Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 113–119 | Cite as

Vegetation shift after a clear-cut of non-native dwarf pine (Pinus mugo)

  • Miroslav Zeidler
  • Barbora Hertlová
  • Marek Banaš
  • David Zahradník
Original Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Dwarf pine (Pinus mugo) is a shrubby, polycormon-forming woody light-demanding species in the Central-European mountains, but it is non-native in the Jeseniky Mts. (the Hercynian Mts., the Czech Republic). Dwarf pine was introduced there at the nineteenth century, and its range expansion was the reason for the removal of this species by a small-scale clear-cut (locality Keprnik Mt.). The effect of the clear-cutting was recorded by means of phytosociological relevés, and three distinct habitats (alpine grasslands, dwarf pine plantation, clear-cut) were compared 6 years after the dwarf pine removal. On the clear-cut area, the highest species diversity was documented, invasive species were missing there, but plant composition remained transitional and expansive graminoids prevailed. Vegetation shifts denoted environmental changes that were attributed to post-management processes and particular plant attributes. That should be taken into account when planning future large-scale management.

Keywords

Krummholz Management Restoration Succession Timberline 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants No. SPII2d1/49/07 of the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic and final completion by project of Palacký University in Olomouc IGA_PrF_2017_015. The anonymous reviewer is acknowledged for its advises and comments on this paper.

