Root system morphology and primary root anatomy in natural non-metallicolous and metallicolous populations of three Arabidopsis species differing in heavy metal tolerance
- 267 Downloads
Root system morphology was characterized in the seedlings of heavy-metal sensitive Arabidopsis thaliana, the non-metallicolous (NM) and metallicolous (M) populations of the tolerant A. arenosa and A. halleri, developed on the natural soils: the Zn-Pb-Cd-Cu-contaminated (C soils), the non-contaminated (NC soils), and on an identical nutrient-rich compost. Anatomy of primary roots grown on agar medium with control and elevated zinc concentrations was investigated also in the model A. thaliana ecotype Columbia.
The three Arabidopsis species differed in morphological and/or quantitative responses to the varying soil qualities. Comparing to natural NC soil, the morphology of A. thaliana root system differed only on the compost with dominating lateral root lengths while the root lengths were reduced on the C soil. In NM and M populations of A. arenosa the lateral root elongation and density were reduced on the C soil and root growth but not lateral root density were stimulated on the compost. In NM and M populations of A. halleri the root system morphology remained unaltered in all three soils. The root elongation was reduced but lateral root initiation increased on the C soil while the roots were longer and lateral root density lower on the compost. The responses of A. arenosa or A. halleri populations differed only in absolute root lengths. The similarity in morphological responses to varying soil metal contents indicated plastic responses rather than heritable traits of the root systems.
The root tissue organization three Arabidopsis species resembled the known A. thaliana ecotype Columbia. Quantitatively, the tolerant species and their M populations had thicker roots due to a greater number and size of cells in epidermis, cortex including a higher number of middle cortex cells, and endodermis. The rates of root growth and quantitative root anatomy may represent morphological traits contributing to heavy metal tolerance of the Arabidopsis species.
Key wordsArabidopsis thaliana A. arenosa A. halleri natural populations seedlings root system root tissue organization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Banásová V., Ďurišová M., Gurinová E. & Čiamporová M. 2012. Natural vegetation, metal accumulation and tolerance in plants growing on heavy metal rich soils, pp. 233–250. In: Kothe E. & A. Varma A. (eds), Bio-geo Interactions in Metal-contaminated Soils, Soil Biology 31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-23327-2_12, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bona E., Marsano F., Cavaletto M. & Berta G. 2007. Copper stress in Cannabis sativa roots: morphological and proteomic analysis. Caryologia 60: 96–101.Google Scholar
- Fiałkiewicz B. & Rostrański A. 2006. Morphological variability of Cardaminopsis halleri (L.) Hayek from selected habitats in the Silesian Upland (Southern Poland). Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 1–2: 37–44.Google Scholar
- Fitter A. H. 1996. Characteristics and function of root system, pp. 1–20. In: Waisel Y., Eshel A. & Kafkafi U. (eds), Plant roots: The hidden half (2nd ed.), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Franiel I. & Fiałkiewicz B. 2007. Morphological variability of Cardaminopsis halleri (L.) Hayek populations from areas differing in anthropopressure level. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 16: 677–683.Google Scholar
- Kasim W.A. 2006. Changes induced by copper and cadmium stress in the anatomy and grain yield of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 8: 123–128.Google Scholar
- Kenderešovňová A., Pavlovkin J., Ďurišová M., Čiamporovčka M. 2012. Early Zn2+-induced effects on membrane potentials account for primary, unspecific demonstration of heavy metal susceptibility in tolerant and sensitive Arabidopsis species. Ann. Bot. (in press)Google Scholar
- Lucas M., Swarup R., Paponov I.A., Swarup K., Casimiro I., Lake D., Peret B., Zappala S., Mairhofer S., Whitworth M., Wang J., Ljung K., Marchant A., Sandberg G., Holdsworth M.J., Palme K., Pridmore T., Mooney S. & Bennett M.J. 2011. SHORT-ROOT regulates primary, lateral, and adventitious root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 155: 384–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martinka M. & Lux A. 2004. Response of roots of three populations of Silene dioica to cadmium treatment. Biologia 59: 185–189.Google Scholar
- Meyer C.-L., Kostecka A.A., Saumitou-Laprade P., Créach A., Castric V., Pauwels M. & Frérot H. 2010. Variability of zinc tolerance among and within populations of the pseudometallophyte species Arabidopsis halleri and possible role of directional selection. New Phytol. 185: 130–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nicola S. 1998. Transplant production and performance: understanding root systems to improve seedling quality. Hort. Technol. 8: 544–549.Google Scholar
- Scheres B., Benfey P. & Dolan L. 2002. Root development. The Arabidopsis Book. American Society of Plant Biologists, DOI: 10.1199/tab.0101.Google Scholar
- Staňová A., Banásová V. & Čiamporová M. 2010. Stratégie troch druhov rodu Arabidopsis pri nadbytku t’ažkých kovov v pôde. Bull. Slov. Bot. Spoločn. 32(Suppl. 2): 237–245Google Scholar