Acta Parasitologica

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 302–310 | Cite as

Morphological and molecular characterisation of the entomoparasitic nematode Hammerschmidtiella diesingi (Nematoda, Oxyurida, Thelastomatidae)

  • María V. Blanco
  • Paola Lax
  • Juan C. Rondan Dueñas
  • Cristina N. Gardenal
  • Marcelo E. Doucet
Original Paper

Abstract

A population of Hammerschmidtiella diesingi was detected in specimens of Periplaneta americana collected in Córdoba city (Argentina) was studied. Nematodes were characterized based on morphological, morphometric and genetic (D2–D3 expansion segment) analyses. New data are provided, especially on particular morphological characters that were a matter of controversy in previous studies. H. diesingi is reported in Argentina for the first time.

Keywords

Argentina D2-D3 expansion segment Hammerschmidtiella diesingi morphology morphometry Periplaneta americana 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamson M. 1994. Evolutionary patterns in life histories of Oxyurida. International Journal for Parasitology, 24, 1167–1177. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90189-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamson M.L., Clease D.F. 1989. Morphological changes during in ovo development in the Thelastomatoidea: description and functional considerations. Journal of Parasitology, 75, 728–734. DOI: 10.2307/3283057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamson M.L., Nasher A.K. 1987. Hammerschmidtiella andersoni sp. n. (Thelastomatidae: Oxyurida) from the diplopod, Archispirostreptus tumuliporus, in Saudi Arabia with comments on the karyotype of Hammerschmidtiella diesingi. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 54, 220–224.Google Scholar
  4. Adamson M.L., van Waerebeke D. 1992. Revision of the Thelastomatoidea, Oxyurida of invertebrate hosts I. Thelastomatidae. Systematic Parasitology, 21, 21–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell W.J., Roth L.M., Nalepa C.A. 2007. Cockroaches: ecology, behavior, and natural history. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 248 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Biswas P.K., Chakravarty G.K. 1963. The systematic studies of the zoo-parasitic oxyuroid nematodes. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 23, 411–428. DOI: 10.1007/BF00259929.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Camino N.B., Marino H.A. 2002. Blatarios domiciliarios parasitados por nematodos. Libro de resúmenes, V Congreso Argentino de Entomología. Buenos Aires. Marzo de 2002, 429 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  8. Camino N.B., Quelas M.A. 2008. Descripción de Thelastoma domesticus sp. nov. (Oxyurida, Thelastomatidae) parásita de ninfas Periplaneta americana (Blattodea, Blattidae) en Argentina. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 98, 24–27. DOI:10.1590/S0073-47212008000100003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carreno R.A., Tuhela L. 2011. Thelastomatid nematodes (Oxyurida: Thelastomatoidea) from the peppered cockroach, Archimandrita tesselata (Insecta: Blattaria) in Costa Rica. Comparative Parasitology, 78, 39–55. DOI: 10.1654/4455.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chitwood B.G. 1932. A synopsis of the nematodes parasitic in insects of the family Blattidae. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 5, 14–50. DOI: 10.1007/BF02120633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crespo F.A., Valverde A. del C. 2005. Blattaria-Cucarachas. In: (Ed. O.D. Salomón) Artrópodos de interés médico en la Argentina. 1a Edición. Fundación Mundo Sano. Buenos Aires, pp. 107–113.Google Scholar
  12. Dobrovolny C.G. 1933. Studies on the nematode parasites of the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 36, 213. DOI: 10.2307/3625358 (Abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabryelow K., Lonc E. 1986. Parasites of Periplaneta americana from laboratory rearing. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne, 32, 75–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta R. 1997. Description of the two species of nematodes of cockroach (Periplaneta americana) reported from Nepal. Tribhuvan University Journal, 20, 25–30.Google Scholar
  15. Gupta N.K., Kaur J. 1978. On some nematodes from invertebrates in Northern India. Part I. Revista Ibérica de Parasitología, 38, 301–324.Google Scholar
  16. Hammerschmidt K.E. 1838. Helminthologische Beitrage. Isis von Oken, 5, 351–358.Google Scholar
  17. Hominick W.M. 1972. Relationships among Leidynema appendiculata, Hammerschmidtiella diesingi (Nematoda: Thelastomatidae) and the American cockroach: the influence of host physiology on numbers of parasites. PhD Thesis, Institute of Parasitology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Jain M., Kaur L. 2001. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of nematode parasites of cockroaches from Chandigarh. Journal of Parasitology and Applied Animal Biology, 10, 55–58.Google Scholar
  19. Jex A.R., Hu M., Rose H.A., Schneider M., Cribb T.H., Gasser R.B. 2006. Molecular characterization of Thelastomatoidea (Nematoda: Oxyurida) from cockroaches in Australia. Parasitology, 133, 123–129. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182006009978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khairal A.A., Paran T.P. 1977. Parasites of Periplaneta americana Linn., in Penang, Malaysia. I. Thelastoma malaysiense, new species, with notes on Hammerschmidtiella diesingi and Leidynema appendiculata. Malayan Nature Journal, 30, 69–77.Google Scholar
  21. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111–120. DOI: 10.1007/BF01731581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kloss G.R. 1966. Revisão dos nematóides de Blattaria do Brasil. Papéis Avulsos do Departamento de Zoologia, 18, 147–188.Google Scholar
  23. Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I.M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Higgins D.G. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947–2948. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lax P. 2008. Nematode parasites of the urban cockroach Periplaneta americana from Córdoba city, Argentina. Fifth International Congress of Nematology, Brisbane, Australia, 13–18 July 2008, 12 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  25. Lax P., Blanco M.V., Doucet M.E. 2009. Detección de un nematodo del género Hammerschmidtiella en Periplaneta americana en la ciudad de Córdoba. V Congreso Argentino de Parasitología, 25–28 March 2009, 100 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  26. Lax P., Rondan Dueñas J.C., Gardenal C.N., Doucet M.E. 2007. Assessment of genetic variability in Nacobbus aberrans (Thorne, 1935) Thorne & Allen, 1944 (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae) populations from Argentina. Nematology, 9, 261–270. DOI: 10.1163/156854107780739063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee D.L. 1958. On the morphology of the male, female and fourthstage larva (female) of Hammerschmidtiella diesingi (Hammerschmidt), a nematode parasitic in cockroaches. Parasitology, 48, 433–436. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182000021375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leibersperger E. 1960. Die Oxyuroidea der europäischen Arthropoden. Parasitologische Schriftenreihe, 2, 1–150.Google Scholar
  29. Maggenti A. 1981. General Nematology. Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc., 372 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Page R.D.M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 12, 357–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pawlik J. 1966. Control of the nematode Leidynema appendiculata (Leidy) (Nematoda: Rhabditida: Thelastomatidae) in laboratory cultures of the American cockroach. Journal of Economic Entomology, 59, 468–469.Google Scholar
  32. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 1253–1256. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn083.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rao P.N. 1958. Studies on the nematode parasites of insects and other arthropods. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, 46, 33–83.Google Scholar
  34. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MrBayes version 3.0: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shah M.M. 2007. Some studies on insect parasitic nematodes (Oxyurida, Thelastomatoidea, Thelastomatidae) from Manipur, North-East India. Acta Parasitologica, 52, 346–362. DOI: 10.2478/s11686-007-0051-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma R.K., Gupta L.N. 1983. A new entomogenous nematode Hammerschmidtiella bareillyi from Periplaneta americana. Revista Ibérica de Parasitología, 43, 319–323.Google Scholar
  37. Singh H.S., Agarwal A. 1998. Further observation on Hammerschmidtiella diesingi Chitwood, 1932, with a note on early embryonic development and validity of various species of the genus. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology, 18, 27–36.Google Scholar
  38. Singh H.S., Kaur H. 1988. On a new nematode, Hammerschmidtiella bisiri n. sp. from Periplaneta americana Linn. Indian Journal of Parasitology, 12, 187–189.Google Scholar
  39. Spiridonov S.E., Guzeeva E.A. 2009. Phylogeny of nematodes of the superfamily Thelastomatoidea (Oxyurida) inferred from LSU rDNA sequence. Russian Journal of Nematology, 17, 127–134.Google Scholar
  40. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596–1599. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msm092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thyssen P.J., de Carvalho Moretti T., Tiduko Ueta M., Ribeiro O.B. 2004. O papel de insetos (Blattodea, Diptera e Hymenoptera) como possíveis vetores mecanicos de helmintos em ambiente domiciliar e peridomiciliar. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 20, 1096–1102. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-311X2004000400025.Google Scholar
  42. Todd A.C. 1944. On the development and hatching of the eggs of Hammerschmidtiella diesingi and Leidynema appendiculatum, nematodes of roaches. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 63, 54–67. DOI: 10.2307/3223338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wharton D.A. 1979. The structure and formation of the egg-shell of Hammerschmidtiella diesingi Hammerschmidt (Nematoda: Oxyuroidea). Parasitology, 79, 1–12. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182000051933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yu X., Crites J.L. 1986. Scanning electron microscope studies on Hammerschmidtiella diesingi (Nematoda: Oxyuroidea). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 53, 117–120.Google Scholar
  45. Zhang L., Hu M., Chilton N.B., Huby-Chilton F., Beveridge I., Passer R.B. 2007. Nucleotide alterations in the D3 domain of the large subunit of ribosomal DNA among 21 species of equine strongyle. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 21, 111–115. DOI:10.1016/j.mcp.2006.08.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • María V. Blanco
    • 1
  • Paola Lax
    • 1
  • Juan C. Rondan Dueñas
    • 2
  • Cristina N. Gardenal
    • 3
  • Marcelo E. Doucet
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Nematología, Centro de Zoología Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y NaturalesUniversidad Nacional de CórdobaCórdobaArgentina
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Biología MolecularPabellón CEPROCORCórdobaArgentina
  3. 3.Cátedra de Genética de Poblaciones y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y NaturalesUniversidad Nacional de CórdobaCórdobaArgentina

Personalised recommendations