, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 21–27 | Cite as

Developing a dedicated cestode life cycle database: lessons from the hymenolepidids

  • F. LefebvreEmail author
  • B. B. Georgiev
  • R. A. Bray
  • D. T. J. Littlewood


The Cestode Life Cycle Database (CLCdb) project was initiated in 2005 with the objective to develop a comprehensive and centralised resource to store, retrieve and analyse key information concerning tapeworm life cycles; e.g. morphogenesis, intermediate host identities, transmission patterns, etc. It constitutes the first electronic database to deal with complex life cycle information for any helminth taxon. Here we critically evaluate our experience after exhaustively entering data for our model group, the cyclophyllidean family Hymenolepididae. After providing basic statistics (530 consulted references; ∼ 230 ‘known’ life cycle), we identify future needs in turning the CLCdb into an open access monograph covering all cestode groups. We review the added benefits and potential utilities of the database for cestodologists and other users, including ecologists and veterinarians, and we call for specialist contributions. Since late 2007, a short version of the CLCdb has been available online, with basic functionalities and tools (


tapeworms monograph e-resource larval biology biodiversity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, R. C. (2000): Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission. CABI publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Beveridge, I. (2001): The use of life-cycle characters in studies of the evolution of cestodes. In Littlewood, D. T. J. and Bray, R. A. (Eds): Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondarenko, S., Kontrimavichus, V. (2006): [Aploparaksidae of wild and domesticated birds]. In Movsesyan, S. O. (Ed): Fundamentals of Cestodology, 14. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  4. Chervy, L. (2002): The terminology of larval cestodes or metacestodes. Syst. Parasitol., 52: 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cribb, T. H., Bray, R. A., Olson, P. D., Littlewood, D. T. J. (2003): Life cycle evolution in the Digenea: a new perspective from phylogeny. Adv. Parasitol., 54: 197–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Czaplinski, B., Vaucher, C. (1994): Family Hymenolepididae Ariola, 1899. In Khalil, L. F., Jones, A. and Bray, R. A. (Eds): Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Genov, T. (1984): [Helminths of insectivores and rodents in Bulgaria]. Izdatelstvo na Balgarskata Akademiya na Naukite, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoberg, E. P., Jones, A., Rausch, R. L., Eom, K. S., Gardner, S. L. (2000): A phylogenetic hypothesis for species of the genus Taenia (Eucestoda: Taeniidae). J. Parasitol., 86: 89–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Janzen, D. H. (2004): Now is the time. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 359: 731–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McLaughlin, J. D. (2003): An annotated checklist of hymenolepidid cestodes described from birds: 1983–2002, Parassitologia, 45: 33–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Maksimova, A. P. (1989): [Hymenolepidid cestodes of the water fowl of Kazakhstan]. Akademiya Nauk Kazakhskoi SSR, Alma-AtaGoogle Scholar
  12. Morand, S., Poulin, R. (2003): Phylogenies, the comparative method and parasite evolutionary ecology. Adv. Parasitol., 54: 281–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schmidt, G. D. (1986): Handbook of tapeworm identification. CRC Press, Inc., Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. Soberón, J., Peterson, A. T. (2004): Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 359: 689–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spasskaya, L. P. (1966): [Cestoda of birds in the USSR: Hymenolepididae]. Izdatel’stvo Nauka, MoskvaGoogle Scholar
  16. Wheeler, Q. D. (2004): Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B, 359: 571–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yamaguti, S. (1975): A synoptical review of life histories of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates with special reference to the morphology of their larval forms. Keigaku Publishing Co., KyotoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Lefebvre
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • B. B. Georgiev
    • 3
  • R. A. Bray
    • 4
  • D. T. J. Littlewood
    • 4
  1. 1.PoitiersFrance
  2. 2.The Natural History MuseumLondonUK
  3. 3.Central Laboratory of General EcologyBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  4. 4.Department of ZoologyThe Natural History MuseumLondonUK

Personalised recommendations