Advertisement

Helminthologia

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 164–168 | Cite as

Note on the occurrence of parasites of the wild nutria (Myocastor coypus, Molina, 1782)

  • P. E. MartinoEmail author
  • N. Radman
  • E. Parrado
  • E. Bautista
  • C. Cisterna
  • M. P. Silvestrini
  • S. Corba
Scientific Article

Summary

We examined the endoparasites of wild nutria from the native region of South America. Individuals were infected with nineteen species, including Nematoda (82.0 %), Protozoa (46.1 %), Trematoda (33.3 %) and Cestoda (12.8%). Coccidia (Eimeria sp. or Isospora sp.), Strongyloides myopotami and Trichuris myocastoris were the most abundant and prevalent parasites. The diversity of parasite collected on individual hosts ranged from one to four species. There was no significant association between either the age or the sex of the nutria and the prevalence of parasitism, except that the number of infested nutria less than 1 year by Nematoda was significantly higher than in older individuals. Additionally, Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. were demonstrated in fecal samples, although scarcely. In general, the accessions were found in good bodily condition and carrying low parasite burdens. These numbers appeared insufficient to indicate gastrointestinal parasitism or parasitic disease.

Keywords

parasite Myocastor coypus nutria Argentina prevalence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acha, P. N., Szyfres, B. (2001): Zoonoses and Communicable Diseases Common to man and animals. 2nd Edition, Pan Americam Health Organization Publishing, Washington, 410 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, A. V., Ridley, D. S. (1970): Further observations on the formolether concentration technique for faecal parasites. J. Clin. Path., 23: 545–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babero, B. B., Lee, J. W. (1961): Studies on the helminths of nutria, Myocastor coypus (Molina), in Louisiana with check-list of other worm parasites from this host. J. Parasitol., 47(6): 378–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bessonov, A. S., Penkova, R. A., Uspensky, A. V., Shekhotsov, N. V. (1980): Veterinarysanitary examination of nutria (Myocastor coypus) carcasses for Trichinellosis. In: Proceedings of the 5th. International Conference on Trichinellosis, September 1–5. Windsor, U.K., Redbooks Ltd., pp. 423–425Google Scholar
  5. Bollo, E., Pregel, P., Gennero, S., Pizzoni, S., Rosati, S., Nebbia, P., Biolatti, B. (2003): Health status of a population of nutria (Myocastor coypus) living in a protected area in Italy. Res. Vet. Sci., 78(8): 21–25. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-5288(3)000035-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bush, O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M., Shostack, A. W. (1997): Parasitology meets ecology in its own terms. J. Parasitol. 83: 575–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Catzeflis, F. M., Hanni, C., Sourrouille, P., Douzery, E. (1995): Molecular systematics of histricograph rodents: evidence from the mitochondrial 12 SrRNA gene. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 3: 206–220Google Scholar
  8. Conder, G. B. (1982): Coypus. In: De Beer, G., Bourlière, F. (Eds) Encyclopedia of the animal world. Volume 6. Published by Bay Books Pty Ltd., Sydney, pp. 482–484Google Scholar
  9. Davis, R. A., Shillito, E. (1963): The coypu or nutria (Myocastor coypus Molina). In: UFAW Handbook: Universities Federation For Animal Welfare. Wiley and Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom. Chapter 27, pp. 457–467Google Scholar
  10. Dawes, B. (1968): The Trematoda. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 644 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Dunlap, B. G., Thies, M. L. (2002): Giardia in beaver (Castor canadensis) and nutria (Myocastor coypus) from east Texas. J. Parasitol., 88: 1254–1258. DOI: 10.1645/0022-339 (2002)088[1254:GIBC CA]2.0.CO;2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Georgi, J. R. (1974): Parasitology for veterinarians. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 386 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Gosling, L. M., Baker, S. J., Clarke, C. N. (1988): An attempt to remove coypus (Myocastor coypus) from a wetland habitat in East Anglia. J. Appl. Ecol., 25(4): 49–62Google Scholar
  14. Howerth, E. W., Reeves, A. J., Mcelveen, M., Austin, F. W. (1994): Survey for selected diseases in nutria (Myocastor coypus) from Louisiana. J. Wildlife Dis., 30(3): 450–453Google Scholar
  15. Iucn (2009): Red List of threatened species. International Union fo r the Conservation of Nature. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK. Retrieved March 13, 2010 from http://www.iucnredlist.org. DOI: 10.111/j.1472-4642.2009. 00633.xGoogle Scholar
  16. Jokipii, L. S., Pohjola, S., Jokipii, M. M. (1983): Cryptosporidium: a frequent finding in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Lancet, 2: 358–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinler, N. W., Linscombe, G., Ramsey, P. R. (1987): Nutria. In: Novak, M., Baker, J., Obbard, M. E., Malloch, B. (Eds) Wild furbearer management and conservation in North America. Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada, pp. 327–343Google Scholar
  18. Körner, E. (1985): Krankheiten bei sumpfbibern und deren behandlungsmöglichkeiten. Tierärztl. Prax., 13: 235–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lakkonen, J., Soveri, T., Henttonen, H. (1994): Prevalence of Cryptosporidium sp. in peak density Microtus agrestis, Microtus oeconomus and Clethrionomys glareolus populations. J. Wildlife Dis., 30(1): 110–111Google Scholar
  20. Martino, P. E., Stanchi, N. O. (1998): Causes of death in captive nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Argentina. Isr. J. Vet. Med., 53: 83–88Google Scholar
  21. Martino, P. E., Sassaroli, J. C., Calvo, J., Zapata, J., Gimeno, E. (2008): A mortality survey of free range nutria (Myocastor coypus). Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 54: 293–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:20011141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menard, A., Agoulon, A., L’hostis, M., Rondelaud, D., Collard, S., Chauvin, A. (2001): Myocastor coypus as a reservoir host of Fasciola hepatica in France. Vet. Res. 32(5): 499–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moretti, A., Piergili Fioretti, D., Grelloni, V., Marini, C., Leonardi, L., Velatta, F. (2001): Susceptibility of nutria (Myocastor coypus) to Trichinella infection: biological aspects. Parasite, 8(2): 206–208Google Scholar
  24. Pascal, M., Lorvelec, O., Vigne, J.D., Keith, P., Clergeau, P. (2003): Évolution holocène de la faundes vertébrés de France: invasions et disparitions. Publiée par l’Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) et le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, París, France, 381 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Pelloté, F., Pascal, M., Lorvelec, O., Clergeau, P. (2008): Les espèces invasives en Bretagne: le Ragondin (Myocastor coypus). Retrieved April 29, 2009 from http://www.bretagne-environnement.org/especes-invasives. DOI: 10.1890/080083
  26. Pridham, T. J., Budd, J., Karstad, H. A. (1966): Common diseases of fur bearing animals. II. Diseases of chinchillas, nutria, and rabbit. Can. Vet. Jour., 7,(4): 84–87Google Scholar
  27. Rübli, H. (1936): Trichinose beim sumpfbiber, Myocastor coypus Mol. Schweizer. Arch. Tierheilk., 78: 420–421Google Scholar
  28. Santos, I. C. (1992): Myocastor coypus as a wild reservoir of Fasciola hepatica. Rev. Brasileira Parasit. Vet., 1(1): 27–30Google Scholar
  29. Scaramella, D., Motti, G. (1988): Allevamento del castorino. 1st Edition, Edagricole Pub., Bologna, Italia, 133 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Scheuring, W. (1990): The examination of intestinal parasitofauna in coypu (Myocastor coypus, Molina 1782) from closed husbandries with particular regard to coccidia. Edited by Akademii Rolcniczej, Wroclaw, Polska, 41 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Soulsby, E. J. (1965): Textbook of veterinary clinical parasitology. Vol. I. Helminths. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England, 1120 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Sulaiman, I. M., Fayer, R., Bern, C., Gilman, R. H., Trout, J. M., Schantz, P. M., Das, P., Lal, A. A., Xiao, L. (2003): Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg. Inf. Dis., 9(11): 1444–1452. DOI: 10.3201/eid0911.030084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Verster, A. (1969): A taxonomic revision of the genus Taenia Linnaeus, 1758 st. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., 38: 3–58.Google Scholar
  34. Vietmeyer, N. D. (1991): Microlivestock: Little-known small animals with a promising economic future. National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 449 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Wenzel, U. (1982): Pelztiergesundheitsdienst. Tierärztliche Praxis, VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany, 254 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, E. S, Thorne, E. T. (1996): Infectious and parasitic diseases of captive carnivores, with special emphasis on the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes). Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 15(1): 91–114Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. Martino
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Radman
    • 1
  • E. Parrado
    • 2
  • E. Bautista
    • 1
  • C. Cisterna
    • 3
  • M. P. Silvestrini
    • 4
  • S. Corba
    • 4
  1. 1.Microbiology and Parasitology Department-CIC, Faculty of Veterinary SciencesUniversity of La PlataLa PlataArgentina
  2. 2.National Animal Sanitary Service (SENASA)Buenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.CIC-CCV & INTA, CC 77Morón, Buenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Statistics Department, Faculty of Veterinary SciencesUniversity of La PlataLa PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations