Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 81–87 | Cite as

Comparative morphological and palynological study on poorly known Viola sandrasea and its closest relative V. kizildaghensis

  • Muhittin Dinç
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

The relationships between the closely related Turkish endemic species, Viola sandrasea Melchior and V. kizildaghensis M. Dinç & Ş. Yıldırımlı, are discussed in the present study. Viola sandrasea has been known only from a few gatherings and insufficient description since 1939. Morphological and palynological properties of it are determined in detail and compared to its closest relative V. kizildaghensis in this study. The special habitats these species occupy, their typical associates and some other ecological features are also briefly discussed. The obtained data suggests that the morphological differences between them are sometimes subtle, but the petal colour, the leaf wrinkles and the pattern of indument are distinct. The pollen characteristics clearly appear to have taxonomic value. The pollen exine ornemantion of V. sandrasea characterized by the rugulate clearly differs from that of V. kizildaghensis characterized by psilate-perforate. Moreover, the two species are seasonally and geographically isolated from each other.

Key words

Viola kizildaghensis V. sandrasea taxonomy morphology palynology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballard H.E.Jr., Sytsma K.J. & Kowal R.R. 1999. Shrinking the violets: Phylogenetic relationships of infrageneric groups in Viola (Violaceae) based on Internal Transcribed Spacer DNA sequences. System. Bot. 23: 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker W. 1910. Violae Europaeae. Verlag von C. Heinrich, Dresden, pp. 1–153.Google Scholar
  3. Becker W. 1925. Viola L., pp. 373–376. In: Engler, A. (ed.), Parietales und Opuntiales. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  4. Blaxland K. 2004. A new species of Viola (Violaceae) from southwest Turkey. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 145: 505–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Contandriopoulos J. & Quèzel P. 1976. Contribution à l’ètude de la flore du Taurus et de l’Amanus. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 123: 419.Google Scholar
  6. Coode M.J. E. & Cullen J. 1965. Viola L., pp. 524–533. In: Davis P.H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 1. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  7. Davis P.H. 1971. Distribution patterns in Anatolia with particular reference to endemism, pp. 15–27. In: Davis P.H., Harper P.C. & Hedge I.C. (eds), Plant Life of South-West Asia. Botanical Society of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  8. Davis P.H., Mill R.R., Tan K. 1988. Viola L. pp. 62. In: Davis P.H., Mill R.R., Tan K. (eds), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 10. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  9. Dinç M., Yıldırımlı Ş., Dural H. & Savran A. 2001. A New violet record for The Flora of Turkey, Viola jordanii Hanry. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 8(1): 9–12.Google Scholar
  10. Dinç M. & Yıldırımlı Ş. 2002. A new species of Viola (Violaceae) from Turkey. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 138: 483–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dinç M., Bağcı Y., Yıldırımlı Ş. 2003. A New Species of Viola L. (Violaceae) from South Anatolia. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 141: 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faegri K. & Iversen J. 1989. Textbook of pollen analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  13. Heywood V.H. 1993. Flowering Plants of the World. University Press, London.Google Scholar
  14. Marcussen T. & Nordal I. 1998. Viola suavis, a new species in the Nordic flora, with analyses of the relation to other species in the subsection Viola (Violaceae). Nordic J. Bot. 18(2): 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marcussen T. & Borgen L. 2000. Allozymic variation and relationships within subsection Viola (Violaceae). Plant System. Evol. 223: 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcussen T., Borgen L. & Nordal I. 2005. New distributional and molecular information call into question the systematic position of the West Asian Viola sintenisii (Violaceae). Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 147: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meidner H. & Mansfield T.A. 1968. Physiology of Stomata. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  18. Melchior H. 1939. Ein neues Veilchen aus SW.-Anatolien und die Phylogenie der Sprossentwicklung innerhalb der Section Nomimium. Feddes Repert. 46: 39–42.Google Scholar
  19. Moore P.D., Webb J.A. & Collinson M.E. 1991. Pollen Analysis. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 133–140.Google Scholar
  20. Okamoto M., Okada H. & Ueda K. 1993. Morphology and chromosome number of Viola pilosa and systematic position. Taxon 42: 781–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Özhatay E. 1986. Some endemic species of Sandras Dağı (C2 Muğla) in Southwest Turkey. V. Optima Meeting Abstr., İstanbul, Turkey, 76 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Punt W., Blackmore S., Nilsson S. & Le Thomas A. 1994. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology, LPP Foundation, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  23. Valentine D.H., Merxmüller H. & Schmidth A. 1968. Viola L., pp. 270–282. In: Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M. & Web D.A. (eds), Flora Europae, vol. 2. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Wodehouse R.P. 1935. Pollen grains. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Yıldırımlı Ş. 1994. Viola bocquetiana, a new species from Turkey. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 1(1): 1–4.Google Scholar
  26. Yıldırımlı Ş. 2000. Viola L., pp. 43–44. In: Güner A., Özhatay N., Ekim T. & Başer K. H.C. (eds), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 11. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  27. Yıldırımlı Ş. & Dinç M. 2002. A New Species of Viola L., Viola ermenekensis (Violaceae) from Ermenek-Konya-Turkey. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 9(1): 1–5.Google Scholar
  28. Yuzepchuck S.V. 1949. Viola L. In: Shishkin B.K. (ed.), Flora of the U.S.S.R., vol. 15. Israel Program for Scientific Translations (1974), Israel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eğitim Fakültesi, Biyoloji BölümüSelçuk ÜniversitesiMeram, KonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations