Acta Parasitologica

, 54:12 | Cite as

Two new species of entobdelline skin parasites (Monogenea, Capsalidae) from the blotched fantail ray, Taeniura meyeni, in the Pacific Ocean, with comments on spermatophores and the male copulatory apparatus

  • Ian D. WhittingtonEmail author
  • Graham C. Kearn


We made a comparative anatomical study of entobdelline monogenean skin parasites from the blotched fantail ray, Taeniura meyeni (= T. melanospila) from public aquaria and fish-holding facilities distributed widely across the western Pacific Ocean. These facilities were located in Australia (Mooloolaba, southern Queensland; Cairns, northern Queensland), Taiwan and Japan. The capture localities of the aquarium fishes are unknown to us, with the exception of the individual fish from northern Queensland which came from Sudbury Reef, a local inshore reef. Entobdellines from southern Queensland differed morphologically from those from northern Queensland and Taiwan and the 2 new monogenean species are described and named Neoentobdella garneri sp. nov. and N. taiwanensis sp. nov., respectively. We determined that an entobdelline collected by Dyer and co-workers from a ray identified as T. melanospila (= T. meyeni) from an aquarium in Okinawa, Japan and identified by them as Entobdella squamula (Heath, 1902) Johnston, 1929 was misidentified and is tentatively assigned to N. taiwanensis sp. nov. The male copulatory organ of each new species resembles a penis, but evidence that these organs are eversible like a cirrus is presented. Caution is advised in deciding whether the male copulatory organs of capsalids may function as a penis or as a cirrus and we suggest that possession of a penis versus a cirrus may not necessarily indicate wide evolutionary divergence. In N. garneri, spermatophores consist of a sausage-shaped capsule and a long hollow stalk. A spermatophore received from a donor is anchored in the vagina by means of the stalk, with the capsule protruding outside the body.


Platyhelminthes Monogenea Entobdellinae Neoentobdella stingrays Dasyatidae spermatophores penis cirrus functional morphology 


  1. Dyer W.G., Williams E.H.Jr., Bunkley Williams L. 1989. Monogeneans from marine fishes of Okinawa, Japan. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 56, 64–68.Google Scholar
  2. El-Naggar M.M., El-Naggar A.A., Kearn G.C. 2004. Swimming in Gyrodactylus rysavyi (Monogenea, Gyrodactylidae) from the Nile catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Acta Parasitologica, 49, 102–107.Google Scholar
  3. Froese R., Pauly D. (Eds.). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication., version (07/2008).Google Scholar
  4. Kearn G.C. 1979. Studies on gut pigment in skin-parasitic monogeneans, with special reference to the monocotylid Dendromonocotyle kuhlii. International Journal for Parasitology, 9, 545–552. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(79)90011-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kearn G.C. 1998. Parasitism and the Platyhelminths. Chapman & Hall, London, U.K., 544 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Kearn G.C. 1999. The survival of monogenean (platyhelminth) parasites on fish skin. Parasitology, 119, S57–S88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kearn G.C., Whittington I.D. 1991. Swimming in a sub-adult monogenean of the genus Entobdella. International Journal for Parasitology, 21, 739–741. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(91)90 090-T.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kearn G.C., Whittington I.D. 2005. Neoentobdella gen. nov. for species of Entobdella Blainville in Lamarck, 1818 (Monogenea, Capsalidae, Entobdellinae) from stingray hosts, with descriptions of two new species. Acta Parasitologica, 50, 32–48.Google Scholar
  9. Kearn G.C., Whittington I.D., Evans-Gowing R. 2007. Arevision of Entobdella Blainville in Lamarck, 1818, with special emphasis on the nominal (type) species. Entobdella hippoglossi (Müller, 1776) Blainville, 1818. (Monogenea: Capsalidae: Entobdellinae) from teleost flatfishes, with descriptions of three new species and a new genus. Zootaxa, 1659, 1–54.Google Scholar
  10. Last P.R., Stevens J.D. 1994. Sharks and rays of Australia. CSIRO Division of Fisheries, Australia, 513 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Llewellyn J., Euzet L. 1964. Spermatophores in the monogenean Entobdella diadema Monticelli from the skin of sting-rays, with a note on the taxonomy of the parasite. Parasitology, 54, 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tappenden T., Kearn G.C., Evans-Gowing R. 1993. Fertilization and the functional anatomy of the germarium in the monogenean Entobdella soleae. International Journal for Parasitology, 23, 901–911. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(93)90056-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Whittington I.D., Kearn G.C. 2008. Trimusculotrema heronensis sp. nov. (Monogenea, Capsalidae) from the skin of the pink whipray Himantura fai (Elasmobranchii, Dasyatidae) from Heron Island, Queensland, Australia. Acta Parasitologica, 53, 251–257. DOI: 10.2478/s11686-008-0044-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Whittington I.D, Kearn G.C. Two new species of Neoentobdella (Monogenea, Capsalidae, Entobdellinae) from the skin of Australian stingrays (Dasyatidae). Folia Parasitologica, in press.Google Scholar
  15. Whittington I.D., Deveney M.R., Wyborn S.J. 2001. A revision of Benedenia Diesing, 1858 including a redescription of B. sciaenae (van Beneden, 1856) Odhner, 1905 and recognition of Menziesia Gibson, 1976 (Monogenea: Capsalidae). Journal of Natural History, 35, 663–777. DOI: 10.1080/0022293015 2023090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monogenean Research Laboratory, Parasitology SectionThe South Australian MuseumAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Marine Parasitology Laboratory, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DX 650 418)The University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations