Central European Journal of Biology

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 177–187 | Cite as

The distribution and the abundance of hydrophytes along the Danube River in Serbia

  • Dragana Vukov
  • Pal Boža
  • Ružica Igić
  • Goran Anačkov
Research Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

The Danube River runs through Serbia with flow 588 km long. Different hydrological, geological and ecological conditions occuring along the Danube in Serbia enables its division into four sections: The upper region, Đerdap I accumulation, Đerdap II accumulation, and the lower region. Each section is characterized by unique plant species diversity, frequency of occurrence and distribution pattern. The species diversity ranged from low in the upper reach, to high or very high in the impoundments and decreased in the lower reach. This paper provides a basis for a detailed study on the influence of large power plant impoundments over the aquatic vegetation of rivers.

Keywords

Aquatic vegetation Macrophytes Impoundments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Sommerhäuser M., Robert S., Birk, S., Hering D., Moog O., Stubauer I, et al., Developing the tipology of surface waters and defining the relevant reference conditions, UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project, Final Report, 2003Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Stevanović, V., Rasprostranjenje i ekologija makrofitske vegetacije u đerdapskoj akumulaciji. In: Tripković, D. (Ed.) Izveštaj o zajedničkom ispitivanju reke Dunava na teritoriji SR Jugoslavije u okviru međunarodnog programa JDS-ITR. Ministarstvo za zaštitu prirodnih bogadstava i životne sredine, Savezni hidrometeorološki zavod, 2001, 93–104 (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Stevanović V., Šinžar-Sekulić J., Stevanović B., Expansion of the adventive species Paspalum paspaloides (Michx) Schribner, Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch and Cyperus strigosus L. in the Yugoslav part of the Danube reservoir (km 1090–1075), Limnological reports, 35th IAD Conference, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro, 2004, 35, 399–405Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Vukov D., Anačkov G., Igić R., Aquatic macrophytes in Danube river near Pancevo (Serbia and Montenegro), Book of abstracts, Third International Balkan Botanical Congress, Sarajevo, Bosna i Hercegovina, 2003, 311Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Vukov D., Anačkov G., Boža P., Janauer G.A., Genus Potamogeton L. 1753 in the Danube River Corridor (rkm 1296-1076), Limnological reports, 35th IAD Conference, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro, 2004, 35, 413–419Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Vukov D., Anačkov G., Igić R., Janauer, G.A., The Aquatic macrophytes of “Mali Đerdap” (Danube, rkm 1039-999), Limnological reports, 35th IAD Conference, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro, 2004, 35, 421–426Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Vukov D., Igić R., Boža P., Anačkov G., Janauer G.A., Habitat and Plant Species Diversity along the Danube River in Serbia, Book of Abstracts, 36th IAD Conference, Vienna, Austria, 2006, 23Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Radulović S., Vodena vegetacija Koviljskog rita. Magistarska teza, Prirodno-matematički fakultet, Institut za biologiju, Novi Sad, 2000 (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Panjković B., Radulović S., Vučković M., Amidžić L., Aquatic moss communities at Monoštorski Rit wetland area (Danube, S&M), Limnological reports, 35th IAD Conference, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro, 2004, 35, 427–432Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Šinžar-Sekulić J., Vremenska dinamika i produkcija makrofitske vegetacije ma delu Dunava od Ade Žilovo do ušća Nere, Doktorska disertacija, Biološki fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, 2006 (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Janauer G.A., Aquatic Macrophytes: indicators for ecotones in backwater of the River Danube (Austria), Arch. Hydrobiol., 1996, Suppl. 113, Large Rivers 10, 477–483Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Janauer G.A., Exler N., Distribution and habitat conditions of the six most frequent hydrophytes in the Danube River corridor: status 2002, 35th IAD Conference, Limnological reports, 2004, 35, 407–411Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Janauer G.A., Heindl E., Die Schätzskala nach Kohler: Zur Gültigkeit der Funktion f(x)=ax3 als Mab für die Pflanzenmenge von Makrophyten, Ber. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Österreich, 1997, 135, 25–38 (in German)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Janauer G.A., Pall K. (1999): Predicting quantitative changes in macrophyte stands following manintroduced flood impact in backwaters of the Lobau area (Vienna): a methodological test using single stand surveys and GIS application, Hohenheimer Umwelttagung, Verlag Günther Heimbach, Stuttgart, 1999, 31, 215–226Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Janauer G.A., Pall K., Makrophytenvegetation des Giebganges Greifenstein. In: Giebgang Greifenstein — Vegetation. Schriftenreihe der Forschung im Verbund, Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschaft AG (Verbund), Wien, 1999, 53, 5–96 (in German)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Janauer G.A., Vukov D., Igić R., Aquatic Macrophytes in Danube River near Novi Sad, Arch. Hydrobiol., 2003, Suppl. Large Rivers 14, 195–203Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Janauer G.A., Wychera U., Biodiversity, succesion and the functional role of macrophytes in the New Danube (Vienna, Austria), Arch. Hydrobiol., 2000, Suppl. Large Rivers 12/1, 61–74Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Janauer G.A., Zoufal R., Christof-Dirry P., Englmaier P., Neue Aspekte der Charakterisierung und vergleichenden Beurteilung der Gewasservegetation, Ber. Inst. Landschafts-Pflanzenökologie Univ. Hohenheim, 1993, 2, 59–70 (in German)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Kohler A., Janauer G.A., Zur Methodik der Untersuchung von Wasserpflanzen. In: Steinberg Ch., Bernhardt H., Klapper H. Handbuch Angewandte Limnologie. Ecomed, Landsberg/Lech, 1995, 22 (in German)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Kohler A., Methoden der Kartierung von Flora und Vegetation von Sübwasserbiotopen, Landschaft + Stadt, 1978, 10, 23–85 (in German)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kohler A., Vollarath H., Beisl E., Zur Verbeitung, Vergesellschaftung und Ökologie der Gefäß-Makrophyten im Fließwassersystem Moosach (Münicher Ebene), Arch. Hydrobiol., 1971, 69, 333–365 (in German)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Pall K., Janauer G.A., Die Makrophytenvegetation von Flubstauen am Beispiel der Donau zwischen Flub-km, 2552.0 und 2511.8 in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Arch. Hydrobiol, 1995, Suppl. 101, Large Rivers 9, 91–109 (in German)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Pall K., Janauer G.A., Makrophyteninventar der Donau. Ergebnisse der Kartierung im Jahr 1995. Schriftenreihe der Forschung im Verbund, 1998, 38, 1–116 (in German)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Pall K., Janauer G.A., Makrophyteninventar der Donau. Ergebnisse der Kartierung im Jahr 1995, Schriftenreihe der Forschung im Verbund, 1998, 38, 1–116 (in German)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Pall K., Rath B., Janauer G.A., Die Makrophyten in dynamischen und abgedämmten Gewässersystemen der Kleinen Schüttinsel (Donau Flub-km 1848 bis1806), Limnologica, 1996, 26, 105–115 (in German)Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Ráth B., The macrophyte vegetation of small branchsystem of the Danube at Dunaremete (Szigetköz, rkm 1826), Acta Botanica Hungarica, 1987, 33(3–4), 187–197Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Ráth B., Verbeitung von aquatischen Makrophytenbeständen im Flubbett des früheren Hauptarmes der Donau (Szigetköz, Str.-km 1826–1843), 32. Konferenz IAD, Wien/Österreich. Limnol. Ber Donau, Wiss. Referate, 1997, 227–232 (in German)Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Vukov D., Akvatične makrofite reke Zasavice. Magistarska teza, Prirodno-matematički fakultet, Departman za biologiju i ekologiju, Novi Sad, 2003 (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Vukov D., Igić R., Anačkov G., Boža P., Akvatične makrofite Prekopca i Jovače (Zasavica, Jugoslavija). In: Igić, R., Gajin, S. (Ed.) “Zasavica 2001” — monografija posvećena istraživanjima u Specijalnom rezervatu prirode “Zasavica”, PMF, Institut za biologiju, Novi Sad, Goransko-ekološki pokret Sremska Mitrovica, 2001, 49–56 (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Vukov D., Igić R., Boža P., Anačkov G., Butorac B., Survey into the aquatic macrophytes of the Zasavica Natural Reservation (Yugoslavia). In: Gallé, L., Körmöczi (Ed.) Ecology of River Valleys, TISCIA Monograph Series, 2000, 183–187Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Directive 2000/60/EC of European Parliament and Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policyGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A. (Eds.), Flora Europaea II-V, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1968–1980Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M., Webb D.A. (Eds.), Flora Europaea I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1964Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Otahelová H., Valachovič M., Distribution of macrophytes in different water-bodies (habitats) influenced by the GabčÍkovo hydropower station (Slovakia)-present status, Arch. Hydrobiol, 2003, Suppl. 147/1–2, Large Rivers 14, 97–115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dragana Vukov
    • 1
  • Pal Boža
    • 1
  • Ružica Igić
    • 1
  • Goran Anačkov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences and MathematicsUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations