Radon and remediation measures near Băiţa-Ştei old uranium mine (Romania)
- 143 Downloads
Băiţa-Ştei mine is an open pit mine in NW Romania (West Carpathian Mountains). It was the largest surface uranium deposit in the world. Two means of uranium transport and dissemination were used over time. The first was the natural way, represented by transportation of geological sediments by Crişul-Băiţa River that crosses the Băiţa surface deposit. These sediments were used as building materials (stone, gravel, sand). The second way was related to the people living in this valley, who used also the uranium waste as building material. The preliminary indoor radon concentrations measured in the buildings ranged from 40 to 4000 Bq m−3 with a mean value of 241 Bq m−3. A focused radon survey facilitated the selection of 20 houses with the highest indoor radon that were therefore proposed for remediation. To find the radon sources of these houses, systematic investigations on radon were performed. The remedial measures for these 20 houses were tested on a chosen pilot house.
Key wordsBaita uranium mine indoor radon radon potential prone area remedial measures pilot house
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barnet, I., P. Pacherová, M. Neznal, and N. Neznal (2008), Radon in geological environment: Czech experience, CGS Special Papers 19, Czech Geological Survey, Prague.Google Scholar
- Dumitrescu, N. (2010), Low grade uranium ore. In: Vienna Meeting “Uranium Mining and Milling in Romania”, 29–31 March 2010 (oral presentation).Google Scholar
- Janik, M., S. Tokanami, T. Kovács, N. Kávási, C. Kranrod, A. Sorimachi, H. Takahashi, N. Miyahara, and T. Ishikawa (2009), International intercomparisons of integrating radon detectors in the NIRS radon chamber, Appl. Radiat. Istopes 67,9, 1691–1696, DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matolin, M. (2010), Protocol on the evaluation of comparison measurement of radon (222Rn) activity concentration in soil gas at reference sites Cetyne, Bohostice and Buk (Czech Republic), Report.Google Scholar
- Neznal, M., M. Neznal, M. Matolín, I. Barnet, and J. Miksova (2004), The new method for assessing the radon risk of building sites, CGS Special Papers 16, Czech Geological Survey, Prague.Google Scholar
- Papp, B. (2011), Radon and radon flux from soil. Applications in environmental science, geology and geophysics, Ph.D. Thesis, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca (in Roumanian).Google Scholar
- Plch, J., and M. Eng (1997), Manual for operating LUK 3A, SMM Prague.Google Scholar
- Sainz, C., A. Dinu, T. Dicu, K. Szacsvai, C. Cosma, and L.S. Quindós (2009), Comparative risk assessment of residential radon exposures in two radon-prone areas, Ştei (Romania) and Torrelodones (Spain), Sci. Total. Environ. 407, 15, 4452–4460, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2009.04.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sandor, G.N., A. Poffijn, and C. Cosma (1999), Indoor radon survey in a uranium area from Romania. In: Proc. “Radon in the Living Environment”, 19–23 April 1999, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
- Trută-Popa, L.A., C. Cosma, and W. Hofmann (2012), Lung cancer attributed to radon exposure, for the general population: Estimation and prevention. In: Zhiyong Zhang (ed.), Risk Assessment and Management, Editura Academy Publish., Wyoming, USA, 422–445.Google Scholar