Ionospheric response to magnetic activity at low and mid-latitude stations
- 88 Downloads
The F2-layer response to the moderate storm of 5–7 April 2010 was investigated using data from two equatorial stations (Ilorin: lat. 8.5°N, 4.5°E; Kwajalein: lat. 9°N, long. 167.2°E) and mid-latitude (San Vito: lat. 40.6°N, long. 17.8°E; Pruhonice: lat. 50°N, long. 14.6°E). Before storm commencement, enhancement, and depletion of NmF2 values were observed in the equatorial and mid-latitude stations, respectively, indicating the latitudinal dependence of the pre-storm event. All the stations with the exception of Kwajalein show positive phase in NmF2 response at the storm onset stage. Positive phase in NmF2 continues over Ilorin and appears on the daytime ionosphere of Kwajalein on 6 April, whereas negative phase suppressed the positive feature in Pruhonice and San Vito until the recovery condition. The differences in the response of F2-layer to the storm for the two equatorial stations were attributed to their longitudinal differences. On the average, both the AE and D st indices revealed poor correlation relationship. More studies are required to ascertain this finding.
Key wordsmoderate storm equatorial station ionosphere electric field positive phase mid-latitude
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adebesin, B.O., J.O. Adeniyi, I.A. Adimula, and B.W. Reinisch (2013), Equatorial vertical plasma drift velocities and electron densities inferred from groundbased ionosonde measurements during low solar activity, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 97, 58–64, DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2013.02.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Adebiyi, S.J., J.O. Adeniyi, I.A. Adimula, B. Joshua, and M. Gwani (2012), Effect of the geomagnetic storm of April 5th to 7th, 2010, on the F2-layer of the ionosphere of Ilorin, Nigeria, World J. Eng. Pure Appl. Sci. 2,2, 56–62.Google Scholar
- David, T.W. (2013), Investigation into quiet and magnetic storms periods above Magadan during October–December 2003, Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 42,2, 89–96.Google Scholar
- Joshua, B., J.O. Adeniyi, I.A. Adimula, M. Abbas, and S.J. Adebiyi (2011), The effect of magnetic storm of May 2010 on the F2 layer over the Ilorin ionosphere, World J. Young Res. 1,5, 71.Google Scholar
- Kikuchi, T., H. Lühr, T. Kitamura, O. Saka, and K. Schlegel (1996), Direct penetration of the polar electric field to the equator during a DP2 event as detected by the auroral and equatorial magnetometer chains and the EISCAT radar, J. Geophys. Res. 101,A8, 17161–17173, DOI: 10.1029/96JA01299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kikuchi, T., K.K. Hashimoto, and K. Nozaki (2008), Penetration of magnetospheric electric fields to the equator during a geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res. 113, A6, DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012628.Google Scholar
- Li, Z., F. Wei, X. Feng, J. Guo, B.A. Emery, and X. Zhao (2012), Large ionospheric disturbances during a minor geomagnetic storm on June 23, 2000, Ann. Geophys. 55,2, 253–263, DOI: 10.4401/ag-5409.Google Scholar
- Liu, L., W. Wan, M.-L. Zhang, B. Zhao, and B. Ning (2008), Prestorm enhancements in NmF2 and total electron content at low latitudes, J. Geophys. Res. 113,A2, A02311, DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012832.Google Scholar
- Mukherjee, S., S. Sarkar, P.K. Purohit, and A.K. Gwal (2010), Effect of geomagnetic storms in the Equatorial Anomaly Region observed from ground based data, Int. J. Geomat. Geosci. 1,3, 477–488.Google Scholar
- Prölss, G.W. (1995), Ionospheric F-region storms. In: H. Volland (ed.), Handbook of Atmospheric Electrodynamics, Vol. 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 195–248.Google Scholar
- Uma, G., P.S. Brahmanandam, Y. Kakinami, A. Dmitriev, N.S.M.P.L. Devi, K. Uday Kiran, D.S.V.V. Prasad, P.V.S. Rama Rao, K. Niranjan, C.S. Babu, and Y.H. Chu (2012), Ionospheric responses to two large geomagnetic storms over Japanese and Indian longitude sectors, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 74, 94–110, DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2011.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar