Central European Journal of Medicine

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 118–123 | Cite as

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) for disinfection of oral wounds. In vitro study

  • Zbyněk Matějka
  • Václava Adámková
  • Roman Šmucler
  • Jana Svobodová
  • Hana Hubálková
Research article

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the antimicrobial effects of photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT), an ordinary antiseptic (chlorhexidini digluconas), and an antibiotic therapy (bacitracinum zincicum and neomycini sulfas) in vitro.

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an area of great interest for its potential use as an antimicrobial therapy. It is currently a popular topic in modern medical literature. PDT is, according to recent publications, advantageous over other types of therapies because it acts nonspecifically and it is impossible to develop resistance to the therapy.

Materials and Methods

We investigated the antibacterial effect of these three forms of antiseptics on the selection of G+, G-, aerobic, and anaerobic bacteria that exist in the oral cavity and are involved in the formation of periodontal diseases.

Results & Conclusion

We found that the PACT device did not have a sufficient antimicrobial effect in vitro. In contrast, the disinfection agents containing chlorhexidini digluconas were effective and may be a safe, non-specific alternative to antibiotic treatments. Promising results from some clinical studies can have different mechanism of action as disinfection.

Keywords

Laser Chlorhexidin Photodynamic therapy Antibiotics Disinfection Ozonization Oral cavity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Katie O’Riordan, Oleg E. Akilov, Tayyaba Hasan PhD, The potential for photodynamic therapy in the treatment of localized infections. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2698, USA; Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy (2005); 2, 247–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Raab O. Ueber die wirkung fluoreszierender stoffe auf infusoria. Z Biol (1900);39:524–546Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Seidler V., Linetskiy I., Hubalkova H., Stankova H., Smucler R., Mazanek J. Ozone and its usage in general medicine and dentistry. A review article. Prague medical report (2008). 109(1) (pp 5–13)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Torres-Lagares, J. L. Gutierrez-Perez, P. Infante-Cossio, M. Garcia-Calderon, M. M. Romero-Ruiz, M. A. Serrera-Figallo: Randomized, double-blind study on effectiveness of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel in reducing the incidence of alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery.; Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. (2006) 35: 348–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Soukos NS, Wilson M, Burns T, Speight PM. Photodynamic effects of toluidine blue on human oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts and Streptococcus sanguis evaluated in vitro. Lasers Surg Med (1996);18:253–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lavi A, Weitman H, Holmes RT, Smith KM, Ehrenberg B. The depth of porphyrin in a membrane and the membrane’s physical properties affect the photosensitizing efficiency. Biophys J (2002);82:2101–2110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: Part one Photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagn Photodynam Ther (2004); 1:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Salmon-Divon M, Nitzan Y, Malik Z. Mechanistic aspects of Escherichia coli photodynamic inactivation by cationic tetra-meso(N-methylpyridyl)porphine. Photochem Photobiol Sci (2004);3:423–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Schafer M, Schmitz C, Facius R, et al. Systematic study of parameters influencing the action of rose bengal with visible light on bacterial cells: comparison between the biological effect and singlet-oxygen production. Photochem Photobiol (2000);71:514–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Schafer M, Schmitz C, Horneck G. High sensitivity of Deinococcus radiodurans to photodynamically produced singlet oxygen. Int J Radiat Biol (1998);74:249–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Bertoloni G, Lauro FM, Cortella G, Merchat M. Photosensitizing activity of hematoporphyrin on Staphylococcus aureus cells.; Biochim Biophys Acta (2000);1475:169–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Aysin Dumani, Oguz Yoldas, A. Sehnaz Isci, Fatih Köksal, Begüm Kayar, Esra Polat Disifection of artificially contaminated Resilon cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite addifferent time exposures; Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Path ology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology (2007) 103(3): e82–e85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bettina Basrani, Leo Tjäderhane, J. Miguel Santos, et al. Efficacy of chlorhexidine — and calcium hydroxide — containing medicaments against Enteroccocus faecalis in vitro; Oral Surgery, Or al Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontics, 96,(5) (2003): 618–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Garcez AS, Nuńez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS. Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion; J Endod. Feb (2008);34(2):138–142. Epub 2007 Dec 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Zanin IC, Gonçalves RB, Junior AB, Hope CK, Pratten J. Susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans biofilms to photodynamic therapy: an in vitro study. J Antimicrob Chemother. Aug (2005);56(2):324–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Lee M T, Bird P S, Walsh L J Photo Activated Disinfection of the root canal: a new role for lasers in endodontics. Australian Endodontic Journal (2004); 30: 93–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Williams J A, Pearson G J, Colles M J, Wilson M The photo-activated antibacterial action of toluidine blue O in a collagen matrix and in carious dentine. Caries Res (2004); 38: 530–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Bonsor S J, Nichol R, Reid T M S, Pearson G J Microbiological evaluation of Photo-Activated Disinfection in endodontics (An in vivo study). British Dental Journal (2006); 200: 337–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zbyněk Matějka
    • 1
  • Václava Adámková
    • 1
  • Roman Šmucler
    • 2
  • Jana Svobodová
    • 1
  • Hana Hubálková
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinic of Child Surgery Clinical CentreNisSerbia
  2. 2.University School of MedicineNisSerbia

Personalised recommendations