Acta Parasitologica

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 14–19 | Cite as

Nanotrema niokoloensis sp. nov. and a redescription of N. citharini Paperna, 1969 (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae) from the gills of Citharinus citharus citharus (Characiformes, Citharinidae) from Senegal

  • Nad’a Musilová
  • Eva Řehulková
  • Milan Gelnar


One previously described and 1 new species of Nanotrema Paperna, 1969 are reported from the gills of Citharinus citharus citharus (Citharinidae) collected from the Niokolo Koba River, Senegal. Nanotrema citharini Paperna, 1969 is redescribed, based on the re-examination of the type specimens and new information obtained from material taken in Senegal (new locality record). Nanotrema niokoloensis sp. nov. is distinguished primarily by possessing a copulatory organ composed of a long thin tube with median portion usually coiled into about 2.5 rings and an accessory piece resembling a braid lying within the rings. Based on the presence of the dorsal anchors modified into paired haptoral spikes, which lack an associated bar, species of Nanotrema phenotypically appear to be related to those of Neotropical Rhinoxenus Kritsky, Boeger et Thatcher, 1988 and Indian Spicocleidus Agrawal, Tripathi et Shukla, 2005.


Monogenea Nanotrema niokoloensis sp. nov. Nanotrema citharini Characiformes Citharinus citharus citharus Africa 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawal N., Tripathi A., Shukla R. 2005. Spicocleidus namae n. g., n. sp. (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) on Chanda nana (Hamilton) from Lucknow, India. Systematic Parasitology, 61, 185–189. DOI: 10.1007/s11230-005-3161-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boeger W.A., Domingues M.V., Pavanelli G.C. 1995. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 24. Rhinoxenus bulbovaginatus n. sp. (Dactylogyridae, Ancyrocephalinae) from the nasal cavity of Salminus maxillosus (Osteichthyes, Characidae) from the Rio Paraná, Paraná, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 90, 695–698. DOI: 10.1590/S0074-02761995000600007.Google Scholar
  3. Domingues M.V., Boeger W.A. 2005. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 47. Phylogeny and coevolution of species of Rhinoxenus (Platyhelminthes, Monogenoidea, Dactylogyridae) and their Characiformes hosts (Teleostei, Ostariophysi) with description of four new species. Zoosytema, 27, 441–467.Google Scholar
  4. Ergens R. 1969. The suitability of ammonium picrate-glycerin in preparing slides of lower Monogenoidea. Folia Parasitologica, 16, 320.Google Scholar
  5. Gussev A.V. 1976. Freshwater Indian Monogenoidea. Principles of systematics, analysis of the world faunas and their evolution. Indian Journal of Helminthology, 25 & 26, 1–241.Google Scholar
  6. Khalil L.F., Polling L. 1997. Check List of the Helminth Parasites of African Freshwater Fishes. University of the North, Republic of South Africa, 185 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Kritsky D.C., Boeger W.A. 1995. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 26. Annulotrematoides amazonicus, a new genus and species (Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae), from the gills of Psectrogaster rutiloides (Kner) (Teleostei: Characiformes: Curimitidae) from the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 108, 528–532.Google Scholar
  8. Kritsky D.C., Boeger W.A., Thatcher V.E. 1988. Neotropical Monogenea 11. Rhinoxenus, new genus (Dactylogyridae, Ancyrocephalinae) with description of three new species from the nasal cavities of Amazonian Characoidea. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 101, 87–94.Google Scholar
  9. Kritsky D.C., Kulo S.-D. 1992. A revision of Schilbetrema (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae), with descriptions of four new species from African Schilbeidae (Siluriformes). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 111, 278–301. DOI: 10.2307/3226704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kritsky D.C., Kulo S.-D., Boeger W.A. 1987. Resurrection of Characidotrema Paperna and Thurston, 1968 (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) with description of two new species from Togo, Africa. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 54, 175–184.Google Scholar
  11. Lowe-McConnell R.H. (Ed.). 1975. Fish communities in tropical freshwaters: their distribution, ecology and evolution. Longman Publishing, London, 337 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Malmberg G. 1957. On the occurrence of Gyrodactylus on Swedish fishes. Skrifter utgivna av Sodra Sveriges Fiskeriforening, (1956), 19–76 (In Swedish).Google Scholar
  13. Mizelle J.D. 1936. New species of trematodes from the gills of Illinois fishes. American Midland Naturalist, 17, 785–806. DOI: 10.2307/2420687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Paperna I. 1969. Monogenetic trematodes of fish of the Volta basin and south Ghana. Bulletin de l’Institute Fondamental d’Afrique Noir, 31, 840–880.Google Scholar
  15. Winemiller K.O. 1996. Dynamic diversity: Fish communities of tropical rivers. In: (Eds. M.L. Cody and J.A. Smallwood) Longterm studies of vertebrate communities. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nad’a Musilová
    • 1
  • Eva Řehulková
    • 1
  • Milan Gelnar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of ScienceMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations