić M, Subotić A, Jevremović S (2015) Clonal fidelity of Iris sibirica plants regenerated by somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis in leaf-base culture-RAPD and flow cytometer analyses. South Afr J Bot 96:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2014.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Takamori LM, Neto NBM, Vieira LGE, Ribas AF (2015) Optimization of somatic embryogenesis and in vitro plant regeneration of Urochloa species using picloram. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 51:554–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9701-1