References

  1. Ballantye M, Pickering CM (2015) Shrub facilitation is an importatnt driver of alpine plant community diversity and functional composition. Biodivers Conserv 24:1859–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bílá K, Šipoš J, Kindlmann P, Kuras T (2016) Consequences for selected highelevation butterflies and moths from the spread of Pinus mugo into the alpine zone in the High Sudetes Mountains. PeerJ 4:e2094.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2094 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bliss LC (1971) Arctic and alpine plant life cycles. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:405–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Businský R (1998) Agregát Pinus mugo v bývalém Československu: taxonomie, rozšíření, hybridní populace a ohrožení. Zprávy Čes Bot Společ 33:29–52Google Scholar
  5. Capers RS, Taylor DW (2014) Slow recovery in a Mount Washington, New Hampshire, alpine plant community four years after disturbance. Rhodora 116:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Pyšek P, Hájek O, Knollová I, Tichý L, Danihelka J (2008) Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89:1541–1553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chytrý M, Hejcman M, Hennekens SM, Schellberg J (2009) Changes in vegetation types and Ellenberg indicator values after 65 years of fertilizer application in the Rengen Grassland Experiment. Germany Appl Veg Sci 12:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuevas YA, Zalba SM (2010) Recovery of native grasslands after removing invasive pines. Restor Ecol 18:711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Jong C, Mundelius M, Migała K (2006) Comparison of Evapotranspiration and Condensation Measurements between the Giant Mountains and the Alps. In: de Jong C, Collins D, Ranzi R (eds) Climate and Hydrology in Mountain Areas. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, pp 161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dirnböck T, Dullinger S, Köck R (2008) Organic matter accumulation following Pinus mugo Turra establishment in subalpine pastures. Plant Ecolog Divers 1:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dullinger S, Grabherr G (2003) Patterns of shrub invasion into high mountain grasslands of the northern calcareous Alps, Austria. Arctic, Antarct. Alp Res 35:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellenberg H (1988) Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 731Google Scholar
  13. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr Geobot 18:1–248Google Scholar
  14. Fartmann T, Borcharda F, Buchholz S (2015) Montane heathland rejuvenation by choppering – Effects on vascular plant and arthropod assemblages. J Nat Conserv 28:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grulich V (2012) Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition. Preslia 84:631–645Google Scholar
  16. Jeník J (1998) Biodiversity of the Hercynian mountains of central Europe. Pirineos 151–152:83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeník J, Hampel R (1992) Die waldfreien Kammlagen des Altvatergebirges (Geschichte und Ökologie). MSSGV, Stuttgart, p 104Google Scholar
  18. Jirásek J (1996) Společenstva kosodřeviny (Pinus mugo) v České republice (Plant communities of Pinus mugo in the Czech Republic). Preslia 68:1–12Google Scholar
  19. Kašák J, Mazalová M, Šipoš J, Kuras T (2015) Dwarf pine: invasive plant threatens biodiversity of alpine beetles. Biodivers Conserv 24:2399–2415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ (2003) Measuring beta diversity for presenceabsence data. J Anim Ecol 72:367–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kotowski W, Dzierża P, Czerwiński M, Kozub Ł, Śnieg (2013) Shrub removal facilitates recovery of wetland species in a rewetted fen. J Nat Conserv 21:294–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kubát K, Hrouda L, Chrtek J, Jun KZ, Kirschner J, Štěpánek J (2002) Klíč ke květeně České republiky (The key to flora of the Czech Republic). Academia, Praha, p 927Google Scholar
  23. Kueffer C, McDougall K, Alexander J, Daehler C, Edwards P, Haider S, Milbau A, Parks C, Pauchard A, Reshi ZA, Rew LJ, Schroder M, Seipel T (2013) Plant invasions into mountain protected areas: assessment, prevention and control at multiple spatial scales. In: Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Genovesi P (eds) Plant invasions in protected areas. Patterns, problems and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 89–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larcher W, Kainmüller C, Wagner J (2010) Survival types of high mountain plants under extreme temperatures. Flora 205:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Medvecká J, Jarolímek I (2010) Level of invasion across habitats in Slovakia. In: Kollman J, van Mölken T, Ravn HP (eds) Biological invasions in a changing world from science to management. Neobiota. Department of Agriculture & Ecology. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, p 107Google Scholar
  26. Mitchell RJ, Zutter BR, Gjerstad DH, Glover GR, Wood CW (1999) Competition among secondarysuccessional pine communities: a field study of effects and responses. Ecology 80:857–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mondoni A, Robin J, Probert RJ, Rossi G, Vegini E, Hay FR (2011) Seeds of alpine plants are short lived: implications for longterm conservation. Ann Bot 107:171–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Münzbergová M, Herben T (2005) Seed, dispersal, microsite, habitat and recruitment limitation: identification of terms and concepts in studies of limitation. Oecologia 145:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagy L, Grabherr G (2009) The biology of alpine habitats. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 376Google Scholar
  30. Oostra S, Majdi H, Olsson M (2006) Impact of tree species on soil carbon stocks and soil acidity in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res 21:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pašťálková H, Podrázský V, Vacek S (2001) Soils in the dwarf pine altitudinal zone of the Giant Mts. Opera Corcontica 38:205–215Google Scholar
  32. Prach K (2003) Spontaneous succession in CentralEuropean manmade habitats: what information can be used in restoration practice? Appl Veg Sci 6:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pyšek P (1993) What do we know about Calamagrostis villosa? A review of the species behaviour in secondary habitats. Preslia 65:1–20Google Scholar
  34. R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 15 May 2016
  35. Rehm EM, Feeley KJ (2013) Forest patches and the upward migration of timberline in the southern Peruvian Andes. For Ecol Manag 305:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson DM, Rundel PW (1998) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus : an introduction. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–48Google Scholar
  37. Rybníček K, Rybníčková E (2004) Pollen analyses of sediments from the summit of the Praděd range in the Hrubý Jeseník Mts (Eastern Sudetes). Preslia 76:331–347Google Scholar
  38. Sekyra J, Kociánová M, Štursová H, Kalenská J, Dvořák I, Svoboda M (2002) Frost phenomena in relationship to mountain pine. Opera Corcontica 39:69–114Google Scholar
  39. Šenfeldr M, Treml V, Maděra P, Volařík D (2014) Effects of prostrate dwarf pine on norway spruce clonal groups in the treeline ecotone of the Hrubý Jeseník Mountains, the Czech Republic. Arct Antarct Alp Res 46:430–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shiels AB, Sanford RD Jr (2001) Soil nutrient differences between two krummholzform tree species and adjacent alpine tundra. Geoderma 102:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Šibík J, Dítě D, Šibíková I, Pukajová D (2008) Plant communities dominated by Pinus mugo agg. in Central Europe comparison of the oligotrophic communities rich in Sphagnum. Phytocoenologia 38:221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Šibík J, Šibíková I, Kliment J (2010) The subalpine Pinus mugo communities of the Carpathians with a European perspective. Phytocoenologia 40:155–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2003) Changes in light and nitrogen availability under pioneer trees may indirectly facilitate tree invasions of grasslands. J Ecol 91:923–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skalický V (2000) Pinus mugo Turra. In: Hejný S, Slavík B (eds) Květena České republiky 1 (Flora of the Czech republic 1). Academia, Praha, pp 294–296Google Scholar
  45. Smart SM, Scott WA (2004) Bias in Ellenberg indicator values problems with detection of the effect of vegetation type. J Veg Sci 15:843–846Google Scholar
  46. Soukupová L, Jeník J, Frantík T (2001) Edge effect of krummholz in the Giant Mts. tundra, the Sudetes. Opera Corcontica 38:77–87Google Scholar
  47. Švajda J, Solár J, Janiga M, Buliak M (2011) Dwarf pine (Pinus mugo) and selected abiotic habitat conditions in the Western Tatra Mountains. Mt Res Dev 31:220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Svoboda M (2001) The effects of Pinus mugo (Turra) plantations on alpine tundra microclimate, vegetation distribution, and soils in Krkonoše national park, the Czech Republic. Opera Corcontica 38:189–206Google Scholar
  49. Taschler D, Neuner G (2004) Summer frost resistance and freezing patterns measured in situ in leaves of major alpine plant growth forms in relation to their upper distribution boundary. Plant Cell Environ 27:737–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, p 500Google Scholar
  51. Tichý L (2002) JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci 13:451–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Treml V, Křížek M (2006) Effects of dwarf pine (Pinus mugo) on patterned ground in the Czech part of the High Sudetes. Opera Corcontica 43:45–56Google Scholar
  53. Treml V, Křížek M, Engel Z (2010a) Classification of patterned ground based on morphometry and site characteristics: a case study from the High Sudetes, Central Europe. Permafr Periglac 21:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Treml V, Wild J, Chuman T, Potůčková M (2010b) Assessing the change in cover of nonindigenous dwarfpine using aerial photographs, a case study from the Hrubý Jeseník Mts., the Sudetes. J Land Ecol 4:90–104Google Scholar
  55. van der Maarel E (1993) Relations between sociologicalecological species groups and Ellenberg indicator values. Physiol 23:343–362Google Scholar
  56. Wagnerová Z (2001) Influence of the dwarf pine plantations (of the age 20, 40, 60 and 90 years) on the vegetation cover. Opera Corcontica 38:163–170Google Scholar
  57. Wild J, Wildová R (2002) Interactions between dwarf pine shrubs and grassland vegetation under different management. Opera Corcontica 39:17–33Google Scholar
  58. Zeidler M, Banaš M, Ženatá M (2009) Ecological conditions and the distribution of alpine juniper (Juniperus communis subsp. alpina) in the Hrubý Jeseník Mts. Biologia 64:687–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zeidler M, Duchoslav M, Banaš M, Lešková M (2012) Impacts of introduced dwarf pine (Pinus mugo) on the diversity and composition of alpine vegetation. Community Ecol 13:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miroslav Zeidler
    • 1
  • Barbora Hertlová
    • 1
  • Marek Banaš
    • 1
  • David Zahradník
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Faculty of SciencePalacky UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations